A fully automatic methodology for MRI brain tumour detection and segmentation

References

• Wehrl HF, Amend M, Thielcke A. Multimodal imaging and image fusion. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 491–507. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42202-2_17.
   Google Scholar
• SonÄŸur C, Top M. Regional clustering of medical imaging technologies. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;61:333–343. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563216302278. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James AP, Dasarathy BV. Medical image fusion: a survey of the state of the art. Inf Fusion. 2014;19:4–19. Special issue on information fusion in medical image computing and systems. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566253513001450. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karthik R, Menaka R. Computer-aided detection and characterization of stroke lesion a short review on the current state-of-the art methods. Imaging Sci J. 2018;66(1):1–22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13682199.2017.1370879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somasundaram K, Kalavathi P. Brain segmentation in magnetic resonance human head scans using multi-seeded region growing. Imaging Sci J. 2014;62(5):273–284. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1179/1743131X13Y.0000000068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson C, Lajish V, Rajamani K. A novel skull stripping and enhancement algorithm for the improved brain tumor segmentation using mathematical morphology. Int J Image Graph Signal Process. 2016;8(7):59–66. doi: 10.5815/ijigsp.2016.07.07
   Google Scholar
• Kalavathi P, Prasath VBS. Methods on skull stripping of MRI head scan images – a review. J Digit Imaging. 2016;29(3):365–379. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9847-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz B, Durdu A, Emlik GD. A new method for skull stripping in brain MRI using multistable cellular neural networks. Neural Comput Appl. 2018;29(8):79–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2834-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiebocka-Wiek J. Skull stripping for MRI images using morphological operators. In: Saeed K, Homenda W, editors. Computer information systems and industrial management; Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 172–182
   Google Scholar
• Chaddad A, Tanougast C. Quantitative evaluation of robust skull stripping and tumor detection applied to axial mr images. Brain Inform. 2016;3(1):53–61. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40708-016-0033-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Subudhi A, Jena J, Sabut S. Extraction of brain from MRI images by skull stripping using histogram partitioning with maximum entropy divergence. 2016 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP); Melmaruvathur; April; 2016. p. 0931–0935.
   Google Scholar
• Chansuparp M, Rodtook A, Rasmequan S, et al. The automated skull stripping of brain magnetic resonance images using the integrated method. 2015 8th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON); Pattaya; Nov; 2015. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Chen YS, Chang HH. Brain extraction based on an improved charged fluid model in MRI. In: Goh J, editor. The 15th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering; Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2014. p. 597–600.
   Google Scholar
• Duy NHM, Duy NM, Truong MTN, et al. Accurate brain extraction using active shape model and convolutional neural networks. CoRR. 2018;abs/1802.01268. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01268.
   Google Scholar
• Menze BH, Jakab A, Bauer S, et al. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (brats). IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34(10):1993–2024. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao CH, Naganjaneyulu PV, Prasad KS. Brain tumor detection and segmentation using conditional random field. 2017 IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference (IACC); Hyderabad; Jan; 2017. p. 807–810.
   Google Scholar
• Roy S, Bhattacharyya D, Bandyopadhyay SK, et al. An improved brain mr image binarization method as a preprocessing for abnormality detection and features extraction. Front Comput Sci. 2017;11(4):717–727. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-016-5129-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman K, Rajpoot K. Brain tumor classification from multi-modality mri using wavelets and machine learning. Pattern Anal Appl. 2017;20(3):871–881. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-017-0597-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabria I, Gondra I. Mri segmentation fusion for brain tumor detection. Inf Fusion. 2017;36:1–9. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566253516301142. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somwanshi D, Kumar A, Sharma P, et al. An efficient brain tumor detection from mri images using entropy measures. 2016 International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE); Jaipur; Dec; 2016. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao Z, Huang R, Ding Y, et al. A deep learning-based segmentation method for brain tumor in mr images. 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Computational Advances in Bio and Medical Sciences (ICCABS); Atlanta; Oct; 2016. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Mohsen H, El-Dahshan ESA, El-Horbaty ESM, et al. Classification using deep learning neural networks for brain tumors. Future Comput Inform J. 2017;3(1):68–71. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2314728817300636. doi: 10.1016/j.fcij.2017.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Crimi A, Bakas S, Kuijf H, et al. Brainlesion: Glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries. In: Third International Workshop, BrainLes 2017, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2017; 2017 September 14; Quebec City, QC; revised selected papers. Vol. 10670. Springer; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kamnitsas K, Bai W, Ferrante E, et al. Ensembles of multiple models and architectures for robust brain tumour segmentation. In: Crimi A, Bakas S, Kuijf H, et al., editors. Brainlesion: glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries; Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 450–462.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Shen L. Deep learning based multimodal brain tumor diagnosis. In: Crimi A, Bakas S, Kuijf H, et al., editors. Brainlesion: glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries; Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 149–158.
   Google Scholar
• Soltaninejad M, Zhang L, Lambrou T, et al. Mri brain tumor segmentation and patient survival prediction using random forests and fully convolutional networks. In: Crimi A, Bakas S, Kuijf H, et al., editors. Brainlesion: glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries; Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 204–215.
   Google Scholar
• Isensee F, Kickingereder P, Wick W, et al. Brain tumor segmentation and radiomics survival prediction: contribution to the brats 2017 challenge. 2017 International MICCAI BraTS Challenge. Cham: Springer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE, A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2017;42:60–88. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafiee J, Rafiee M, Prause N, et al. Wavelet basis functions in biomedical signal processing. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(5):6190–6201. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417410012881. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Singh OP, Nagaria D. Analysis and comparison of wavelet transforms for denoising mri image. Biomed Pharmacol. 2017;10(2):831–836. doi: 10.13005/bpj/1174
   Google Scholar
• Bartušek K, Přinosil J, Smékal Z. Wavelet-based de-noising techniques in mri. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011;104(3):480–488. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Ji Z, Zhang Y. Brain mri image segmentation based on learning local variational Gaussian mixture models. Neurocomputing. 2016;204:189–197. Big Learning in Social Media Analytics. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231216300947. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta L, Sortrakul T. A Gaussian-mixture-based image segmentation algorithm. Pattern Recognit. 1998;31(3):315–325. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031320397000459. doi: 10.1016/S0031-3203(97)00045-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu ZL, Su YL, Ye M, et al. An adaptive level set method for serial image segmentation. Imaging Sci J. 2012;60(6):321–328. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1179/136821910X12863757400448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shensa MJ. The discrete wavelet transform: wedding the a trous and Mallat algorithms. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 1992;40(10):2464–2482. doi: 10.1109/78.157290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh D, Garg D, Pannu HS. Efficient landsat image fusion using fuzzy and stationary discrete wavelet transform. Imaging Sci J. 2017;65(2):108–114. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13682199.2017.1289629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekaoui S, Tchoketchkebir S, Ghoumid K. Efficient measurements of the diameter of the human artery using super-resolution imaging technique based on multi-scale wavelet analysis. Modelling in Medicine and Biology X; Vol. 17; Hungary; 2013. p. 145.
   Google Scholar
• Arora J, Khatter K, Tushir M. Performance assessment for clustering techniques for image segmentation. Singapore: Springer; 2018. p. 121–129. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6614-6-13.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen TM, Wu QMJ. Online feature selection based on fuzzy clustering and its applications. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2016;24(6):1294–1306. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2015.2513091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngatchou A, Bitjoka L, Mfoumou E, et al. Robust and fast segmentation based on fuzzy clustering combined with unsupervised histogram analysis. IEEE Intell Syst. 2017;32(5):6–13. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2017.3711645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan JF, Bhuiyan SM. Weighted entropy for segmentation evaluation. Opt Laser Technol. 2014;57:236–242. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030399213002661. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guido RC. A tutorial review on entropy-based handcrafted feature extraction for information fusion. Inf Fusion. 2018;41:161–175. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566253517303846. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2017.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De A, Bhattacharjee AK, Chanda CK, et al. Mri segmentation using entropy maximization and hybrid particle swarm optimization with wavelet mutation. 2011 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies; Mumbai; Dec; 2011. p. 362–367.
   Google Scholar
• Menze BH, Jakab A, Bauer S, et al. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (brats). IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34(10):1993–2024. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reza S, Iftekharuddin K. Improved brain tumor tissue segmentation using texture features. Proceedings MICCAI BraTS (Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge); 2014. p. 27–30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694
   Google Scholar
• Shaikh M, Anand G, Acharya G, et al. Brain tumor segmentation using dense fully convolutional neural network. International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 309–319.
   Google Scholar