Automatic text classification using BPLion-neural network and semantic word processing

References

• Iwayama M, Tokunaga T. Hierarchical Bayesian clustering for automatic text classification. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2; 1995. p.1322–1327.
   Google Scholar
• Joachims T. Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. Proceedings of 10th European Conference on Machine Learning; 1998. p. 137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal CC, Zhai CX. Mining text data. New York: Springer US; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Nogueira TM, Rezende SO, Camargo HA. On the Use of fuzzy rules to text document classification. Proceedings of the International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems; 2010. p. 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Pedersen JO. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorisation. Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning; 1997. p. 412–420.
   Google Scholar
• Slobodan Beliga R, Croatia SM-I. Non-standard words as features for text categorization . Proceedings of International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics; 2014. p. 1165–1169.
   Google Scholar
• Cruse D. Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Ltu X. A re-examination of text categorization methods. Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval; 1999. p. 4249.
   Google Scholar
• Ittner DI, Lewis DD, Ahn DD. Text categorization of low-quality images. Proceedings of the Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval; 1995. p. 301–315.
   Google Scholar
• Jain A, Chandrasekaran B. Dimensionality and sample size considerations in pattern recognition practice In: Krishnaiah PR, Kanal LN, editors. Handbook of Statistics, vol.2, Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1982. p. 201–213.
   Google Scholar
• Engel brecht AP, Brits R. A clustering approach to incremental learning for feedforward neural networks. Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 3; 2001. p. 2019–2024.
   Google Scholar
• Ikonomakis M, Kotsiants S, Tampakas V. Text classification using machine learning techniques. WSEAS Trans Comput. 2005;4(8):966–974.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Huang L, Murphey YL. Incremental learning for text document classification. Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks; 2007. p. 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastiani F. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput Surv. 2002;34(1):1–47. doi: 10.1145/505282.505283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan A, Baharudin B, Lee LH, et al. A review of machine learning algorithms for text-documents classification. J Adv Inform Technol. February 2010;1(1):4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kim S-B, Han K-S, Rim H-C, et al. Some effective techniques for naive Bayes text classification. IEEE Trans on Knowl and Data Eng. 2006;18(11):1457–1466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onan A, Korukoglu S, Bulut H. Ensemble of keyword extraction methods and classifiers in text classification. Expert Syst Appl. 2016;57:232–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang B, He H, Baggenstoss PM, et al. A Bayesian classification approach using class-specific features for text categorization. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2016;28(6):1602–1606. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2016.2522427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiassi M, Olschimke M, Moon B, et al. Automated text classification using a dynamic artificial neural network model. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39(12):10967–10976. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Xu B, Xu J, et al. Semantic expansion using word embedding clustering and convolutional neural network for improving short text classification. Neurocomputing. 2016;174:806–814. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Oles FJ. Text categorization based on regularized linear classification methods. Inf Retr. 2001;4(1):5–31. doi: 10.1023/A:1011441423217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam SA, Setiono R. A comparative study of centroid-based, neighbourhood-based and statistical approaches for effective document categorization. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'02), vol. 4, no. 4; 2002. p. 235–238.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad RS, Kulkarni UV, Prasad JR. Machine learning in evolving connectionist text summarizer. 2009 3rd International Conference on Anti-counterfeiting, Security, and Identification in Communication, Hong Kong; 2009. p. 539–543.
   Google Scholar
• Askarzadeh A, Rezazadeh A. Artificial neural network training using a new efficient optimization algorithm. Appl Soft Comput. 2013;13:1206–1213. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green II RC, Wang L, Alam M. Training neural networks using central force optimization and particle swarm optimization: insights and comparisons. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39(1):555–563. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagwani NK. A comment on ‘A similarity measure for text classification and clustering’. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2015;27(9):2589–2590. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2015.2451616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong Fung GP, Xu Yu J, Lu H. Discriminative category matching: efficient text classification for huge document collections. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi RG, de Andrade Lopes A, Rezende SO. Optimization and label propagation in bipartite heterogeneous networks to improve transductive classification of texts. Inf Process Manag. March 2016;52(2): 217–257. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2015.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolores Molina-González M, Martínez-Cámara E, Teresa Martín-Valdivia M, et al. A Spanish semantic orientation approach to domain adaptation for polarity classification. Inf Process Manag. July 2015;51(4):520–531. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman A, Javed K, Babri HA. Feature selection based on a normalized difference measure for text classification. Inf Process Manag. March 2017;53(2):473–489. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2016.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Han K, Rim H, et al. Some effective techniques for naïve Bayes text classification. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2006;18(11):1457–1466. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2006.180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Yoshida T, Tang X. Text classification using multi-word features. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics; 2007. p. 3519–3524.
   Google Scholar
• Porter MF. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program. 1980;14(3):130–137. doi: 10.1108/eb046814
   Google Scholar
• Elberrichi Z, Rahmoun A, Bentaalah MA. Using WordNet for text categorization . Int Arab J Inform Technol. 2008;5(1):16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller G. Nouns in WordNet: A lexical inheritance system. Int J Lexicography. 1990;3(4):245–256. doi: 10.1093/ijl/3.4.245
   Google Scholar
• Dash M, Liu H. Feature selection for classification. Intell Data Anal. 1997;1(1–4):131–156. doi: 10.1016/S1088-467X(97)00008-5
   Google Scholar
• Harper PR. A review and comparison of classification algorithms for medical decision making. Health Policy. 2005;71(3):315–331. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.05.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajakumar BR. Lion algorithm for standard and large scale bilinear system identification: a global optimization based on Lion’s social behavior. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC); 2014. p. 2116–2123.
   Google Scholar
• Fu L, Hsu H, Principe CJ. Incremental backpropagation learning networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1996;7(3):757–761. doi: 10.1109/72.501732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 20Newsgroups data from http://qwone.com/~jason/20Newsgroups/
   Google Scholar
• Reuters data from https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/machine-learning-databases/reuters21578-mld/
   Google Scholar
• Ke W. Least information document representation for automated text classification. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 49, no 1; 2012. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Song W, Liang JZ, Park SC. Fuzzy control GA with a novel hybrid semantic similarity strategy for text clustering. Inf Sci (NY). 2014;273:156–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigam K, Mccallum AK, Thrun S, et al. Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM. Mach Learn. 2000;39:103–134. doi: 10.1023/A:1007692713085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar