On the application of remote sensing towards the estimation of cultivated land lost to urbanization

References

• Xiao Y, Zhan Q. A review of remote sensing applications in urban planning and management in China. In: 2009 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event. IEEE; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• UN. World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision-highlights. UN; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Balogun IA, Adeyewa DZ, Balogun AA, et al. Analysis of urban expansion and land use changes in akure, Nigeria, using remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) techniques. J Geogr. 2011;4(9):533–541.
   Google Scholar
• Hq X, Xq W, Gr X. A remote sensing and gis integrated study on urbanization with its impact on arable lands: Fuqing City, Fujian Province, China. J Land Degrad Dev. 2000;11(4):301–314. doi: 10.1002/1099-145X(200007/08)11:4<301::AID-LDR392>3.0.CO;2-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sothe C, Almeida C, Liesenberg V, et al. Evaluating sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data to map sucessional forest stages in a subtropical forest in southern Brazil. Remote Sens (Basel). 2017;9(8):838. doi: 10.3390/rs9080838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal B. Urbanization and the decline of agricultural land in Pokhara sub-metropolitan city, Nepal. J Agric Sci. 2012;5(1):54–65.
   Google Scholar
• Gul K, MinAllah N, Junaid A, et al. Performance analysis of object oriented remote sensing techniques for forest detection in Pakistan. Sindh Univ Res J. 2016;48(3):511–516.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed A, Muaz M, Ali M, et al. Comparing pixel-based classifiers for detecting tobacco crops in north-west Pakistan. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Weih RC, Riggan N. Object-based classification vs. pixel-based classification, comparative importance of multi-resolution imagery. Int Archiv Photogramm Remote Sens. 2010;38(4):C7.
   Google Scholar
• Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, et al. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2004;58(3–4):239–258. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Jia L. A comparison of pixel-based and object-based land cover classification methods in an arid/semi-arid environment of northwestern China. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebuv MN. A comparative assessment between object and pixel-based classification approaches for land use/land cover mapping using spot 5 imagery. Geocarto Int. 2014;29(4):351–369. doi:10.1080/10106049.2013.768300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dronova I. Object-based image analysis in wetland research: a review. Remote Sens (Basel). 2015;7(5):6380–6413. Available from: http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/7/5/6380. doi: 10.3390/rs70506380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa H, Foody GM, Boyd DS. Supervised methods of image segmentation accuracy assessment in land cover mapping. Remote Sens Environ. 2018;205:338–351. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2010;65(1):2–16. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Ming D, Xu L, et al. Stratified object-oriented image classification based on remote sensing image scene division. J Spectrosc. 2018;2018:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2018/3918954
   Google Scholar
• Herold M, Scepan J, Mller A, et al. Object-oriented mapping and analysis of urban land use/cover using ikonos data. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Darwish A, Leukert K, Reinhardt W. Image segmentation for the purpose of object-based classification. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ma L, Li M, Ma X, et al. A review of supervised object-based land-cover image classification. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2017;130:277–293. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duro DC, Franklin SE, Dub MG. A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using spot-5 HRG imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 2012;118:259–272. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte AS, Koppa J, Fredrickson EL, et al. Comparison of nearest neighbor and rule- based decision tree classification in an object-oriented environment. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kindu M, Schneider T, Teketay D, et al. Land use/land cover change analysis using object-based classification approach in Munessa–Shashemene landscape of the Ethiopian highlands. Remote Sens (Basel). 2013;5(5):2411–2435. doi: 10.3390/rs5052411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Q, Wu W, Xia T, et al. Exploring the use of Google earth imagery and object-based methods in land use/cover mapping. Remote Sens (Basel). 2013;5(11):6026–6042. doi: 10.3390/rs5116026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimble. eCognition-reference book. eCognition; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Manandhar R, Odeh I, Ancev T. Improving the accuracy of land use and land cover classification of landsat data using post-classification enhancement. Remote Sens (Basel). 2009;1(3):330–344. doi: 10.3390/rs1030330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran S. Improving classification accuracy of spectrally similar urban classes by using object-oriented classification techniques: a case study of New York city. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS); 2010. Available from http://www.proceedings.com/09222.html
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed O, Mohammed O, Brahim A, et al. Content-based image retrieval using convolutional neural networks. In: First international conference on real time intelligent systems. Casablanca, Morocco: Springer; 2017. p. 463–476.
   Google Scholar
• Pal M, Mather PM. Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens. 2005;26(5):1007–1011. doi: 10.1080/01431160512331314083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouhda M, El Asnaoui K, Ouanan M, et al. Using image segmentation in content based image retrieval method. In: International conference on advanced information technology, services and systems. Tangier, Morocco: Springer; 2017. p. 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Tzotsos A, Argialas D. Support vector machine classification for object-based image analysis. In: Object-based image analysis. Berlin: Springer; 2008, p. 663–677.
   Google Scholar
• Vaiciulis A. Support vector machines in analysis of top quark production. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A. 2003;502(2–3):492–494. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)00479-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Zhou W, Yan J, et al. Comparing machine learning classifiers for object- based land cover classification using very high resolution imagery. Remote Sens (Basel). 2015;7(1):153–168. doi: 10.3390/rs70100153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanh Noi P, Kappas M. Comparison of random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification using sentinel-2 imagery. Sensors. 2018;18(1):18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro A, Torres-Sanchez J, Pena J, et al. An automatic random forest algorithm for early weed mapping between and within crop rows using UAV imagery. Remote Sens (Basel). 2018;10(2):285. doi: 10.3390/rs10020285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar