Fused features for no reference image quality assessment

References

• Chemmanam AJ, Jose BA. Joint learning for multitasking models. In: Responsible data science. Patna: Springer; 2022. p. 155–167.
   Google Scholar
• Zelmati O, Bondžulić B, Pavlović B, et al. Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of infrared compressed images. J Electrical Eng. 2022;73(2):73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Keshri S, Lal S, Shukla K. Picture quality and compression analysis of multilevel legendre wavelet transformation based image compression technique. Multimed Tools Appl. 2022;81:29799–29845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min X, Gu K, Zhai G, et al. Screen content quality assessment: overview, benchmark, and beyond. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR). 2021;54(9):1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawar B, Song J, Ermon S, et al. Jpeg artifact correction using denoising diffusion restoration models. arXiv preprint arXiv:220911888, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Motaung W, Ogudo KA, Chabalala C. Real-time monitoring of video quality in a dash-based digital video broadcasting using deep learning. In: 2022 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems (icABCD). Durban: IEEE; 2022. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikh HR, Bovik AC. An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2005;14(12):2117–2128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2004;13(4):600–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MJ, Bovik AC. Fast structural similarity index algorithm. J. Real-Time Image Process.. 2011;6(4):281–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Simoncelli EP, Bovik AC. Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In: The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, Vol. 2. Pacific Grove (CA): IEEE; 2003. p. 1398–1402.
   Google Scholar
• Xu J, Zhou W, Li H, et al. Quality assessment of multi-exposure image fusion by synthesizing local and global intermediate references. Displays. 2022;74:102–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal A, Moorthy AK, Bovik AC. Blind/referenceless image spatial quality evaluator. In: 2011 Conference Record of the Forty Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR). Pacific Grove (CA): IEEE; 2011. p. 723–727.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal A, Soundararajan R, Bovik AC. Making a ‘completely blind’ image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal Process Lett. 2012;20(3):209–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatanath N, Praneeth D, Bh MC, et al. Blind image quality evaluation using perception based features. In: 2015 Twenty First National Conference on Communications (NCC). Mumbai: IEEE; 2015. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal A, Moorthy AK, Bovik AC. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012;21(12):4695–4708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorthy AK, Bovik AC. Blind image quality assessment: from natural scene statistics to perceptual quality. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2011;20(12):3350–3364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad MA, Bovik AC, Charrier C. Blind image quality assessment: a natural scene statistics approach in the dct domain. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012;21(8):3339–3352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye P, Kumar J, Kang L, et al. Unsupervised feature learning framework for no-reference image quality assessment. In: 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Providence (RI): IEEE; 2012. p. 1098–1105.
   Google Scholar
• Cui Y. No-reference image quality assessment based on dual-domain feature fusion. Entropy. 2020;22(3):344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Li W, Ning X, et al. Blind image quality assessment based on the multiscale and dual-domains features fusion. Concurr Comput Pract Exp. 2021;e6177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Chen J, Zhong H, et al. No-reference image quality assessment based on image multi-scale contour prediction. Appl Sci. 2022;12(6):2833.
   Google Scholar
• Dash PP, Wong A, Mishra A. Venice: a very deep neural network approach to no-reference image assessment. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT). Toronto: IEEE; 2017. p. 1091–1096.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, van de Weijer J, Bagdanov AD. Rankiqa: learning from rankings for no-reference image quality assessment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Venice: IEEE; 2017. p. 1040–1049.
   Google Scholar
• Kang L, Ye P, Li Y, et al. Convolutional neural networks for no-reference image quality assessment'. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Columbus (OH): IEEE; 2014. p. 1733–1740.
   Google Scholar
• Po L, Liu M, Yuen WYF, et al. A novel patch variance biased convolutional neural network for no-reference image quality assessment. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol. 2019;29(4):1223–1229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh HR, Wang Z, Cormack L, et al. Live image quality assessment database release 2, 2005. Available from: http://live ece utexasedu/research/quality.
   Google Scholar
• Ponomarenko N, Lukin V, Zelensky A, et al. Tid2008-a database for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics. Adv Modern Radioelectron. 2009;10(4):30–45.
   Google Scholar
• Ponomarenko N, Jin L, Ieremeiev O, et al. Image database tid2013: peculiarities, results and perspectives. Signal Processing Image Communication. 2015;30:57–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson E, Chandler D. Categorical image quality (csiq) database 2009, 2016. Available from: http://vision okstate edu/csiq.
   Google Scholar
• Talab MA, Awang S, Ansari MD. A novel statistical feature analysis-based global and local method for face recognition. Int J Opt. 2020;2020:4967034.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wu J, Xie X, et al. Blind image quality assessment with improved natural scene statistics model. Digit Signal Process. 2016;57:56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala T, Pietikäinen M, Harwood D. A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions. Pattern Recognit. 1996;29(1):51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1973;6:610–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Po LM, Liu M, Yuen WY, et al. A novel patch variance biased convolutional neural network for no-reference image quality assessment. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol. 2019;29(4):1223–1229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Zhang L, Mou X, et al. Fsim: A feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2011;20(8):2378–2386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Po LM, Feng L, et al. No-reference image quality assessment with deep convolutional neural networks. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP). Beijing: IEEE; 2016. p. 685–689.
   Google Scholar
• Nithin P, Chemmanam AJ, JOSE BA, et al. Interactive robotic testbed for performance assessment of machine learning based computer vision techniques. J Inf Sci Eng. 2020;36(5):1055–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nithin P, Francis A, Chemmanam AJ, et al. Face tracking robot testbed for performance assessment of machine learning techniques. In: 2019 7th International Conference on Smart Computing & Communications (ICSCC). Miri: IEEE; 2019. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar