The perks and pitfalls of conformity: unravelling the role of gender conformity in friendship satisfaction among adolescents

References

• Alm, S., and S. B. Låftman. 2018. “The Gendered Mirror on the Wall.” YOUNG 26 (5): 525–541.
   Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. L. 2017. IBM® SPSS® Amos™ 25 User’s Guide. AMOS Development Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Mastari, L., B. Spruyt, and J. Siongers. 2019. “Benevolent and Hostile Sexism in Social Spheres: The Impact of Parents, School and Romance on Belgian Adolescents’ Sexist Attitudes.” Frontiers in Sociology 74 (4): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Badaan, V., J. T. Jost, D. Osborne, C. G. Sibley, J. Ungaretti, E. Etchezahar, and E. P. Hennes. 2018. “Social Protest and Its Discontents.” Contention 6 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Balteiro, I. 2015. “Social Changes Reflected in Specialized Languages: Lexical Re-/Deconstruction in Lesbian Studies.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 173 (2015): 307–311.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R., and M. R. Leary. 1995. “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 117 (3): 497–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, S., N. Korobov, and A. Thorne. 2009. “The Fabric of Internalized Sexism.” Journal of Integrated Social Sciences 1 (1): 10–47.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. C. 2010. “Why do Women Endorse Hostile and Benevolent Sexism?” The Role of Salient Female Subtypes and Internalization of Sexist Contents. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 62 (7-8): 453–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, K., A. Croft, and T. Schmader. 2018. “Worth Less?: Why Men (and Women) Devalue Care-Oriented Careers.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohner, G., K. Ahlborn, and R. Steiner. 2010. “How Sexy are Sexist Men? Women’s Perception of Male Response Profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory.” Sex Roles 62 (7–8): 568–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradt, L., S. Pleysier, J. Put, J. Siongers, and B. Spruyt. (Eds.), 2019. Jongeren in cijfers en letters 4: bevindingen uit de JOP-monitor 4, de JOP-kindmonitor en de JOP-schoolmonitor 2. Leuven: ACCO.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, S. S., and A. J. Davidson. 2017. “Gender (Non)Conformity in Middle Childhood: A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Gender-Typed Behavior, Friendship, and Peer Preference.” Sex Roles 77 (1–2): 16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., S. Fiske, and T. Lee. 2009. “Ambivalent Sexism and Power-Related Gender-Role Ideology in Marriage.” Sex Roles 60 (11-12): 765–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R. E., M. G. Nielson, C. L. Martin, and D. DeLay. 2019. “Early Adolescent Gender Development: The Differential Effects of felt Pressure from Parents, Peers, and the Self.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 48 (10): 1912–1923.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coyle, E. F., M. Fulcher, and D. Trübutschek. 2016. “Sissies, Mama’s Boys, and Tomboys: Is Children’s Gender Nonconformity More Acceptable When Nonconforming Traits Are Positive?” Archives of Sexual Behavior 45 (7): 1827–1838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, E., and N. C. Overall. 2018. “Women’s Attraction to Benevolent Sexism: Needing Relationship Security Predicts Greater Attraction to Men Who Endorse Benevolent Sexism.” European Journal of Social Psychology 48 (3): 336–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dardenne, B., M. Dumont, and T. Bollier. 2007. “Insidious Dangers of Benevolent Sexism: Consequences for Women’s Performance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (5): 764–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, M., and M. Özdemir. 2010. “Friendship, Need Satisfaction and Happiness.” Journal of Happiness Studies 11 (2): 243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiDonato, M. D., and S. A. Berenbaum. 2011. “The Benefits and Drawbacks of Gender Typing: How Different Dimensions are Related to Psychological Adjustment.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 40 (2): 457–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drury, K., W. M. Bukowski, A. M. Velásquez, and L. Stella-Lopez. 2013. “Victimization and Gender Identity in Single-Sex and Mixed-Sex Schools: Examining Contextual Variations in Pressure to Conform to Gender Norms.” Sex Roles 69 (7–8): 442–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., W. Wood, and A. B. Diekman. 2000. “Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities: A Current Appraisal.” In The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, edited by T. Eckes and H. M. Trautner, 123–174. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, S. K., and D. G. Perry. 2001. “Gender Identity: A Multidimensional Analysis with Implications for Psychosocial Adjustment.” Developmental Psychology 37 (4): 451–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. 1968. “Identity: Youth and Crisis.” W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing Lee, E. A., and W. Troop-Gordon. 2011. “Peer Socialization of Masculinity and Femininity: Differential Effects of Overt and Relational Forms of Peer Victimization.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 29 (2): 197–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferragut, M., M. J. Blanca, M. Ortiz-Tallo, and R. Bendayan. 2017. “Sexist Attitudes and Beliefs During Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study of Gender Differences.” European Journal of Developmental Psychology 14 (1): 32–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., A. J. C. Cuddy, P. Glick, and J. Xu. 2002. “A Model of (often mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (6): 878–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., and S. T. Fiske. 1996. “The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (3): 491–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., and S. T. Fiske. 1999. “The Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 23 (3): 519–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., and S. T. Fiske. 2001. “An Ambivalent Alliance: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism as Complementary Justifications for Gender Inequality.” American Psychologist 56 (2): 109–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., M. Wilkerson, and M. Cuffe. 2015. “Masculine Identity, Ambivalent Sexism, and Attitudes Toward Gender Subtypes.” Social Psychology 46 (4): 210–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, J. J., and D. T. Sanchez. 2010. “Doing Gender for Different Reasons: Why Gender Conformity Positively and Negatively Predicts Self-Esteem.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 34 (2): 203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyer, A. E., J. D. Caouette, C. C. Lee, and S. K. Ruiz. 2014. “Will They Like me? Adolescents’ Emotional Responses to Peer Evaluation.” International Journal of Behavioral Development 38 (2): 155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halim, M. L. D., D. N. Ruble, C. S. Tamis-LeMonda, P. E. Shrout, and D. M. Amodio. 2017. “Gender Attitudes in Early Childhood: Behavioral Consequences and Cognitive Antecedents.” Child Development 88 (3): 882–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S., and T. Jefferson. (Eds.), 1976. Resistance Through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-war Britain. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. D., N. C. Overall, and E. J. Cross. 2016. “Internalizing Sexism Within Close Relationships: Perceptions of Intimate Partners’ Benevolent Sexism Promote Women’s Endorsement of Benevolent Sexism.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 110 (2): 214–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. D., C. G. Sibley, and N. C. Overall. 2014. “The Allure of Sexism.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 5 (4): 422–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioverno, S., D. DeLay, C. L. Martin, and L. D. Hanish. 2020. “Who Engages in Gender Bullying? The Role of Homophobic Name-Calling.” Gender Pressure, and Gender Conformity. Educational Researcher 50 (4): 214–224.
   Google Scholar
• Jewell, J. A., and C. S. Brown. 2014. “Relations Among Gender Typicality.” Peer Relations, and Mental Health During Early Adolescence: Gender Typicality in Adolescence. Social Development 23 (1): 137–156.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. M., J. M. Vaterlaus, M. A. Jackson, and T. B. Morrill. 2014. “Friendship Characteristics, Psychosocial Development, and Adolescent Identity Formation.” Personal Relationships 21 (1): 51–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. 2020. A Theory of System Justification. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lagaert, S., M. Van Houtte, and H. Roose. 2017. “Engendering Culture: The Relationship of Gender Identity and Pressure for Gender Conformity with Adolescents’ Interests in the Arts and Literature.” Sex Roles 77 (7–8): 482–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, L. M., R. S. Bigler, L. S. Liben, and V. A. Green. 2009. “Teaching Children to Confront Peers’ Sexist Remarks: Implications for Theories of Gender Development and Educational Practice.” Sex Roles 61 (5): 361–382.
   Google Scholar
• Mayeux, L., and M. Kleiser. 2020. “A Gender Prototypicality Theory of Adolescent Peer Popularity.” Adolescent Research Review 5 (3): 295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, K. K. 2021. “Not Like Other Girls”: Implicit and Explicit Dimensions of Internalized Sexism and Behavioral Outcomes. Washington: Western Washington University Graduate School Collection.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, C. M., and J. Strough. 2010. “Gender Segregation and Gender-Typing in Adolescence.” Sex Roles 63 (3–4): 251–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montañés, P., S. de Lemus, M. Moya, G. Bohner, and J. L. Megías. 2013. “How Attractive Are Sexist Intimates to Adolescents? The Influence of Sexist Beliefs and Relationship Experience.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 37 (4): 494–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, R., E. Larrañaga, and S. Yubero. 2016. “Gender Identity, Gender-Typed Personality Traits and School Bullying: Victims, Bullies and Bully-victims.” Child Indicators Research 9 (1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napier, J. L., H. Thorisdottir, and J. T. Jost. 2010. “The Joy of Sexism? A Multinational Investigation of Hostile and Benevolent Justifications for Gender Inequality and Their Relations to Subjective Well-Being.” Sex Roles 62 (7–8): 405–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberle, E., K. A. Schonert-Reichl, and K. C. Thomson. 2010. “Understanding the Link Between Social and Emotional Well-Being and Peer Relations in Early Adolescence: Gender-Specific Predictors of Peer Acceptance.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 39 (11): 1330–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahlke, E., R. S. Bigler, and C. L. Martin. 2014. “Can Fostering Children’s Ability to Challenge Sexism Improve Critical Analysis, Internalization, and Enactment of Inclusive, Egalitarian Peer Relationships?” Journal of Social Issues 70 (1): 115–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, L., and K. Forbes. 2012. “‘Doing Gender’ in the Imagined Futures of Young New Zealanders.” YOUNG 20 (2): 119–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, E., and M. J. Smith. 2016. “Gender Policing.” In Critical Concepts in Queer Studies and Education, edited by N. M. Rodriguez, W. J. Martino, J. C. Ingrey, and E. Brockenbrough, 127–136. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, D. A., and E. Carranza. 2002. “What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn’t be, are Allowed to be, and Don’t Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 26 (4): 269–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C. S., and M. E. Addis. 2016. “Adolescent Boys’ Experiences with Policing of Masculinity: Forms, Functions, and Consequences.” Psychology of Men & Masculinity 17 (1): 74–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., and P. Glick. 2008. The Social Psychology of Gender: How Power and Intimacy Shape Gender Relations. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., A. Nora, F. K. Stage, E. A. Barlow, and J. King. 2006. “Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review.” The Journal of Educational Research 99 (6): 323–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, K. M., and L. S. Liben. 2021. “Felt Pressure to Conform to Cultural Gender Roles: Correlates and Consequences.” Sex Roles 84 (3): 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. E., and C. Leaper. 2006. “Self-Perceived Gender Typicality and the Peer Context During Adolescence.” Journal of Research on Adolescence 16 (1): 91–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbossche, L., B. Spruyt, and G. Keppens. 2017. “Young, Innocent and Sexist?” Social Differences in Benevolent and Hostile Sexist Attitudes Towards Women Amongst Flemish Adolescents. YOUNG 26 (1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Van Houtte, M. 2020. “Boys Keep Swinging? Sex-Composition of the School and Pressure for Gender-Conformity.” Gender and Education.” Advance Online Publication 33 (3): 355–371.
   Google Scholar
• Vantieghem, W., and M. Van Houtte. 2015. “Are Girls More Resilient to Gender-Conformity Pressure? The Association Between Gender-Conformity Pressure and Academic Self-Efficacy.” Sex Roles 73 (1–2): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• West, C., and D. H. Zimmerman. 1987. “Doing Gender.” Gender & Society 1 (2): 125–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer, R., C. L. Rogalin, B. Conlon, and M. T. Wojnowicz. 2013. “Overdoing Gender: A Test of the Masculine Overcompensation Thesis.” American Journal of Sociology 118 (4): 980–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunger, J. L., P. R. Carver, and D. G. Perry. 2004. “Does Gender Identity Influence Children's Psychological Well-Being?” Developmental Psychology 40 (4): 572–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zosuls, K. M., N. C. Z. Andrews, C. L. Martin, D. E. England, and R. D. Field. 2016. “Developmental Changes in the Link Between Gender Typicality and Peer Victimization and Exclusion.” Sex Roles 75 (5-6): 243–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar