Optimal blind colour image watermarking based on adaptive chaotic grasshopper optimization algorithm

References

• Dixit A, Dixit R. A review on digital image watermarking techniques. Int. J. Image Graph. Signal Process. 2017;9(4):56–66. doi:10.5815/ijigsp.2017.04.07.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazvini M, Hachrood EM, Mirzadi M. An improved image watermarking method in frequency domain. J. Appl. Secur. Res. 2017;12(2):260–275. doi:10.1080/19361610.2017.1277878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patvardhan C, Kumar P, Vasantha Lakshmi C. Effective color image watermarking scheme using YCbCr color space and QR code. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2018;77(10):12655–12677. doi:10.1007/s11042-017-4909-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Q, Niu Y, Wang G, et al. Color image blind watermarking scheme based on QR decomposition. Signal Process 2014;94(1):219–235. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.06.025.
   Google Scholar
• Su Q, Chen B. Robust color image watermarking technique in the spatial domain. Soft Comput 2018;22(1):91–106. doi:10.1007/s00500-017-2489-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali M, Ahn CW, Pant M. An efficient lossless robust watermarking scheme by integrating redistributed invariant wavelet and fractional Fourier transforms. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2018;77(10):11751–11773. doi:10.1007/s11042-017-4815-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Yu C, Gupta BB, et al. Color image watermarking scheme based on quaternion Hadamard transform and schur decomposition. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2018;77(4):4545–4561. doi:10.1007/s11042-017-4452-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Li Y, Wei X. An improved robust and adaptive watermarking algorithm based on DCT. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 2012;10(3):405–415.
   Google Scholar
• Abbas NH, Ahmad SMS, Parveen S, et al. Design of high performance copyright protection watermarking based on lifting wavelet transform and bi empirical mode decomposition. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2018;77(19):24593–24614. doi:10.1007/s11042-017-5488-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta D, Choubey S. Discrete wavelet transform for image processing. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 2015;4(3):598–602.
   Google Scholar
• Khanam T, Dhar PK, Kowsar S, et al. SVD-based image watermarking using the fast Walsh-Hadamard transform, Key mapping, and coefficient ordering for ownership protection. Symmetry (Basel). Dec. 2019;12(1):52. doi:10.3390/sym12010052.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Wei D. Dual DCT-DWT-SVD digital watermarking algorithm based on particle swarm optimization. Multimed. Tools Appl. Oct. 2019;78(19):28003–28023. doi:10.1007/s11042-019-07902-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devi HS, Singh KM. Red-cyan anaglyph image watermarking using DWT, Hadamard transform and singular value decomposition for copyright protection. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. Feb. 2020;50:102424. doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2019.102424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg P, Kishore RR. An efficient and secured blind image watermarking using ABC optimization in DWT and DCT domain. Multimed. Tools Appl. Nov. 2022;81(26):36947–36964. doi:10.1007/s11042-021-11237-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud K, Datta S, Flint J. Frequency domain watermarking : An overview. Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol. 2005;2(1):33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Thajeel SA, Kadhim LM, Abdlateef SA. A new color image watermarking technique using multiple decompositions. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2017;95(10):2323–2331.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal M, Mehra R. Review of matrix decomposition techniques for signal processing applications. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2014;4(1):90–93.
   Google Scholar
• Kumari Y. Survey on digital image watermarking & techniques. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. Jun. 2017;6(6). doi:10.18535/ijecs/v6i6.25.
   Google Scholar
• Prathap I. Robust and blind watermarking scheme for three dimensional anaglyph images, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Koley S. Bat optimized 3D anaglyph image watermarking based on maximum noise fraction in the digital shearlet domain. Multimed. Tools Appl. Jun. 2022;81(14):19491–19523. doi:10.1007/s11042-021-11861-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savakar DG, Ghuli A. Robust invisible digital image watermarking using hybrid scheme. Arab J Sci Eng 2019;44(4):3995–4008. doi:10.1007/s13369-019-03751-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemdan EED. An efficient and robust watermarking approach based on single value decompression, multi-level DWT, and wavelet fusion with scrambled medical images. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2021;80(2):1749–1777. doi:10.1007/s11042-020-09769-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Q, Niu Y, Zou H, et al. A blind double color image watermarking algorithm based on QR decomposition. Multimed. Tools Appl. Sep. 2014;72(1):987–1009. doi:10.1007/s11042-013-1653-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Yang F, Zhang H. Blind color image watermarking based on DWT and LU decomposition. J. Inf. Process. Syst. Dec. 2016;12(4):765–778. doi:10.3745/JIPS.03.0055.
   Google Scholar
• Prabha K, Sam IS. A novel blind color image watermarking based on Walsh Hadamard transform. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2020;79(9):6845–6869. doi:10.1007/s11042-019-08212-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Q, Wang G, Zhang X, et al. A new algorithm of blind color image watermarking based on LU decomposition. Multidimens Syst Signal Process Jul. 2018;29(3):1055–1074. doi:10.1007/s11045-017-0487-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu F, Cao H, Chen S, et al. A robust and secure blind color image watermarking scheme based on contourlet transform and schur decomposition. Vis. Compu. Jul. 2022. doi:10.1007/s00371-022-02610-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Su Q, Yuan Z, et al. A blind color digital image watermarking method based on image correction and eigenvalue decomposition. Signal Process. Image Commun. Jul. 2021;95:116292. doi:10.1016/j.image.2021.116292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Pal AK. A blind DCT based color watermarking algorithm for embedding multiple watermarks. AEU - Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2017;72:149–161. doi:10.1016/j.aeue.2016.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koley S. Visual attention model based dual watermarking for simultaneous image copyright protection and authentication. Multimed. Tools Appl. Feb. 2021;80(5):6755–6783. doi:10.1007/s11042-020-09918-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koley S. A feature adaptive image watermarking framework based on phase congruency and symmetric Key cryptography. J. King Saud Univ. - Comput. Inf. Sci. Mar. 2022;34(3):636–645. doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg DE, Holland JH. Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Kluwer Acad. Publ. 1988: 95–99.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimisation, in Proceedings of ICNN’95 - International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, WA, Australia, 1995, vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61111-8_2
   Google Scholar
• Dorigo M, Stützle T. The ant colony optimization metaheuristic: algorithms, applications, and advances. In: Glover F, Kochenberger GA, editor. Handbook of metaheuristics, international series in operations research & management science. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2003. p. 250–285.
   Google Scholar
• Saremi S, Mirjalili S, Lewis A. Grasshopper optimisation algorithm: theory and application. Adv.: Eng. Softw. 2017;105:30–47. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirjalili S. The Ant Lion optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 2015;83:80–98. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirjalili S, Lewis A. The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 2016;95:51–67. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirjalili S. Dragonfly algorithm : a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput Appl 2016;27:1053–1073. doi:10.1007/s00521-015-1920-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih FY, Zhong X, Chang I-C, et al. An adjustable-purpose image watermarking technique by particle swarm optimization. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2018;77(2):1623–1642. doi:10.1007/s11042-017-4367-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi AK, Shukla PK. Effective watermarking technique using optimal discrete wavelet transform and sanitization technique. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2020;79(19):13161–13177. doi:10.1007/s11042-020-08639-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavitha TS, Prasad KS. Hybridizing ant lion with whale optimization algorithm for compressed sensing MR image reconstruction via l1 minimization : an ALWOA strategy. Evol Intell 2020. doi:10.1007/s12065-020-00475-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui X, Niu Y, Zheng X, et al. An optimized digital watermarking algorithm in wavelet domain based on differential evolution for color image. PLOS ONE. May 2018;13(5):e0196306. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veni M, Meyyappan T. Digital image watermark embedding and extraction using oppositional fruit Fly algorithm. Multimed. Tools Appl. Oct. 2019;78(19):27491–27510. doi:10.1007/s11042-019-7650-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg P, Kishore RR. Optimized color image watermarking through watermark strength optimization using particle swarm optimization technique. J Inf Optim Sci Aug. 2020;41(6):1499–1512. doi:10.1080/02522667.2020.1802124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Sharma H, Sharma JB. Artificial bee colony based perceptually tuned blind color image watermarking in hybrid LWT-DCT domain. Multimed. Tools Appl. May 2021;80(12):18753–18785. doi:10.1007/s11042-021-10610-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweldens W. Lifting scheme : a new philosophy in biorthogonal wavelet constructions, in Proc. SPIE’s 1995, Wavelet Applications in Signal and Image Processing III, 1995, vol. 2569, pp. 68–79.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Zhao Y, Song Y. 2D logistic-modulated-sine-coupling-logistic chaotic map for image encryption. IEEE Access. 2019;7:14081–14098. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2893538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora S, Anand P. Chaotic grasshopper optimization algorithm for global optimization. Neural Comput Appl 2019;31(8):4385–4405. doi:10.1007/s00521-018-3343-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue X, Zhang H. Grasshopper optimization algorithm with principal component analysis for global optimization. J Supercomput 2020;76(7):5609–5635. doi:10.1007/s11227-019-03098-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CVG - UGR - Image database. [cited 2021 Aug. 31] Available from: https://ccia.ugr.es/cvg/dbimagenes/c512.php.
   Google Scholar
• SIPI Image Database - Misc. [cited 2021 Aug. 31] Available from: http://sipi.usc.edu/database/database.php?volume = misc.
   Google Scholar