Utilizing institutional perspectives to investigate the emergence, rise, and (relative) decline of corporate universities

References

• Abel, A., and J. Li. 2012. “Exploring the Corporate University Phenomenon: Development and Implementation of a Comprehensive Survey.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 23 (1): 103–128. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, E. 1996. “Management Fashion.” Academy of Management Review 21 (1): 254–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alagaraja, M. 2013a. “HRD and HRM Perspectives on Organizational Performance: A Review of Literature.” Human Resource Development Review 12 (2): 117–143. doi:10.1177/1534484312450868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alagaraja, M. 2013b. “Mobilizing Organizational Alignment through Strategic Human Resource Development.” Human Resource Development International 16 (1): 74–93. doi:10.1080/13678868.2012.740794.
   Google Scholar
• Alagaraja, M. 2014. “A Conceptual Model of Organizations as Learning-Performance Systems: Integrative Review of Lean Implementation Literature.” Human Resource Development Review. doi:10.1177/1534484313495852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alagaraja, M., and T. Egan. 2013. “The Strategic Value of HRD in Lean Strategy Implementation.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 24 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M. 2002. The Corporate University Handbook: Designing, Managing, and Growing a Successful Program. New York: AMACOM.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M. 2010. “Corporate Universities 2010: Globalization and Greater Sophistication.” Journal of International Management Studies 5 (1): 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Almog-Bareket, G. 2012. “Visionary Leadership in Business Schools: An Institutional Framework.” Journal of Management Development 31 (4): 431–440. doi:10.1108/02621711211219086.
   Google Scholar
• Andresen, M. 2007. “Diversity Learning, Knowledge Diversity and Inclusion: Theory and Practice as Exemplified by Corporate Universities.” Journal of Workplace Learning 26 (8): 743–760.
   Google Scholar
• Arnone, M. 1998. “Corporate Universities: A Viewpoint on the Challenges and Best Practices.” Career Development International 3 (5): 199–205. doi:10.1108/13620439810229415.
   Google Scholar
• Blass, E. 2001. “What’s in a Name? A Comparative Study of the Traditional Public University and the Corporate University.” Human Resource Development International 4 (2): 153–172. doi:10.1080/13678860121806.
   Google Scholar
• Blass, E. 2005. “The Rise and Rise of the Corporate University.” Journal of European Industrial Training 29 (1): 58–74. doi:10.1108/03090590510576217.
   Google Scholar
• Bober, C. F., and K. R. Bartlett. 2004. “The Utilization of Training Program Evaluation in Corporate Universities.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 15 (4): 363–383. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1111.
   Google Scholar
• Braunscheidel, M. J., J. W. Hamister, N. C. Suresh, and H. Star. 2011. “An Institutional Theory Perspective on Six Sigma Adoption.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 31 (4): 423–451. doi:10.1108/01443571111119542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, I., and R. Dealtry. 2003. “The New Generation of Corporate Universities – Co-Creating Sustainable Enterprise and Business Development Solutions.” Journal of Workplace Learning 15 (7/8): 368–381. doi:10.1108/13665620310504864.
   Google Scholar
• CUE—Corporate University Enterprise. 2007. “Corporate University Definition.” Accessed March 27, 2013. http://www.cuenterprise.com/777about/whatiscu.php
   Google Scholar
• Dacin, M. T., J. Goodstein, and W. R. Scott. 2002. “Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the Special Research Forum.” Academy of Management Journal 45: 45–56. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2002.6283388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dealtry, R. 2000. “Strategic Directions in the Management of the Corporate University Paradigm.” Journal of Workplace Learning 12 (4): 171–175. doi:10.1108/13665620010332903.
   Google Scholar
• Dealtry, R. 2001. “How to Configure the Corporate University for Success.” Journal of Workplace Learning 13 (2): 73–79. doi:10.1108/13665620110383681.
   Google Scholar
• Dealtry, R. 2008. “Interim Reflections on the Corporate University and SME Academy Business Development Innovation and Its Diffusion.” Journal of Workplace Learning 20 (1): 71–78. doi:10.1108/13665620810843656.
   Google Scholar
• Dealtry, R., and K. Howard. 2008. “Moving Towards Optimising Demand-Led Learning: The 2005-2007 ECUANET Leonardo Da Vinci Project.” Journal of Workplace Learning 20 (3): 214–224. doi:10.1108/13665620810860503.
   Google Scholar
• Delmas, M., and M. W. Toffel. 2004. “Stakeholders and Environmental Management Practices: An Institutional Framework.” Business Strategy and the Environment 13 (4): 209–222. doi:10.1002/bse.409.
   Google Scholar
• Densford, L. E. 1999. “Motorola University: The Next 20 Years.” Corporate University Review 7 (1): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 82: 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECUANET—The European Corporate Universities and Academies Network. 2006. “ECUANET – An Overview of Corporate Universities.” Accessed September 10, 2013. www.ecuanet.info/downloads/06Mar20_ECUANET_research.doc
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1988. “Agency- and Institutional-Theory Explanations: The Case of Retail Sales Compensation.” Academy of Management Journal 31 (3): 488–511. doi:10.2307/256457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fresina, A. J. 1997. “Corporate Universities Can – and Should – Be Typed According to Their Missions. Is Yours a Reinforcer, Change Manager or Shaper?” Corporate University Review 5 (1): 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., C. R. Hinings, and R. H. Suddaby. 2002. “Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 58–80. doi:10.2307/3069285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne, E. M., P. A. Libby, and N. S. Nash. 1983. “The Emergence of Corporate Colleges.” The Journal of Continuing Higher Education 31 (4): 2–9. doi:10.1080/07377366.1983.10401359.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, P., and A. Pyman. 2006. “Corporate Universities: A Catalyst for Strategic Human Resource Development?” Journal of European Industrial Training 30 (1): 19–31. doi:10.1108/03090590610643851.
   Google Scholar
• Homan, G., and A. Macpherson. 2005. “E-Learning in the Corporate University.” Journal of European Industrial Training 29 (1): 75–90. doi:10.1108/03090590510576226.
   Google Scholar
• Hype Cycle. 2013. “In Gartner Research Methodologies.” Accessed August 12, 2013. from the World Wide Web: http://www.gartner.com/technology/research/methodologies/hype-cycle.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Iarossi, J., J. Miller, J. O’Connor, and M. Keil. 2013. “Addressing the Sustainability Challenge: Insights from Institutional Theory and Organizational Learning.” Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics 10 (1): 76–91.
   Google Scholar
• Jansink, F., K. Kwakman, and J. Streumer. 2005. “The Knowledge-Productive Corporate University.” Journal of European Industrial Training 29 (1): 40–57. doi:10.1108/03090590510576208.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, P. 2001. Universities and Corporate Universities. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, C. 1995. The Uses of the University. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuchinke, K. P. 2000. “Debates over the Nature of HRD: An Institutional Theory Perspective.” Human Resource Development International 3 (3): 279–283. doi:10.1080/13678860050128474.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J. 2013. “Web-Based Technology and the Changing Landscape of HRD.” Human Resource Development International 16 (3): 247–250. doi:10.1080/13678868.2013.799401.
   Google Scholar
• Margherita, A., and G. Secundo. 2009. “The Emergence of the Stakeholder University.” In Open Business Innovation Leadership: The Emergence of the Stakeholder University, edited by A. Romano, 243. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, P. 2001. “Where Do Training Leaders Come From?” The New Corporate University Review 11 (9): 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, W., M. S. Carol, and G. S. Allen. 1995. “Organizational Downsizing: Constraining, Cloning, Learning.” The Academy of Management Executive 9 (3): 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Meister, J. C. 1994. Corporate Quality Universities: Lessons in Building a World-Class Work Force. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Meister, J. C. 1998. Corporate Universities – Lessons in Building a World-Class Work Force. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, L., and S. Renaud. 2004. “Participation in Corporate University Training: Its Effect on Individual Job Performance.” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de L’administration 21 (4): 295–306. doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.2004.tb00346.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2002. The Knowledge Economy and Postsecondary Education: Report of a Workshop, edited by P. A. Graham and N. G. Stacy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. 1991. “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes.” Academy of Management Review 16: 145–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. 1992. “The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization.” Organization Studies 13 (4): 563–588. doi:10.1177/017084069201300403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paauwe, J., and P. Boselie. 2003. “Challenging ‘Strategic HRM’ and the Relevance of the Institutional Setting.” Human Resource Management Journal 13 (3): 56–70. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2003.tb00098.x.
   Google Scholar
• Paton, R., G. Peters, J. Storey, and S. Taylor. 2000. Handbook of Corporate University Development: Managing Strategic Learning Initiatives in Public and Private Domains. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, C., and G. Beaver. 2001. “The Rise and Rise of Corporate University: The Emerging Corporate Learning Agenda.” The International Journal of Education Management 1 (3): 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, C., and J. Stewart. 2002. “Corporate Universities – An Analytical Framework.” Journal of Management Development 21 (10): 794–811. doi:10.1108/02621710210448057.
   Google Scholar
• Qiao, J. 2009. “Corporate Universities in China: Processes, Issues and Challenges.” Journal of Workplace Learning 21 (2): 166–174. doi:10.1108/13665620910934852.
   Google Scholar
• Rademakers, M. 2005. “Corporate Universities: Driving Force of Knowledge Innovation.” Journal of Workplace Learning 17 (1/2): 130–136. doi:10.1108/13665620510574513.
   Google Scholar
• Renaud-Coulon, A. 2008. Corporate Universities: A Lever of Corporate Responsibility. Paris: Global CCU Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ronchi, D. 2004. “Passion and Poetry in Raytheon Learning.” T +D. Accessed June 21, 2006. http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/14396272/passion-poetry-raytheon-learning
   Google Scholar
• Schrage, M. 1999. “Sorry, No Keg Parties Here. This University Is on the Desktop Campus Clone or Automated Products?” Accessed June 7, 1999. http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1999/06/07/261041/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 2004. “Institutional Theory.” In Encyclopedia of Social Theory, edited by G. Ritzer, 408–414. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., and E. V. Backman. 1990. “Institutional Theory and the Medical Care Sector.” In Innovations in Health Care Delivery: Insights for Organization Theory, edited by S. S. Mick, 20–52. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sham, C. 2007. “An Exploratory Study of Corporate Universities in China.” Journal of Workplace Learning 19 (4): 257–264. doi:10.1108/13665620710747933.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. 2005. “The Corporate University: Global or Local Phenomenon?” Journal of European Industrial Training 29 (1): 21–39. doi:10.1108/03090590510576190.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., and J. McGoldrick. 1996. Human Resource Development: Perspectives, Strategies, and Practice. London: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, R. A., and E. F. Holton. 2001. Foundations of Human Resource Development. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., and T. Phillips. 2002. The Corporate University Challenge: Corporate Competitiveness, Learning and Knowledge. Report of the EFMD Corporate University Learning Group, EFMD, Milton Keynes: Eindhoven Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, H., K. W. Kwok, and B. Izak. 2003. “Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective.” MIS Quarterly 27 (1): 19–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. 1999. “The Corporate University as a Model for Organizational and Industrial Learning.” Presented at IQPC: Launching and Managing a Corporate University Conference, London, June 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Torraco, R. J. 2005. “Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples.” Human Resource Development Review 4 (3): 356–367. doi:10.1177/1534484305278283.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, J. 1999. Strategic Human Resource Development. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., J. Li, X. Qiao, and J. Sun. 2010. “Understanding the Corporate University Phenomenon: A Human Capital Theory Perspective.” International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management 10 (2): 182–204. doi:10.1504/IJHRDM.2010.031443.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., W. Rothwell, and J. Sun. 2009. “Management Development in China: A Policy Analysis.” International Journal of Training and Development 13 (4): 205–220. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2009.00328.x.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., R. Gulati, and S. M. Shortell. 1997. “Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (2): 366–394. doi:10.2307/2393924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiu, D., and S. Makino. 2002. “The Choice between Joint Venture and Wholly Owned Subsidiary: An Institutional Perspective.” Organization Science 13 (6): 667–683. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.6.667.494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar