Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: a review

References

• AINODA, N. and OKAZAKI, K., 1993, Results of systematic speech sound monitoring in children with cleft palate. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopedica, 48, 286—291.
   Google Scholar
• AMERICAN CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, Parameters for Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate or Other Craniofacial Anomalies (Chapel Hill, NC: ACPCA).
   Google Scholar
• AMOROSA, H., VON BENDA, U., WAGNER, E. and KECK,A. , 1985, Transcribing phonetic detail in the speech of unintelligible children: a comparison of procedures. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 20, 281–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BAGNALL, A. D. and DAVID, D. J., 1988, Speech results of cleft palate surgery: two methods of assessment. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 41, 488–495.
   Google Scholar
• COUNIHAN, D. T. and CULLINAN, W L., 1970, Reliability and dispersion of nasality ratings. Cleft Palate Journal, 7, 261–270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CLINICAL STANDARDS ADVISORY GROUP, 1998, CSAG Report (London: HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• D'ANTONIO, L. L. and SCHERER, N. J., 1995, The evaluation of speech disorders associated with clefting. In R. J. Shprintzen and J. Bardach (eds), Cleft Palate Speech Management (St Louis: Mosby), pp. 176–220.
   Google Scholar
• DALSTON, R. M., MARSH, J. L., VIG, K. W., WITZEL, M. A. and BUMSTEAD, M. A., 1988, Minimal standards for reporting the results of surgery on patients with cleft lip, cleft palate or both: a proposal. Cleft Palate Journal., 25, 3–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DALSTON, R. M. and WARREN, D. W., 1986, Comparison of Tonar 11, pressure-flow, and listener judgements of hypernasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function. Cleft Palate Journal., 23, 108–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, 2000, National Health Service Plan: Creating a 21st Century Health Service (London: UK).
   Google Scholar
• ENDERBY, P., JOHN, A., PETHERAM, B. and HUGHES, A., 2000, Therapy outcome measures benchmarking project report (unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• EUROCLEFT SPEECH GROUP: GRUNWELL, P., BRONSTED, K., HENNINGSSON, G., JANSONIUS, K., KARLING, J., MEIJER M., ORDING, D., WYATT, R., SELL, D. and VERMEIJ-ZIEVERINK, E., 1994, A phonetic framework for the cross-linguistic analysis of cleft palate speech. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 8, 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• EUROCLEFT SPEECH GROUP: GRUNWELL, P., BRONSTED, K., HENNINGSSON, G., JANSONIUS, K., KARLING, J., MEIJER, M., ORDING, U., WYATT, R., SELL, D. and VERMEIJ-ZIEVERINK, E., 2000, A six-centre international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic Reconstructive Hand Surgery, 34, 31–11.
   Google Scholar
• GERRATT, B. R., KREIMAN, J., ANTONANZAS-BARROSO, N. and BERKE, G. S., 1991, Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• GIBBON, F. E. and CRAMPIN, L., 2001, An electropalatographic investigation of middorsum palatal stops in an adult with repaired cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 38, 96–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOOCH, J. L., HARDIN-JONES, M., CHAPMAN, K. L., TROST-CARDAMONE, J. E. and SUSSMAN, J., 2001, Reliability of listener transcriptions of compensatory articulations. Cleft Palate Journal, 38, 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• GRUNWELL, P., SELL, D. and HARDING, A., 1993, Describing cleft palate speech. In P. Grunwell (ed.), Analysing Cleft Palate Speech (London: Whurr), pp. 6–18.
   Google Scholar
• HAAPANEN, M. L., 1991, A simple clinical method of evaluating perceived hypernasality. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopedica, 43, 122–132.
   Google Scholar
• HARDING, A., HARLAND, K. and RAZZELL, R., 1997, Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech (CAPS) (available from Speech/Language Therapy Department, St Andrew's Plastic Surgery Centre, Broomfield, Chelmsford, Essex).
   Google Scholar
• HAYDEN, C. and KLIMACKA, L., 2000, Inter-rater reliability in cleft palate speech assessment. Journal of Clinical Excellence, 2, 169–173.
   Google Scholar
• HENNINGSSON, G. and HUTTERS, B., 1997, Perceptual Assessment of cleft palate speech, with special reference to minimum standards for inter-centre comparisons of speech outcome. Paper presented at the 8th International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• HESS, D. A., 1976, Quanti—scaling of articulation defectiveness in cleft palate speakers. Cleft Palate Journal, 10, 253–260.
   Google Scholar
• HIRSCHBERG, J. and VAN DEMARK, D. R., 1997, A proposal for standardization of speech and hearing evaluations to assess velopharyngeal function. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopedica, 49, 158–167.
   Google Scholar
• HOWARD, S. J. and HESELWOOD, B. C., 2002, Learning and teaching phonetic transcription for clinical purposes. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 16, 371–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUTTERS, B. and HENNINGSSON, G., 2001, CLOC—a system for perceptual assessment of cleft palate speech with special reference to cross-linguistic speech outcome comparisons. Paper presented at the 9th International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• HUTTERS, B. and HENNINGSSON, G., 2004, Speech outcome following treatment in cross-linguistic studies—methodological implications. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal, 41, 544–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JOHN, A., SELL, D., HARDING-BELL, A., SWEENEY, T. and WILLIAMS, A., 2003, The development of a valid and reliable tool for auditing speech outcome in cleft care. Paper presented at the Craniofacial Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Leeds, UK (submitted).
   Google Scholar
• KARLING, J., LARSON, O., LEANDERSON, R. and HENNINGSSON, G., 1993, Speech in unilateral and bilateral cleft palate patients from Stockholm. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal, 30, 73–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KENT, R. D., WEISMER, G., KENT, J. F., VORPERIAN, H. K. and DUFFY, J. R., 1999, Acoustic studies of dysarthric speech: methods, progress, and potential. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32, 141–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KEUNING, K., WIENEKE, G. H. and DEJONCKERE, P. H., 1999, The intrajudge reliability of the perceptual rating of cleft palate speech before and after pharyngeal flap surgery: the effect of judges and speech samples. Cleft Palate Journal, 36, 328–333.
   Google Scholar
• KREIMAN, J., GERRATT, B. R., KEMPSTER, G. B., ERMNAN, A. and BERKE, G. S., 1993, Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 21–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KUEHN, D. and MOLLER, K. T., 2000, Speech and language issues in the cleft palate population: the state of the art. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal, 37, 348–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KUEHN, D. P., SELL, D. and TROST-CARDAMONE, J. E., 2002, Issues in universal reporting parameters for speech. Paper presented at the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, Seattle, WA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• LOHMANDER-AGERSKOV, A., DOTEVAL, H., LITH, A. and SODERPALM, E., 1996, Speech and velopharyngeal functioning in children with an open residual cleft in the hard palate and the influence of temporary covering. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal, 33, 324–332.
   Google Scholar
• LOHMANDER-AGERSKOV, A. and OLSSON, M., 2004, Methodology for perceptual assessment of speech in patients with cleft palate: a critical review of the literature. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal, 41, 64–70.
   Google Scholar
• MCCOMB, H., 1989, Cleft lip and palate new directions for research. Cleft Palate Journal, 26, 145–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MCGURK, H. and MACDONALD, J., 1976, Hearing lip and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746—748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCWILLIAMS, B. J., MORRIS, H. L. and SHELTON, R. L., 1984, Cleft Palate Speech (Philadelphia: B. C. Decker).
   Google Scholar
• MCWILLIAMS, B. J., MORRIS, H. L. and SHELTON, R. L., 1990, Cleft Palate Speech. 2nd edn (Philadelphia: B. C. Decker).
   Google Scholar
• MCWILLIAMS, B. J. and PHILIPS, B. J., 1979, Velopharyngeal Incompetence Audio Seminars in Speech Pathology (Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders).
   Google Scholar
• MEHENDALE, F. V. and SOMMERLAD, B. C., 2003, Unilateral Moore pharyngoplasty in the treatment of unilateral or asymmetric velopharyngeal incompetence. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal., 40, 263–268.
   Google Scholar
• MOLLER, K. T. and STARR, C. D., 1984, The effects of listening conditions on speech ratings obtained in a clinical setting. Cleft Palate Journal., 21, 65–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE, UK, 2002 www.nice.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• PEREIRA, V., SACHER, P. and RYAN, M., 2002, Dysphagia and nutrition in Apert syndrome: a clinical audit. Paper presented at the 4th Asia Pacific Conference, Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• PETERSON-FALZONE, S. J., 1995, Speech outcomes in adolescents with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate— Craniofacial Journal, 32, 125–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PHILIPS, B. J. and BZOCH, K. R., 1969, Reliability of judgements of articulation of cleft palate speakers. Cleft Palate Journal., 6, 24–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PODOL, J. and SALVIA, J., 1976, Effects of visibility of a prepalatal cleft on the evaluation of speech. Cleft Palate Journal., 13, 361–366.
   Google Scholar
• RAMIG, L. A., 1982, Effects of examiner expectancy on speech ratings of individuals with cleft lip and/ or palate. Cleft Palate Journal., 19, 270–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RISKI, J. E., 1996, Response to Speech outcome following palatoplasty in primary school aged children. Do lay peer observers agree with speech pathologists? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 98, 965–967.
   Google Scholar
• RISKI, J. E., 2001, Minimal standards in speech/language pathology, craniofacial outcomes registry approach, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association Database. Paper presented at the 9th International World Congress on Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• RUSSELL, V. J. and HARDING, A., 2001, Speech development and early intervention. In A. C. H. Watson, D. Sell and P. Grunwell (eds), Management of Cleft Lip and Palate (London: Whurr), pp. 191–209.
   Google Scholar
• SACKETT, D. L., SCOTT RICHARDSON, W., ROSENBERG and HAYNES, R. B., 1998, Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Reach EBM (Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone).
   Google Scholar
• SANDY, J., WILLIAMS, A., BEARN, D., MILDINHALL, S., MURPHY, T., SELL, D., MURRAY, J. and SHAW, W. C., 2001, The Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Study. Part 1: Background and methodology. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal., 38, 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• SANTELMANN, H., SUSSMAN, J. and CHAPMAN, K., 1999, Perception of middorsum palatal stops from the speech of three children with repaired cleft palate. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal., 36, 233–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEAVER, E. J., DALSTON, R. M., LEEPER, H. A. and ADAMS, L. E., 1991, A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 715–721.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SELL, D., 2001, Unravelling speech assessment in cleft palate in 2001. Keynote Speech, 9th International World Congress on Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• SELL, D. and GRUNWELL, P., 1990, Preliminary speech results in a subgroup of unoperated Sri Lankan cleft lip and adolescents following late palatal surgery. Cleft Palate Journal, 27, 162–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SELL, D. and GRUNWELL, P., 2001, Speech assessment and therapy. In A. C. H. Watson, D. Sell and P. Grunwell (eds), Management of Cleft Lip and Palate (London: Whurr), pp. 258–285.
   Google Scholar
• SELL, D., HARDING, A. and GRUNWELL, P., 1999, Revised GOS.SP.ASS (98): Speech assessment for children with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 34, 7–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SELL, D., GRUNWELL, P., MILDINHALL, S., MURPHY, T., CORNISH, T. C., WILLIAMS, A., BEARN, D., SHAW, W C., MURRAY, J. and SANDY, J., 2001, The Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Study. Part 3— Speech outcomes. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal, 38, 30–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SELL, D., MILDINHALL, S., MURPHY, T., CORNISH, T. and GRUNWELL, P., 2002, Speech analysis: audio or video recordings? Paper presented at the Craniofacial Society of Great Britain and Ireland, East Grinstead, UK.
   Google Scholar
• SHRIBERG, L. D. and KWIATKOWSKI, J., 1980, Natural Process Analysis (New York: Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• SHRIBERG, L. D., KWIATKOWSKI, J. and HOFFMANN, K., 1984, A procedure for phonetic transcription by consensus. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 456–465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SHRIBERG, L. D. and LOF, G. L., 1991, Reliability studies in broad and narrow phonetic transcription. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 1, 171–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOMMERLAD, B. C., MEHENDALE, F. V, BIRCH, M. J., SELL, D. A., HATTEE, C. and HARLAND, K., 2002, Palate re-repair revisited. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal., 39, 295–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STARR, C. D., MOLLER, K. T., DAWSON, W., GRAHAM, J. and SKAAR, S., 1984, Speech ratings by speech clinicians, parents and children. Cleft Palate Journal, 21, 286–292.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SUBTELNY, J. D., VANHATTUM, R. J. and MYERS, B. B., 1972, Ratings and measures of cleft palate speech. Cleft Palate Journal., 9, 18–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SWEENEY, L. T., 2001, The perceptual and instrumental assessment of nasality and nasal airflow errors associated with velopharyngeal dysfunction. PhD thesis, Trinity College, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• SWEENEY, T., SELL, D. and O'REGAN, M., 2004, Nasalance scores for normal-speaking Irish children. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal., 41, 168–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SWEENEY, T. and SELL, D., 2004, The relationship between perceptual and instrumental assessments of nasality and nasal airflow errors in children with cleft palate and for velopharyngeal dysfunction. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal., submitted.
   Google Scholar
• TRINIDADE, I. E. K., GENENRO, K. F. and DALSTON, R. M., 1997, Nasalance scores of normal Brazilian Portuguese speakers. Brazilian Journal of Dysmorphology and Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1, 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• TROST, J. E., 1981, Articulatory additions to the classical description of the speech of persons with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Journal, 18, 93–203.
   Google Scholar
• VAN DENMARK, D. R., 1964, Misarticulations and listener judgements of the speech of individuals with cleft palates. Cleft Palate Journal, 1, 232–245.
   Google Scholar
• VAN DER HAM, I., BIRKETT, L. and SELL,D. , 2002, Early speech and language therapy intervention: necessity or luxury? Paper presented at the Craniofacial Society of Great Britain and Ireland, East Grinstead, UK.
   Google Scholar
• VAN DOORN, J. and PURCELL,A. , 1998, Nasalance levels in the speech of normal Australian children. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal., 36, 287–292.
   Google Scholar
• VAN LIERDE, K. M., WUYTS, F. M., DE BODT, M. and VAN CAUWENBERGE, P., 2001, Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal., 38, 112–118.
   Google Scholar
• WHITEHILL, T. L., 2001, Nasalance scores in Cantonese-speaking women. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal., 38, 119–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHITEHILL, T. L., 2002, Assessing intelligibility in speakers with cleft palate: a critical review of the literature. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal., 39, 50–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHITEHILL, T. L., LEE, A. and CHUN, J. C., 2001, Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of hypernasality. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 45, 80–88.
   Google Scholar
• WILLIAMS, A., BEARN, D., MILDINHALL, S., MURPHY, T., SELL, D., SEMB, G., SHAW, W C., MURRAY, J. and SANDY, J., 2001, The Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study. Part 2: Dentofacial outcomes and patient satisfaction. Cleft Palate—Craniofacial Journal., 38, 24–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WITT, P. D., BERRY, L., MARSH, J. L., GRAMES, L. M. and PILGRAM, T. K., 1996, Speech outcome following palatoplasty in primary school aged children. Do lay peer observers agree with speech pathologists? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 98, 958–965.
   Google Scholar
• WITT, P. D., MILLER, D. C., MARSH, J. L., MUNTZ, H., GRAMES, L. M. and PILGRAM, T. K., 1997, Perception of postpalatoplasty speech differences in school-age children by parents, teachers and professional speech pathologists. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 100, 1655–1663.
   Google Scholar
• WITZEL, M. A., 1991, Speech evaluation and treatment. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, 3, 501–516.
   Google Scholar
• WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION, 1980, International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) (Geneva: WHO).
   Google Scholar
• WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION, 2001, International Classification of Function and Disability (Geneva: WHO).
   Google Scholar
• WYATT, R., SELL, D., RUSSELL, J., HARDING, A., HARLAND, K. and ALBERY, E., 1996, Cleft palate speech dissected: a review of current knowledge and analysis. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 49, 143–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• YOUNG, M. A., 1969, Observer agreement: cumulative effects of repeated ratings of speech sample and knowledge of group results. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 144–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar