How South Korean women leaders respond to their token status: assimilation and resistance

References

• Abadi, M., K. Dirani, and F. D. Rezaei. 2020. “Women in Leadership: A Systematic Literature Review of Middle Eastern Women Managers‘ Careers from NHRD and Institutional Theory Perspectives.” Human Resource Development International 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1840847.
   Google Scholar
• Anisman-Razin, M., and T. Saguy. 2016. “Reactions to Tokenism: The Role of Individual Characteristics in Shaping Responses to Token Decisions.” European Journal of Social Psychology 46 (6): 716–731. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archbold, C. A., and D. M. Schulz. 2008. “Making Rank: The Lingering Effects of Tokenism on Female Police Officers’ Promotion Aspirations.” Police Quarterly 11 (1): 50–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bierema, L. L. 2016. “Women’s Leadership: Troubling Notions of the “Ideal” (Male) Leader.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 18 (2): 119–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierema, L. L. 2020. “Ladies and Gentlemen, Your Implicit Bias Is Showing: Gender Hegemony and Its Impact on HRD Research and Practice.” Human Resource Development International 23 (5): 473–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brescoll, V. L., E. Dawson, and E. L. Uhlmann. 2010. “Hard Won and Easily Lost: The Fragile Status of Leaders in Gender-Stereotype-Incongruent Occupations.” Psychological Science 21 (11): 1640–1642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, D. S., S. Jeong, J. Kim, S. Kim, and R. G. Hamlin. 2016. “Perceived Managerial and Leadership Effectiveness in a Korean Context: An Indigenous Qualitative Study.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 33 (3): 789–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, F. M., and D. F. Halpern. 2010. “Women at the Top: Powerful Leaders Define Success as Work + Family in a Culture of Gender.” American Psychologist 65 (3): 182–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., J. Park, B. Ju, S. Han, H. Moon, S. Park, A. Joo, and E. Park. 2016. “Women Leaders’ Work‐Life Imbalance in South Korean Companies: A Collaborative Qualitative Study.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 27 (4): 461–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., J. Park, S. Han, B. Ju, J. You, A. Ju, C. Park, and H. Y. Park. 2017. “How Do South Korean Female Executives’ Definitions of Career Success Differ from Those of Male Executives?.” European Journal of Training and Development 41 (6): 490–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., N. Kim, M. Lee, J. S. Lim, H. Han, and H. Y. Park. 2015. “South Korean Women Leaders’ Struggles for a Work and Family Balance.” Human Resource Development International 18 (5): 521–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J. 2017. “Reducing Gender Biases in Modern Workplaces: A Small Wins Approach to Organizational Change.” Gender & Society 31 (6): 725–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, L. S., and C. R. Williamson 2019. “Does Individualism Promote Gender Equality?” World Development, 123.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, A. B., and L. M. Dzubinski. 2016. “Making the Invisible Visible: A Cross‐ Sector Analysis of Gender‐ Based Leadership Barriers.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 27 (2): 181–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, A. B., Stephenson, A. L., Dzubinski, L. M., and Wang, D. C. 2020. “Measuring the Invisible: Development and Multi-Industry Validation of the Gender Bias Scale for Women Leaders.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 31: 249–280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstad, B., and G. Ladegard. 2012. “Women on Corporate Boards: Key Influencers or Tokens?.” Journal of Management & Governance 16 (4): 595–615.
   Google Scholar
• Ely, R. J., H. Ibarra, and D. M. Kolb. 2011. “Taking Gender into Account : Theory and Design for Women’s Leadership Development Programs.” Academy of Management Learning and Education 10 (3): 474–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, S. 2017. “The Patriarchs are Falling. The Patriarchy Is Stronger than Ever.” The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/28/opinion/sunday/patriarchy-feminism-metoo.html?_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Farh, C. I. C., J. K. Oh, J. R. Hollenbeck, A. Yu, S. M. Lee, and D. D. King. 2020. “Token Female Voice Enactment in Traditional Male-Dominated Teams: Facilitating Conditions and Consequences for Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 63 (3): 832–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Githens, R. P. 2015. “Critical Action Research in Human Resource Development.” Human Resource Development Review 14 (2): 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, J. L. 2008. “Tokenism in Policing: An Empirical Test of Kanter’s Hypothesis.” Journal of Criminal Justice 36 (1): 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, H., Y. Kim, S. Kim, Y. Cho, and C. Chae. 2018. “Looking into the Labyrinth of Gender Inequality: Women Physicians’ Career Development in South Korean Academic Medicine.” Medical Education 52: 1083–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton, J. 2008. “Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data: An Overview.” Historical Social Research 33 (3): 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekman, D. R., S. K. Johnson, M.-D. Foo, and W. Yang. 2017. “Does Diversity-Valuing Behavior Result in Diminished Performance Ratings for Non-White and Female Leaders?.” Academy of Management Journal 60 (2): 771–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmert, M. 2012. Tiger Management: Korean Companies on World Markets. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herschel, R. T., T. R. Cooper, L. F. Smith, and L. Arrington. 1994. “Exploring Numerical Proportions in a Unique Context: The Group Support Systems Meeting Environment.” Sex Roles 31 (1–2): 99–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewstone, M., R. J. Crisp, A. Contarello, A. Voci, L. Conway, G. Marletta, and H. Willis. 2006. “Tokens in the Tower: Perceptual Processes and Interaction Dynamics in Academic Settings with ‘Skewed’, `tilted’ and `balanced’ Sex Ratios.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 9 (4): 509–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Horak, S. 2014. “Antecedents and Characteristics of Informal Relation-Based Networks in Korea: Yongo, Yonjul and Inmaek.” Asia Pacific Business Review 20 (1): 78–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, S. 2013. “Qualitative Seconday Data Analysis: Ethics, Epistemology and Context.” Progress in Development Studies 13 (4): 295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. R., and K. A. Tunheim. 2016. “Understanding the Experiences of Professional Women Leaders Living and Working in Sweden.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 18 (2): 169–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalev, A., F. Dobbin, and E. Kelly. 2006. “Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies.” American Sociological Review 71: 589–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalysh, K., C. T. Kulik, and S. Perera. 2016. “Help or Hindrance? Work-Life Practice and Women in Management.” The Leadership Quarterly 27: 504–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. 1977a. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 965–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. 1977b. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kanthak, K., and G. A. Krause. 2010. “Valuing Diversity in Political Organizations: Gender and Token Minorities in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 839–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, E. B., M. R. Hebl, J. M. George, and S. F. Matusik. 2010. “Understanding Tokenism: Antecedents and Consequences of a Psychological Climate of Gender Inequity.” Journal of Management 36 (2): 482–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, A. M., V. Kramer, and S. Erkut. 2008. “Critical Mass: The Impact of Three or More Women on Corporate Boards.” Organizational Dynamics 37: 145–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. 1995. “A Study of the Korean Military Culture.” Korean Journal of Sociology 29 (3): 171–198. (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. M., and James, E. H. 2007. “She’-e-os: Gender Effects and Investor Reactions to the Announcements of Top Executive Appointments.” Strategic Management Journal 28 (3): 227–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, P., and R. Simpson. 2012. “Kanter Revisited: Gender, Power and (In)visibility.” International Journal of Management Reviews 14: 141–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, S. R., and R. T. Scribner. 2017. “A Perspective on Gender in Management: The Need for Strategic Cross-Cultural Scholarship on Women in Management and Leadership.” Cross Cultural & Strategic Management 24 (2): 231–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvin, S. 2008. “Queen Bees, Wannabees and Aftaid to Bees: No More ‘Best Enemies’ for Women in the Management?.” British Journal of Management 19: S75–S84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, T. W., L. L. Toussaint, and J. A. Schweiger. 2004. “The Influence of Social Status on Token Women Leaders’ Expectations about Being Leading Male-Dominated Groups.” Sex Roles 50 (5): 401–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, G. N., and M. Beigi. 2016. “The Importance of Worldviews on Women’s Leadership to HRD.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 18 (2): 260–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megheirkouni, M., and M. A. Roomi. 2017. “Women’s Leadership Development in Sport Settings: Factors Influencing the Transformational Learning Experience of Female Managers.” European Journal of Training and Development 41 (5): 467–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., and E. J. Tisdell. 2016. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D. E. 2001a. “Radical Change, the Quiet Way.” Harvard Business Review 79 (9): 92–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D. E. 2001b. Tempered Radicals: How People Use Difference to Inspire Change at Work. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D. E., and M. A. Scully. 1995. “Tempered Radicalism and the Politics of Ambivalence and Change.” Organization Science 6 (5): 585–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton-Small, J. 2017. “What Happens When Women Reach a Critical Mass of Influence.” Time. http://time.com/5016735/when-women-reach-a-critical-mass-of-influence/
   Google Scholar
• Ngunjiri, F. W. 2016. ““I Am Because We Are” Exploring Women’s Leadership Under Ubuntu Worldview.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 18 (2): 223–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K. M., H. V. Ganginis Del Pino, S.-K. Yoo, R. G. Cinamon, and Y.-J. Han. 2014. “Work, Family, Support, and Depression: Employed Mothers in Israel, Korea, and the United States.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 61 (3): 461–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, I., and L. Cho. 1995. “Confucianism and the Korean Family.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 26 (1): 117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, D., J. Miller, and F.-A. Esbensen. 2001. “The Impact of Sex Composition on Gangs and Gang Member Delinquency.” Criminology 39 (2): 411–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peus, C., S. Braun, and K. Knipfer. 2015. “On Becoming a Leader in Asia and America: Empirical Evidence from Women Managers.” Leadership Quarterly 26: 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pololi, L. H., and S. J. Jones. 2010. “Women Faculty: An Analysis of Their Experiences in Academic Medicine and Their Copiting Strategies.” Gender Medicine 7 (5): 438–450.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raymo, J. M., H. Park, Y. Xie, and W. J. Yeung. 2015. “Marriage and Family in East Asia: Continuity and Change.” Annual Review of Sociology 41: 471–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman, L. S., M. van Dellen, and W. Wood. 2011. “How Women Cope: Being a Numerical Minority in a Male-Dominated Profession.” Journal of Social Issues 67 (3): 492–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggiano, N., and T. E. Perry. 2019. “Conducting Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data: Should We, Can We, and How?.” Qualitative Social Work 18 (1): 81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, E. K. 2005. “Beyond Tokenism: The Making of Racially Diverse Feminist Organizations.” Social Problems 52 (2): 232–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, G., W. Huang, and S.-H. C. Han. 2017. “Conceptual Review of Underrepresentation of Women in Senior Leadership Positions from a Perspective of Gendered Social Structure in the Workplace: Implication for HRD Research and Practice.” Human Resource Development Review 16 (1): 35–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, L. D., and K. Aquino. 2013. “Much Ado about Nothing? Observers’ Problematization of Women’s Same-Sex Conflict at Work.” The Academy of Management Perspectives 27 (1): 52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, C., A. Carter, and A. Moore De Peralta. 2020. “Do Servant, Transformational, Transactional, and Passive Avoidant Leadership Styles Influence Mentoring Competencies for Faculty? A Study of A Gender Equity Leadership Development Program.” Human Resource Development Quarterly. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21408.
   Google Scholar
• Sojo, V. E., R. E. Wood, S. A. Wood, and M. A. Wheeler. 2016. “Reporting Requirements, Targets, and Quotas for Women in Leadership.” The Leadership Quarterly 27: 519–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stichman, A. J., K. D. Hassell, and C. A. Archbold. 2010. “Strength in Numbers? A Test of Kanter’s Theory of Tokenism.” Journal of Criminal Justice 38: 633–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torchia, M., A. Calabrò, and M. Huse. 2011. “Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass.” Journal of Business Ethics 102: 299–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turco, C. J. 2010. “Cultural Foundations of Tokenism.” American Sociological Review 75 (6): 894–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. E. 2014. “Gender and Supportive Co-Worker Relations in the Medical Profession.” Gender, Work, and Organization 21 (1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, Wallace, J. E., and Kay, F. M.2012. “Tokenism, Organizational Segregation, and Coworker Relations in Law Firms.” Social Problems59(3): 389–410.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., and M. Shirmohammadi. 2016. “Women Leaders in China: Looking Back and Moving Forward.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 18 (2): 137–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. B., A. Simmons, and E. Umphress. 2019. “It’s Not Black and White: Toward a Contingency Perspective on the Consequences of Being a Token.” Academy of Managemnet Perspective 33 (3): 334–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins-Romesburg, C. A., and R. P. Githens. 2018. “The Psychology of Diversity Resistance and Integration.” Human Resource Development Review 17 (2): 179–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhams, C., H. Xian, and B. Lupton. 2015. ““Women Managers’ Careers in China: Theorizing the Influence of Gender and Collectivism.”.” Human Resource Management 54: 913–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. 2020. The Global Gender Gap Report 2020. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, A. T., and S. J. Correll. 2018. “Combating Gender Bias in Modern Workplace.” In Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, edited by B. J. Risman, C. M. Froyum, and W. J. Scarborough, 509–521, Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, I. 2006. “Jeong Exchange and Collective Leadership in Korean Organizations.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 23 (3): 283–298.
   Google Scholar
• Yardley, S. J., K. M. Watts, J. Pearson, and J. C. Richardson. 2014. “Ethical Issues in the Reuse of Qualitative Data: Perspectives from Literature, Practice, and Participants.” Qualitative Health Research 24 (1): 102–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, J. D. 1991. “Rethinking Tokenism: Looking beyond Numbers.” Gender & Society 5 (2): 178–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, J. D., J. Adams, and H. Prince. 1983. “The Price of a Token.” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 11: 325–337.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, J. D., and P. Aniakudo. 1997. “Outsider within the Firehouse: Subordination and Difference in the Social Interactions of African American Women Firefighters.” Gender & Society 11: 324–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar