Breast cancer detection in digital mammography using a novel hybrid approach of Salp Swarm and Cuckoo Search algorithm with deep belief network classifier

References

• Salod Z, Singh Y. A five-year (2015 to 2019) analysis of studies focused on breast cancer prediction using machine learning: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. J Public Health Res. 2020;9(1):1792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt KL, Cuzick J, Phillips KA. Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20:417–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibden A, Offman J, Duffy SW, et al. Worldwide review and meta-analysis of cohort studies measuring the effect of mammography screening programmes on incidence-based breast cancer mortality. Cancers. 2020;12(4):976,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MM, Haque MR, Iqbal H, et al. Breast cancer prediction: a comparative study using machine learning techniques. SN Comput. Sci. 2020;1:290.
   Google Scholar
• Raj RJS, Shobana SJ, Pustokhina IV, et al. Optimal feature selection-based medical image classification using deep learning model in internet of medical things. IEEE Access. 2020;8:58006–58017.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Kaur P. A comprehensive analysis of nature-inspired meta-heuristic techniques for feature selection problem. Arch Computat Methods Eng. 2021;28:1103–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemeida AM, Alkhalaf S, Mady A, et al. Implementation of nature-inspired optimization algorithms in some data mining tasks. Ain Shams Eng J. 2020;11(2):309–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzanetos A, Dounias G. A comprehensive survey on the applications of swarm intelligence and bio-inspired evolutionary strategies. In: Tsihrintzis G, Jain L, editor. Vol. 18, Machine learning paradigms. Learning and analytics in intelligent systems. Cham: Springer; 2020; 337–378.
   Google Scholar
• Sha Z, Hu L, Rouyendegh BD. Deep learning and optimization algorithms for automatic breast cancer detection. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 2020 Jun;30(2):495–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton GE, Osindero S, Teh Y-W. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput. 2006;18(7):1527–1554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hans R, Kaur H. Hybrid biogeography-based optimization and genetic algorithm for feature selection in mammographic breast density classification. Int J Image Graph. 2022 May 24;22(3):2140007.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan P, Stephan T, Kannan R, et al. A hybrid artificial bee colony with whale optimization algorithm for improved breast cancer diagnosis. Neural Comput Appl. 2021 Oct;33(20):13667–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivhare E, Saxena V. Breast cancer diagnosis from mammographic images using optimized feature selection and neural network architecture. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 2021 Mar;31(1):253–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thawkar S, Sharma S, Khanna M, et al. Breast cancer prediction using a hybrid method based on Butterfly Optimization Algorithm and Ant Lion Optimizer. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021 Dec 1;139:104968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang H, Fan H, Lin S, et al. Automatic breast cancer detection based on optimized neural network using whale optimization algorithm. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 2021 Mar;31(1):425–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muduli D, Dash R, Majhi B. Automated breast cancer detection in digital mammograms: a moth flame optimization based ELM approach. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2020 May 1;59:101912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alweshah M, Khalaileh SA, Gupta BB, et al. The monarch butterfly optimization algorithm for solving feature selection problems. Neural Comput & Applic. 2020;34:11267–11281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thawkar S. A hybrid model using teaching–learning-based optimization and Salp swarm algorithm for feature selection and classification in digital mammography. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. 2021;12:8793–8808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valliappa C, Rajendran R, Balasubramaniam S, et al. Hybrid-based bat optimization with fuzzy C-means algorithm for breast cancer analysis. Int J Non-Commun Dis. 2021;6(Suppl S1):62–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim RA, Abualigah L, Ewees AA, et al. An electric fish-based arithmetic optimization algorithm for feature selection. Entropy. 2021 Sep 9;23(9):1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajendran R, Balasubramaniam S, Ravi V, et al. Hybrid optimization algorithm based feature selection for mammogram images and detecting the breast mass using multilayer perceptron classifier. Comput Intell. 2022 Apr 10;38(4):1559–1593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathiyabhama B, Kumar SU, Jayanthi J, et al. A novel feature selection framework based on grey wolf optimizer for mammogram image analysis. Neural Comput & Applic. 2021;33:14583–14602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebari DA, Zeebaree DQ, Abdulazeez AM, et al. Improved threshold based and trainable fully automated segmentation for breast cancer boundary and pectoral muscle in mammogram images. IEEE Access. 2020;8:203097–203116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah A, Bangash JI, Khan AW, et al. Comparative analysis of median filter and its variants for removal of impulse noise from gray scale images. J King Saud Univ - Comput Inf Sci. 2020 Mar 27;34(3):505–519.
   Google Scholar
• Ravikumar M, Rachana PG, Shivaprasad BJ, et al. Enhancement of mammogram images using CLAHE and bilateral filter approaches. In: Gunjan VK, Suganthan PN, Haase J, et al, editors. Cybernetics, cognition and machine learning applications. Algorithms for intelligent systems. Singapore: Springer; 2021. p. 261–271.
   Google Scholar
• Reza AM. Realization of the contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) for real-time image enhancement. J VLSI Signal Process Syst Signal Image Video Technol. 2004;38:35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Adams R, Bischof L. Seeded region growing. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. June 1994;16(6):641–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty F, Rup S, Dash B, et al. Digital mammogram classification using 2D-BDWT and GLCM features with FOA-based feature selection approach. Neural Comput & Applic. 2020;32:7029–7043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen BH, Xue B, Zhang M. A survey on swarm intelligence approaches to feature selection in data mining. Swarm Evol Comput. 2020 May 1;54:100663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houssein EH, Mohamed IE, Wazery YM. Salp swarm algorithm: a comprehensive review. In: Oliva D, Hinojosa S, editors. 890, Applications of hybrid metaheuristic algorithms for image processing. studies in computational intelligence. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 285–308.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X-S, Deb S. Cuckoo Search via Lévy flights. 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC); 2009, pp. 210-214.
   Google Scholar
• Shen L, He M, Shen N, et al. Optimal breast tumor diagnosis using discrete wavelet transform and deep belief network based on improved sunflower optimization method. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2020 Jul 1;60:101953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suckling J, Parker J, Dance D, et al. (2015). Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) database v1.21 [Dataset]. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/250394.
   Google Scholar
• Bharati S, Podder P, Mondal M. Artificial neural network based breast cancer screening: a comprehensive review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.01767. 2020 May 29.
   Google Scholar
• Basker N, Theetchenya S, Vidyabharathi D, et al. Breast cancer detection using machine learning algorithms. Ann Romanian Soc Cell Biol. 2021 May 5; 25(5): 2551–62.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanraj G, Mohanraj V, Marimuthu M, et al. Epidemic prediction using machine learning and deep learning models on COVID-19 data. J Exp Theor Artif Intell. 2022 Apr 8;35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marimuthu M, Akilandeswari J, Chelliah PR. Identification of trustworthy cloud services: solution approaches and research directions to build an automated cloud broker. Computing. 2022;104(1):43–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sureshkumar V, Balasubramaniam S, Ravi V, et al. A hybrid optimization algorithm-based feature selection for thyroid disease classifier with rough type-2 fuzzy support vector machine. Expert Systems. 2022 Jan;39(1):e12811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-antari MA, Al-masni MA, Park SU, et al. An automatic computer-aided diagnosis system for breast cancer in digital mammograms via deep belief network. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 2018;38:443–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lbachir IA, Daoudi I, Tallal S. Automatic computer-aided diagnosis system for mass detection and classification in mammography. Multimed Tools Appl. 2021;80:9493–9525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Thanoon NA, Algamal ZY, Qasim OS. Feature selection based on a crow search algorithm for big data classification. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 2021 May 15;212:104288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdallh GY, Algamal ZY. A QSAR classification model of skin sensitization potential based on improving binary crow search algorithm. Electron J Appl Stat Anal. 2020 Feb 5;13(1):86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Algamal ZY, Qasim MK, Lee MH, et al. Improving grasshopper optimization algorithm for hyperparameters estimation and feature selection in support vector regression. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 2021 Jan 15;208:104196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algamal ZY, Qasim MK, Lee MH, et al. QSAR model for predicting neuraminidase inhibitors of influenza A viruses (H1N1) based on adaptive grasshopper optimization algorithm. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2020 Nov 1;31(11):803–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathiya T, Sathiyabhama B. Fuzzy relevance vector machine based classification of lung nodules in computed tomography images. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology. 2019 Sep;29(3):360–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar