4,116
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Peer-reviewed Articles

Understanding the evolution of the forms of carrying out human resource development

Pages 262-278 | Received 09 Jun 2019, Accepted 31 Aug 2020, Published online: 13 Sep 2020

References

  • Adler, P. S. 2009. “Marx and Organization Studies Today.” In The Oxford Handbook of Sociology and Organization Studies: Classical Foundations, edited by P. S. Adler, 61–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Beckhard, R. 2006. “What Is Organization Development?” In Organisation Development. A Jossey-Bass Reader, edited by J. V. Gallos, 3–12. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bodrožić, Z., and P. S. Adler. 2017. “The Evolution of Management Models: A Neo-Schumpeterian Theory.” Administrative Science Quarterly 63 (1): 85–129. doi:10.1177/0001839217704811.
  • Bushe, G. R., and R. J. Marshak. 2009. “Revisioning Organization Development: Diagnostic and Dialogic Premises and Patterns of Practice.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 45 (3): 348–368. doi:10.1177/0021886309335070.
  • Callahan, J. L., J. Stewart, C. Rigg, S. Sambrook, and K. Trehan, eds. 2015. Realising Critical HRD: Stories of Reflecting, Voicing, and Enacting Critical Practice. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Chermack, T. J., S. A. Lynham, and W. E. A. Ruona. 2003. “Critical Uncertainties Confronting Human Resource Development.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 5 (3): 257–271. doi:10.1177/1523422303254628.
  • Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler. 2006. “New Public Management Is Dead – Long Live Digital-era Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (3): 467–494. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057.
  • Edmondson, A. C. 1996. “Three Faces of Eden: The Persistence of Competing Theories and Multiple Diagnoses in Organizational Intervention Research.” Human Relations 49 (5): 571–595. doi:10.1177/001872679604900503.
  • Engeström, Y. 1994. Training for Change: New Approach to Instruction and Learning in Working Life. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
  • Engeström, Y. 1995. Kehittävä Työntutkimus. Perusteita, Tuloksia Ja Haasteita. Helsinki: Hallinnon kehittämiskeskus.
  • Engeström, Y. 2015. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Garavan, T. N., N. Heraty, and B. Barnicle. 1999. “Human Resource Development Literature: Current Issues, Priorities and Dilemmas.” Journal of European Industrial Training 23 (4/5): 169–179. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000004567.
  • Hamlin, B., and J. Stewart. 2011. “What Is HRD? A Definitional Review and Synthesis of the HRD Domain.” Journal of European Industrial Training 35 (3): 199–220. doi:10.1108/03090591111120377.
  • Hamlin, R. G. 2007. “An Evidence-Based Perspective on HRD.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 9 (1): 42–57. doi:10.1177/1523422306294494.
  • Hurt, A. C., S. A. Lynham, and G. N. McLean. 2014. “Investigating the HRD Cube and Explicating Extant Paradigms of HRD.” European Journal of Training and Development 38 (4): 323–346. doi:10.1108/EJTD-07-2013-0081.
  • Ilyenkov, E. V. 2008. The Dialectics of the Abstract and the Concrete in Marx’s Capital. Delhi: Aakar books.
  • KEHTO. 1971. “The Development Project Report.” Tie- ja vesirakennuslaitos.
  • Kraiger, K. 2014. “Looking Back and Looking Forward: Trends in Training and Development Research.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 25 (4): 401–408. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21203.
  • Lee, M. 2014. “The History, Status and Future of HRD.” In The Routledge Companion to Human Resource Development, edited by R. F. Poell, T. S. Rocco, and G. L. Roth, 41–50. London: Routledge.
  • Leont’ev, A. N. 1978. Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Levä, K. 1993. Virastosta Liikelaitokseksi, Virkamiehestä Johtajaksi. Tielaitoksen Johtaminen 1960-luvulta 1990-luvulle. Helsinki: Tielaitos.
  • Perez, C. 2002. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Northampton, MA: Edward Edgar Publishing.
  • Ruona, W. E. A. 2016. “Evolving Human Resource Development.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 18 (4): 551–565. doi:10.1177/1523422316660968.
  • Sambrook, S., and J. Stewart. 2000. “Factors Influencing Learning in European Learning Oriented Organisations: Issues for Management.” Journal of European Industrial Training 24 (2/3/4): 209–219. doi:10.1108/03090590010321179.
  • Sannino, A. 2015. “The Principle of Double Stimulation: A Path to Volitional Action.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 6: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.01.001.
  • Swanson, R. A., and E. F. Holton. 2009. Foundations of Human Resource Development. 2nd ed. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Tierumpu. The personnel magazine of RBC, 9-10/1973, 2/1975, 2/1991, 3/1994, 5/1995.
  • Tolman, C. 1981. “The Metaphysic of Relations in Klaus Riegel’s “Dialectics” of Human Development.” Human Development 24 (1): 33–51. doi:10.1159/000272623.
  • Torraco, R. J. 2016. “Early History of the Fields of Practice of Training and Development and Organization Development.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 18 (4): 439–453. doi:10.1177/1523422316659898.
  • Tsoukas, H. 1989. “The Validity of Idiographic Research Explanations.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 551–561. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308386.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. 1981. “The Instrumental Method in Psychology.” In The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, edited by J. V. Wertsch, 134–143. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
  • Yliaska, V. 2014. Tehokkuuden Toiveuni. Uuden Julkisjohtamisen Historia Suomessa 1970-luvulta 1990-luvulle. Helsinki: Into Kustannus.
  • Zahn, D. 2001. “Training: A Function, Profession, Calling, What?” Training and Development Journal 55 (4): 36–41.