A robust and forensic transform for copy move digital image forgery detection based on dense depth block matching

References

• Mahdian B, Saic S. Detection of copy–move forgery using a method based on blur moment invariants. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;171(2):180–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Lu W, Sun W, et al. Improved DCT-based detection of copy-move forgery in images. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;206(1):178–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdian B, Saic S. A bibliography on blind methods for identifying image forgery. Signal Process Image Commun. 2010;25(6):389–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad G, Hussain M, Bebis G. Passive copy move image forgery detection using undecimated dyadic wavelet transform. Digital Invest. 2012;9(1):49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christlein V, Riess C, Jordan J, et al. An evaluation of popular copy-move forgery detection approaches. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2012;7(6):1841–1854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Guo J. Passive forensics for copy-move image forgery using a method based on DCT and SVD. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;233(1):158–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdian B, Saic S. Using noise inconsistencies for blind image forensics. Image Vision Comput. 2009;27(10):1497–1503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Qershi OM, Khoo BE. Passive detection of copy-move forgery in digital images: state-of-the-art. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;231:1284–1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birajdar GK, Mankar VH. Digital image forgery detection using passive techniques: a survey. Digital Invest. 2013;10(3):226–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch G, Shih FY, Liao H-YM. An efficient expanding block algorithm for image copy-move forgery detection. Inf Sci. 2013;239:253–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Z, Lu W, Sun W, et al. Digital image splicing detection based on Markov features in DCT and DWT domain. Pattern Recognit. 2012;45(12):4292–4299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Li S, Zhu H, et al. Detecting copy-move forgery under affine transforms for image forensics. Comput Electr Eng. 2014;40(6):1951–1962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang I-C, Yu JC, Chang C-C. A forgery detection algorithm for exemplar-based in painting images using multi-region relation. Image Vision Comput. 2013;31(1):57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J-C, Chang C-P, Chen W-K. Detection of copy–move image forgery using histogram of orientated gradients. Inf Sci. Elsevier. 2015;321:250–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo-Solorio S, Nandi AK. Automated detection and localisation of duplicated regions affected by reflection, rotation and scaling in image forensics. Signal process. 2011;91(8):1759–1770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu S-J, Kirchner M, Lee M-J, et al. Rotation invariant localization of duplicated image regions based on Zernike moments. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2013;8(8):1355–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu C, Likai Lu W, Ni J, et al. Region duplication detection based on Harris corner points and step sector statistics. J Visual Commun Image Represent. 2013;24(3):244–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y. Image copy-move forgery detection based on polar cosine transform and approximate nearest neighbour searching. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;224(1):59–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Deng Y, Duan H, et al. Dual tree complex wavelet transform approach to copy-rotate-move forgery detection. Sci China Inf Sci. 2014;57(1):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahalakshmi SD, Vijayalakshmi K, Priyadharsini S. Digital image forgery detection and estimation by exploring basic image manipulations. Digital Invest. 2012;8(3):215–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong J, Gan Y. Detection of copy–move forgery using discrete analytical Fourier–Mellin transform. Nonlinear Dyn. 2016;84(1):189–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Alfy E-SM, Qureshi MA. Combining spatial and DCT based Markov features for enhanced blind detection of image splicing. Pattern AnalAppl. 2015;18(3):713–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X-Y, Liu Y-N, Xu H, et al. Robust copy–move forgery detection using quaternion exponent moments. Pattern Anal Appl. 2018;21(2):451–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu W-C, Dai J-S, Jian J-S. Effective composite image detection method based on feature inconsistency of image components. Digital Signal Process. 2015;39:50–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J-C. Copy-move image forgery detection based on Gabor magnitude. J Visual Commun Image Represent. 2015;31:320–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi X, Pun CM, Yuan XC. Multi-scale feature extraction and adaptive matching for copy-move forgery detection. Multimed Tools Appl. 2018;77(1):363–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C, Lu W, Huang X, et al. Copy-move forgery detection using combined features and transitive matching. Multimed Tools Appl. 2018: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bao SY, Chandraker M, Lin Y, et al. Dense object reconstruction with semantic priors. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2013. p. 1264–1271.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Kang X, Liu Y, et al. Median filtering forensics based on convolutional neural networks. IEEE Signal Process Lett. 2015;22(11):1849–1853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang XY, Liu YN, Xu H, et al. Robust copy–move forgery detection using quaternion exponent moments. Pattern Anal Appl. 2018;21(2):451–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Han Q, Niu X. Feature point-based copy-move forgery detection: covering the non-textured areas. Multimed Tools Appl. 2016;75(2):1159–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar