Performance analysis of hyperspherical colour sharpening method for IRS satellite images

References

• Barnsley, M. J., Barr, S. L., Hamid, A., Muller, J. P., Sadler, G. J. and Shepherd, J. S. Analytical tools to monitor urban areas, in ‘Geographical information handling: research and applications’, (ed. P. M. Mather), 147–184; 1993 (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex).
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. R. and Cowen, D. C. Remote sensing of urban/suburban infrastructure and socio-economic attributes. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens., 1999, 65, 611–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, C. and Van Genderen, J. L. Review article multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications. Int. J. Rem. Sens., 1998, 19, (5), 823–854. doi: 10.1080/014311698215748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, S., Shi, W. Z., Liu, J., Zhu, G. X. and Tian, J. W. Multisource image fusion method using support value transform. IEEE T. Image Process., 2007, 16, (7), 1831–1839. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2007.896687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varshney, P. K. Multisensor data fusion. Electron. Commun. Eng. J., 1997, 9, (6), 245–253. doi: 10.1049/ecej:19970602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, B., Wulder, M. A. and White, J. C. An approach using Dempster–Shafer theory to fuse spatial data and satellite image derived crown metrics for estimation of forest stand leading species. Inform. Fusion, 2013, 14, (4), 384–395. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2012.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carper, W. J., Lillesand, T. M. and Kiefer, R. W. The use of intensity-hue-saturation transformations for merging SPOT panchromatic and multi-spectral image data. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens., 1990, 56, (4), 459–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavez, P. S., Sides, S. C. and Anderson, J. A. Comparison of three different methods to merge multiresolution and multispectral data- Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens., 1991, 57, (3), 295–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrabel, J. Multispectral imagery band sharpening study. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens., 1996, 62, (9), 1075–1084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R. L. and Wang, J. A wavelet based algorithm for pan sharpening Landsat 7 imagery. Proceeding of International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS 2001) 9–13 July 2001 Sydney, Australia, 2001, Vol. 2, pp. 849–851.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. and Hong, G. An IHS and wavelet integrated approach to improve pan-sharpening visual quality of natural colour IKONOS and QuickBird images. Inform. Fusion, 2005, 6, (3), 225–234. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2004.06.009
   Google Scholar
• Ling, Y., Ehlers, M., Usery, E. L. and Madden, M. FFT-enhanced IHS transform method for fusing high-resolution satellite images. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Rem. Sens., 2007, 61, (6), 381–392. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Yu, X. and Zhang, L. A remote sensing image fusion algorithm based on constrained nonnegative matrix factorization. IEEE Cong. Image Sig. Process. (CISP'08), 2008, 4, 672–676. doi: 10.1109/CISP.2008.147
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, S., Shi, W. Z., Liu, J. and Tian, J. Remote sensing image fusion using multiscale mapped LS-SVM. IEEE T. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 2008, 46, (5), 1313–1322. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.912737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padwick, C., Deskevich, M., Pacifici, F. and Smallwood, S. World-View-2 pan-sharpening. Proc. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) Annual Conference on ‘Opportunities for Emerging Geospatial Technologies’, San Diego, California, USA, 26–30 April, 2010, Vol. 2, pp. 740–753.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, Q., Borders, B. and Madden, M. High-resolution satellite image fusion using regression kriging. Int. J. Rem. Sens., 2010, 31, (7), 1857–1876. doi: 10.1080/01431160902927937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. W., Van-Aardt, J. A. N. and Ahmed, F. B. Image fusion for enhanced forest structural assessment. Int. J. Rem. Sens., 2011, 32, (1), 243–266. doi: 10.1080/01431160903463684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amolins, K., Zhang, Y. and Dare, P. Wavelet based image fusion techniques – an introduction review and comparison. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Rem. Sens., 2007, 62, (4), 249–263. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalan, S. and Sokhi, B. S. Comparison of different pan-sharpening methods for spectral characteristic preservation: multi-temporal CARTOSAT-1 and IRS-P6 LISS-IV imagery. Int. J. Rem. Sens., 2012, 33, (18), 5629–5643. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2012.666811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf, S., Brabyn, L. and Hicks, B. J. Image data fusion for the remote sensing of freshwater environments. Appl. Geogr., 2012, 32, (2), 619–628. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zha, Y., Gao, J. and Ni, S. Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int. J. Rem. Sens., 2003, 24, 583–594. doi: 10.1080/01431160304987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H. A new index for delineating built-up land features in satellite imagery. Int. J. Rem. Sens., 2008, 29, 4269–4276. doi: 10.1080/01431160802039957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamura, M., Jayamana, S. and Tsujiko, Y. Relation between social and environmental conditions in Colombo Sri Lanka and the urban index estimated by satellite remote sensing data. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Rem. Sens., 1996, 31, (B7), 321–326.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, H. M. and Chen, X. L. Use of normalized difference bareness index in quickly mapping bare areas from TM/ETM+. Proc. 2005 IEEE ‘International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium’, Seoul, Korea, 25–29 July 2005, 3, pp. 1666–1668.
   Google Scholar
• Rikimaru, A. and Miyatake, S. Development of forest canopy density mapping and monitoring model using indices of vegetation, bare soil and shadow. Proc. 18th Asian Conf. on ‘Remote Sensing (ACRS)’, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 20–25 October 1997, Section 6, Article No. FR97-5, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Thanapura, P. and Helder, D. L., Burckhard, S., Warmath, E., O’Neill, M. and Galster, D. Mapping urban land cover using QuickBird NDVI and GIS spatial modeling for runoff coefficient determination. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens., 2007, 73, (1), 57–65. doi: 10.14358/PERS.73.1.57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri, H., Beecham, S., Anderson, S. and Nagler, P. High spatial resolution world view-2 imagery for mapping NDVI and its relationship to temporal urban landscape evapotranspiration factors. Rem. Sens., 2014, 6, (1), 580–602. doi: 10.3390/rs6010580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers, M., Klonus, S., Johan, A. P. and Rosso, P. Multi-sensor image fusion for pansharpening in remote sensing. Int. J. Imag. Data Fus., 2010, 1, (1), 25–45. doi: 10.1080/19479830903561985
   Google Scholar
• Gangkofner, U. G. and Holcomb, D. W. HP Resolution Merge. In ‘ERDAS IMAGINE Help Leica Geosystems Geospatial Imaging LLC’, 2010. https://hexagongeospatial.fluidtopics.net
   Google Scholar
• Dong, J., Zhuang, D., Huang, Y. and Fu, J. Advances in multi-sensor data fusion: algorithms and applications. Sensors, 2009, 9, (10), 7771–7784. doi: 10.3390/s91007771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Ziou, D., Armenakis, C., Li, D. and Li, Q. A comparative analysis of image fusion methods. IEEE T. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 2005, 43, (6), 1391–1402. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2005.846874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. Information theoretic criteria for image quality assessment based on natural science statistics, MSc thesis, University of Waterloo, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ayhan, E. and Atay, G. Spectral and spatial quality analysis in pan sharpening process. J. Indian Soc. Rem. Sens., 2012, 40, (3), 379–388. doi: 10.1007/s12524-011-0185-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuhendra, A. I., Sumantyo, J. T. S. and Kuze, H. Assessment of pan-sharpening methods applied to image fusion of remotely sensed multi-band data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 2012, 18, 165–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. Methods for image fusion quality assessment – a review comparison and analysis. Int. Arch. Photogr. Rem. Sens. Spat. Inform. Sci., 2008, 37, 1101–1109.
   Google Scholar
• Gangkofner, U. G., Pradhan, P. S. and Holcomb, D. W. Optimizing the high-pass filter addition technique for image fusion. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens., 2008, 74, (9), 1107–1118. doi: 10.14358/PERS.74.9.1107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald, L. Quality of high resolution synthesized images: is there a simple criterion? Proc. Int. Conf. on ‘Fusion of earth data: Merging point measurements raster maps and remotely sensed images’, France Nice France, 2000, pp. 99–103.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. and Wald, L. Comparing distances for quality assessment of fused images. Proc. 26th ‘EARSeL Symposium Varsovie: Poland-2006', 2007, pp. 101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Riyahi, R., Kleinn, C. and Fuchs, H. Comparison of different image fusion techniques for individual tree crown identification using QuickBird images. Proceeding of ISPRS Hannover Workshop, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Vijayaraj, V., O’Hara, C. G. and Younan, N. H. Quality analysis of pansharpened images. Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS’04), 2004, Vol. 1, pp. 85–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. and Bovik, A. C. A universal image quality index. IEEE Lett. Signal Process., 2002, 9, (3), 81–84. doi: 10.1109/97.995823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald, L. Data fusion: definitions and architecture: fusion of images of different spatial resolutions; 2002 (Les Presses de l'École des Mines, Paris).
   Google Scholar
• Yakhdani, M. F. and Azizi, A. Quality assessment of image fusion techniques for multi-sensor high resolution satellite images (case study: IRS-P5 and IRS-P6 satellite images). International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Vienma, Austria, 2010, pp. 204–209.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Jing, Z., Yang, X. and Sun, S. Color transfer based remote sensing image fusion using non-separable wavelet frame transform. Pattern Recogn. Lett., 2005, 26, (13), 2006–2014. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar