The changing landscape of action learning research and practice

References

• We added * to articles identified in the literature review
   Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., R. S. Ramani, and N. Alabduljader. 2018. “What You See is What You Get? Enhancing Methodological Transparency in Management Research.” The Academy of Management Annals 12 (1): 83–110. doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., and A. M. Solarino. 2019. “Transparency and Replicability in Qualitative Research: The Case of Interviews with Elite Informants.” Strategic Management Journal 40: 1291–1315. doi:10.1002/smj.3015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinwall, A., M. Pedler, and P. Radcliff. 2018. “Leadership Development Through Virtual Action Learning: An Evaluation.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 15 (1): 49–51. doi:10.1080/14767333.2017.1414103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Boak, G., J. Gold, and D. Devins. 2020. “Action Learning and Action Research to Alleviate Poverty.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 17 (1): 48–61. doi:10.1080/14767333.2020.1712842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boshyk, Y. 2016. “Some 27 Varieties of Action Learning Approaches Today.” In Presented at the 21^st Annual Global Forum on Action Learning. Stockholm: Leadership and Transformational Change.
   Google Scholar
• Boshyk, Y., A. E. Barker, and R. L. Dilworth. 2010. ”Milestones in the History and Worldwide Evolution of Action Learning.” In Action Learning: History and Evolution, edited by Y. Boshyk, and R. L. Dilworth. 117–204. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• *Breen, J. 2014. “Exploring Criticality in Management Education Through Action Learning.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 11 (1): 4–24. doi:10.1080/14767333.2013.874328.
   Google Scholar
• Brook, C. 2021. “What Does Action Learning Look Like Today?” Action Learning: Research and Practice 18 (2): 89–90. doi:10.1080/14767333.2021.1935058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook, C., and C. Abbott. 2020. “Facilitating the Facilitators of Action Learning in China: Practices and Prospects.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 17 (2): 200–214. doi:10.1080/14767333.2019.1646208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook, C., A. Lawless, and C. Sanyal. 2021. “Adaptive Action Learning: A Refusal to Define.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 18 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1080/14767333.2021.1869165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook, C., and M. Pedler. 2020. “Action Learning in Academic Management Education: A State of the Field Review.” The International Journal of Management Education 18: 100415. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Brook, C., M. Pedler, C. Abbott, and J. Burgoyne. 2016. “On Stopping Doing Those Things That are Not Getting Us to Where We Want to Be: Unlearning, Wicked Problems and Critical Action Learning.” Human Relations 69 (2): 369–389. doi:10.1177/0018726715586243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook, C., M. Pedler, and J. Burgoyne. 2012. “Some Debates and Challenges in the Literature on Action Learning: The State of the Art Since Revans.” Human Resource Development International 15 (3): 269–282. doi:10.1080/13678868.2012.687926.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, U., and K. Trehan. 2018. “Action Learning in East Africa: New Encounters or Impossible Challenges?” Action Learning: Research and Practice 15 (2): 126–138. doi:10.1080/14767333.2018.1462144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Callaghan, D., and H. Collins. 2021. “Adaptive Action Learning in an Online Community: Facilitating a Large Cohort to Deliver Results.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 18 (1): 20–37. doi:10.1080/14767333.2020.1854681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candela, A. G. 2019. “Exploring the Function of Member Checking.” The Qualitative Report 24 (3): 619–628. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cao, R., K. B. Chuah, Y. C. Chau, K. F. Kwong, and M. Y. Law. 2012. “The Role of Facilitators in Project Action Learning Implementation.” The Learning Organization 19 (5): 414–427. doi:10.1108/09696471211239712.
   Google Scholar
• *Cheung, C. K., S. Geng, K. B. Chuah, Y. C. Chau, and K. F. Kwong. 2016. “Organizational Learning in Shop Floor Level.” The Learning Organization 23 (5): 274–298. doi:10.1108/TLO-03-2016-0019.
   Google Scholar
• *Cho, Y., and H.-C. Bong. 2013. Trends and Issues in Action Learning Practice: Lessons from South Korea. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., H.-C. Bong, and H.-S. Kim. 2019. “Examining the Development of Action Learning Practice in South Korea.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 16 (1): 5–22. doi:10.1080/14767333.2018.1533448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., and T. M. Egan. 2009. “Action Learning Research: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework.” Human Resource Development Review 8 (4): 431–462. doi:10.1177/1534484309345656.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., and T. M. Egan. 2013. “Organizational Support for Action Learning in South Korean Organizations.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 24 (2): 185–213. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., S. Park, S. J. Jo, and S. Suh. 2013. “The Landscape of Educational Technology Viewed from the EtR&D Journal.” British Journal of Educational Technology 44 (5): 677–694. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01338.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., and P. Coughlan. 2010. “Notes Toward a Philosophy of Action Learning Research.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 7 (2): 193–203. doi:10.1080/14767333.2010.488330.
   Google Scholar
• *Coghlan, D., and P. Coughlan. 2015. “Effecting Change and Learning in Networks Through Network Action Learning.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 51 (3): 375–400. doi:10.1177/0021886314540210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., and M. Pedler. 2006. “Action Learning Dissertations: Structure, Supervision and Examination.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 3 (2): 127–139. doi:10.1080/14767330600885797.
   Google Scholar
• *Cother, G. 2020. “Developing the Circular Economy in Tasmania.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 17 (1): 108–124. doi:10.1080/14767333.2020.1712850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlan, P., D. Coghlan, C. Rigg, and D. O’Leary. 2021. “Exploring and Exploiting the Dynamics of Networks in Complex Applied Research Projects: A Reflection on Learning in Action.” British Journal of Management 32: 1440–1455. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Csillag, S., and A. L. Hidegh. 2021. “Lessons About Action Learning from Undergraduate Students in Budapest.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 18 (1): 38–51. doi:10.1080/14767333.2020.1843402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickenson, M., J. Burgoyne, and M. Pedler. 2010. “Virtual Action Learning: Practices and Challenges.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 7 (1): 59–72. doi:10.1080/14767330903576978.
   Google Scholar
• *Eaton, A. D., F. Ibáñez-Carrasco, S. L. Craig, S. C. Carusone, M. Montess, G. A. Wells, and G. F. Ginoccio. 2018. “A Blended Learning Curriculum for Training Peer Researchers to Conduct Community-Based Participatory Research.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 15 (2): 139–150. doi:10.1080/14767333.2018.1462143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonstone, J. 2019a. “Beyond Critical Action Learning? Action Learning’s Place in the World.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 16 (2): 136–148. doi:10.1080/14767333.2018.1509837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonstone, J. 2019b. “Is Action Learning Culture Bound? An Exploration.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 16 (3): 223–237. doi:10.1080/14767333.2019.1627777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonstone, J., A. Lawless, and M. Pedler. 2019. “Leadership Development, Wicked Problems and Action Learning: Provocations to a Debate.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 16 (1): 37–51. doi:10.1080/14767333.2019.1568967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Edmonstone, J., and J. M. Robson. 2013. “Blending-In: The Contribution of Action Learning to a Masters Programme in Human Resources in Health.” International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management 13 (1): 61–75. doi:10.1504/IJHRDM.2013.052151.
   Google Scholar
• Garrard, J. 2017. Health Sciences Literature Review Made Easy: The Matrix Method. Ontario, Canada: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, J., and M. Pedler. 2022. “Bridging Research to Practice via Action Learning.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 19 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1080/14767333.2021.2018288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G. 1981. “Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries.” Ectj 29 (2): 75–91. doi:10.1007/BF02766777.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, L., and H. Liew. 2021. “A Bibliometric Overview of the Journal of Workplace Learning.” Journal of Workplace Learning 33 (7): 547–560. doi:10.1108/JWL-01-2021-0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jones, K., S. A. Sambrook, L. Pittaway, A. Henley, and H. Norbury. 2014. “Action Learning: How Learning Transfers from Entrepreneurs to Small Firms.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 11 (2): 131–166. doi:10.1080/14767333.2014.896249.
   Google Scholar
• *Lawless, A. 2008. “Action Learning as Legitimate Peripheral Participation.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 5 (2): 117–129. doi:10.1080/14767330802185632.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M., A. E. Bryman, and T. F. Liao. 2003. The Sage Encyclopedia in Social Science Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1986. “But is It Rigorous? Trustworthiness and Authenticity in Naturalistic Evaluation.” New Directions for Evaluation 30: 73–81. doi:10.1002/ev.1427.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, M. J. 2011. Optimizing the Power of Action Learning. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Nicholas Brealey.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, B. 2021. “Adapting Action Learning in the Legal Profession: The Role of the ‘Provided’ Problem.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 18 (1): 67–74. doi:10.1080/14767333.2021.1869176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McGrath, H., and T. O’Toole. 2016. “Using Action Research and Action Learning for Entrepreneurial Network Capability Development.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 13 (2): 118–138. doi:10.1080/14767333.2016.1162136.
   Google Scholar
• *McNabb, D., and M. Webster. 2010. “Qualities and Practices of Professional Social Work Leadership in an Interdisciplinary Mental Health Service: An Action Learning Approach.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 7 (1): 41–57. doi:10.1080/14767330903576846.
   Google Scholar
• *Mughal, F., C. Gatrell, and V. Stead. 2018. “Cultural Politics and the Role of the Action Learning Facilitator: Analysing the Negotiation of Critical Action Learning in the Pakistani MBA Through a Bourdieusian Lens.” Management Learning 49 (1): 69–85. doi:10.1177/2F1350507617740273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ogun, A., R. Braggs, and J. Gold. 2020. “Social Action Learning: Applicability to Comrades in Adversity in Nigeria.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 17 (1): 84–99. doi:10.1080/14767333.2020.1712848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Olsen, A., and C. Carter. 2016. “Responding to the Needs of People with Learning Disabilities Who Have Been Raped: Co-Production in Action.” Tizard Learning Disability Review 21 (1): 30–38. doi:10.1108/TLDR-04-2015-0017.
   Google Scholar
• *Olsson, A., C. Wadell, P. Odenrick, and M. N. Bergendahl. 2010. “An Action Learning Method for Increased Innovation Capability in Organisations.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 7 (2): 167–179. doi:10.1080/14767333.2010.488328.
   Google Scholar
• Pasmore, W. A., R. W. Woodman, and A. L. Simmons. 2008. ”Toward a More Rigorous, Reflective and Relevant Science of Collaborative Management Research.” In Handbook of Collaborative Management Research, edited by W. A. Pasmore, R. W. Woodman, A. L. Simmons. A. B. (Rami) Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne, and N. Adler, 567–582. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Paton, S., R. Chia, and G. Burt. 2014. “Relevance or ‘Relevate’? How University Business Schools Can Add Value Through Reflexively Learning from Strategic Partnerships with Business.” Management Learning 45 (3): 267–288. doi:10.1177/2F1350507613479541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedler, M., and C. Abbott. 2013. Facilitating Action Learning: A Practitioner’s Guide. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedler, M., and C. Brook. 2017. “The Innovation Paradox: A Selective Review of the Literature on Action Learning and Innovation.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 14 (3): 216–229. doi:10.1080/14767333.2017.1326877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedler, M., J. Burgoyne, and C. Brook. 2005. “What Has Action Learning Learned to Become?.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 2 (1): 49–68. doi:10.1080/14767330500041251.
   Google Scholar
• Pedler, M., B. Hauser, and G. Caulat. 2014. “Reflections on Working with Virtual Action Learning.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 11 (1): 88–97. doi:10.1080/14767333.2013.874776.
   Google Scholar
• *Pittaway, L., C. Missing, N. Hudson, and D. Maragh. 2009. “Entrepreneurial Learning Through Action: A Case Study of the Six-Squared Program.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 6 (3): 265–288. doi:10.1080/14767330903299480.
   Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F., and C. T. Beck. 2013. Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Radclff, P. 2017. “Virtual Action Learning: A Pilot in Building Leadership Capacity.” Action Learning: Research & Practice 14 (1): 72–82. doi:10.1080/14767333.2017.1414103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rae, D. 2009. “Connecting Entrepreneurial and Action Learning in Student-Initiated New Business Ventures: The Case of SPEED.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 6 (3): 289–303. doi:10.1080/14767330903301799.
   Google Scholar
• Raelin, J. 2009. “Seeking Conceptual Clarity in the Action Modalities.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 6 (1): 17–24. doi:10.1080/14767330902731269.
   Google Scholar
• Raelin, J. 2021. “Action Learning as a Human Resource Development Resource to Realize Collective Leadership.” Human Resource Development Review 20 (3): 282–288. doi:10.1177/15344843211022600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, P., and W. R. Torbert. 2001. “The Action Turn: Toward a Transformational Social Science.” Concepts and Transformation 6 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1075/cat.6.1.02rea.
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. W. 1982. The Origins and Growth of Action Learning. Bromley, UK: Chartwell-Bratt.
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. W. 2011. ABC of Action Learning. Surrey, England: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• *Rigg, C., and K. Trehan. 2008. “Critical Reflection in the Workplace: Is It Just Too Difficult?” Journal of European Industrial Training 32 (5): 374–384. doi:10.1108/03090590810877094.
   Google Scholar
• *Robertson, J., H. Le Sueur, and N. Terblanche. 2021. “Reflective Practice During Action Learning in Management Development Programmes.” European Journal of Training and Development 45 (2/3): 149–165. doi:10.1108/EJTD-04-2020-0063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, C., L. Nichol, C. Elliott, S. Sambrook, and J. Stewart. 2020. “The Role of HRD in Bridging the Research-Practice Gap: The Case of Learning and Development.” Human Resource Development International 23 (2): 108–124. doi:10.1080/13678868.2019.1667691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., and P. Tosey, ed. 2015. Handbook of Research Methods on Human Resource Development. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, K. S. 2017. “An Integrative Framework for Problem-Based Learning and Action Learning: Promoting Evidence-Based Design and Evaluation in Leadership Development.” Human Resource Development Review 16 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1177/1534484317693090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Smith, S., and L. Smith. 2017. “Assessing the Value of Action Learning for Social Enterprises and Charities.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 14 (3): 230–242. doi:10.1080/14767333.2017.1288081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stead, V. 2014. “The Gendered Power Relations of Action Learning: A Critical Analysis of Women’s Reflections on a Leadership Development Programme.” Human Resource Development International 17 (4): 416–437. doi:10.1080/13678868.2014.928137.
   Google Scholar
• *Stephens, S., and M. Margey. 2015. “Action Learning and Executive Education: Achieving Credible Personal, Practitioner and Organizational Learning.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 12 (1): 37–51. doi:10.1080/14767333.2014.993592.
   Google Scholar
• *Thornton, K., and P. Yoong. 2011. “The Role of the Blended Action Learning Facilitator: An Enabler of Learning and a Trusted Inquisitor.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 8 (2): 129–146. doi:10.1080/14767333.2011.581021.
   Google Scholar
• Tosey, P., and J. Marshall. 2017. “The Demise of Inquiry-Based HRD Programmes in the UK: Implications for the Field.” Human Resource Development International 20 (5): 393–402. doi:10.1080/13678868.2017.1329368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varpio, L., E. Paradis, S. Uijtdehaage, and M. Young. 2020. “The Distinctions Between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework.” Academic Medicine 95 (7): 989–994. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Vince, R., G. Abbey, M. Langenhan, and D. Bell. 2018. “Finding Critical Action Learning Through Paradox: The Role of Action Learning in the Suppression and Stimulation of Critical Reflection.” Management Learning 49 (1): 86–106. doi:10.1177/1350507617706832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, R., J. McCray, and D. Board. 2017. “Bourdieu’s Habitus and Field: Implications on the Practice and Theory of Critical Action Learning.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 14 (2): 104–119. doi:10.1080/14767333.2017.1296409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, V. J. 2004. “Inspecting Cases Against Revans’ ‘Gold Standard’ of Action Learning.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 1 (1): 11–27. doi:10.1080/1476733042000187592.
   Google Scholar
• *Wilson, H., M. Tucker, C. Hannibal, and Z. Qu. 2021. “Learning Together, Learning Apart: Integrated Action Learning Through a Socio-Technical Systems Lens.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 18 (1): 5–19. doi:10.1080/14767333.2020.1843403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wyton, P., and R. Payne. 2014. “Exploring the Development of Competence in Lean Management Through Action Learning Groups: A Study of the Introduction of Lean to a Facilities Management Function.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 11 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/14767333.2013.873015.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, R. K., and M. J. Marquardt. 2015. “(Re) Interpreting Action, Learning, and Experience: Integrating Action Learning and Experiential Learning for HRD.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 26 (1): 81–107. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Yip, J., and J. A. Raelin. 2011. “Threshold Concepts and Modalities for Teaching Leadership Practice.” Management Learning 43 (3): 333–354. doi:10.1177/1350507611422476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Yoon, H. J., Y. Cho, and H. C. Bong. 2012. “The Impact of a Dual-Project Action Learning Program: A Case of a Large IT Manufacturing Company in South Korea.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 9 (3): 225–246. doi:10.1080/14767333.2012.711237.
   Google Scholar
• *Yström, A., S. Ollila, M. Agogué, and D. Coghlan. 2019. “The Role of a Learning Approach in Building an Interorganizational Network Aiming for Collaborative Innovation.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 55 (1): 27–49. doi:10.1177/0021886318793383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar