The need for self‐report data in the assessment of stuttering therapy efficacy: repetitions and prolongations of speech. The stuttering syndrome

References

• Alfonso P. J. Definition and subject‐selection criteria for stuttering research in adult subjects. Research Needs in Stuttering: Roadblocks and Future Directions, J. A Cooper. American Speech–Language–Hearing Association, Rockville, MD 1990; 15–24
   Google Scholar
• Andrews G., Cutler J. Stuttering therapy: the relation between changes in symptom level and attitudes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1974; 9: 39–49
   Google Scholar
• Armson J., Kalinowski J. Interpreting results of the fluent speech paradigm in stuttering research: difficulties in separating cause from effect. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1994; 37: 69–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloodstein O. Stuttering as an anticipatory struggle reaction. Stuttering: A Symposium, J Eisenson. Harper, New York 1959; 1–69
   Google Scholar
• Bloodstein O. A Handbook on Stuttering 5. Singular, San Diego, CA 1995
   Google Scholar
• Boberg E. Maintenance of Fluency. Elsevier North Holland, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Boberg E., Kully D. Long‐term results of an intensive treatment program for adults and adolescents who stutter. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1994; 37: 1050–1059
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boberg E., Sawyers L. The maintenance of fluency following intensive therapy. Human Communication 1977; 2: 21–28
   Google Scholar
• Braun A. R., Varga M., Stager S., Schulz G., Selbie S., Maisog J. M., Carson R. E., Ludlow C. L. Altered patterns of cerebral activity during speech and language production in developmental stuttering. An H2(15)O positron emission tomography study. Brain 1997; 120: 761–784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran J. A., Stewart M. Stories of stuttering: a qualitative analysis of interview narratives. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1998; 23: 247–264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordes A. K., Ingham R. J. Judgments of stuttered and nonstuttered intervals by recognized authorities in stuttering research. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1995; 38: 33–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Craig A. Relapse following treatment for stuttering: a critical review and correlative data. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1998; 23: 1–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig A. R., Calver P. Following up on treated stutterers: studies of perceptions of fluency and job status. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 279–284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Craig A. R., Hancock K. Self‐reported factors related to relapse following treatment for stuttering. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders 1995; 23: 48–60
   Google Scholar
• Dayalu V. N., Kalinowski J. Stuttering therapy results in pseudofluency. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2001; 36: 405–408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayalu V. N., Kalinowski J. Pseudofluency in adults who stutter: the illusory outcome of therapy. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2002; 94: 87–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Nil L. F., Kroll R. M., Kapur S., Houle S. A positron emission tomography study of silent and oral single word reading in stuttering and nonstuttering adults. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2000; 43: 1038–1053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson R. L. Assessing communication attitudes among stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1969; 12: 711–724
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finn P. Evidence‐based treatment of stuttering: II. Clinical significance of behavioral stuttering treatments. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2003; 28: 209–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox P. T., Ingham R. J., Ingham J. C., Hirsch T. B., Downs J. H., Martin C., Jerabek P., Glass T., Lancaster J. L. A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering. Nature 1996; 382: 158–161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franken M. C., Boves L., Peters H. F. M., Webster R. Perceptual evaluation of the speech before and after fluency shaping therapy. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1992; 17: 223–242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman F. J. Laryngeal muscle activity of stutterers. Nature and Treatment of Stuttering: New Directions, R. F Curlee, W. H Perkins. College Hill Press, San Diego, CA 1984; 104–116
   Google Scholar
• Freeman F. J., Ushijima T. Laryngeal muscle activity during stuttering. Journal of speech and Hearing Research 1978; 21: 538–562
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ham R. E. What are we measuring?. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1989; 14: 231–243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayhow R., Cray A. M., Enderby P. Stammering and therapy views of people who stammer. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2002; 27: 1–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell P., Wingfield T. Perceptual and acoustic evidence for reduced fluency in the vicinity of stuttering episodes. Language and Speech 1990; 33: 31–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingham R. J., Cordes A. Self‐measurement and evaluating stuttering treatment efficacy. Nature and Treatment of Stuttering: New Directions, R Curlee, G Siegal. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA 1997; 413–437
   Google Scholar
• Ingham R. J., Cordes A. K., Finn P. Time‐interval measurement of stuttering: systematic replication of Ingham, Cordes, and Gow (1993). Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1993b; 36: 1168–1176
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ingham R. J., Cordes A. K., Gow M. L. Time‐interval measurement of stuttering: modifying interjudge agreement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1993a; 36: 503–515
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ingham R. J., Fox P. T., Ingham J. C., Zamarripa F. Is overt stuttered speech a prerequisite for the neural activations associated with chronic developmental stuttering?. Brain and Language 2000; 75: 163–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingham R. J., Gow M., Costello J. M. Stuttering and speech naturalness: some additional data. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1985; 50: 217–219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson W. People in Quandaries. Harper, New York 1946
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski A. G., Kalinowski J., Stuart A., Rastatter M. P. A latent trait approach to the development of persistent stuttering. Perception and Motor Skills 1998; 87: 1331–1358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski J., Dayalu V. N. A common element in the immediate inducement of effortless, natural‐sounding, fluent speech in people who stutter: ‘the second speech signal’. Medical Hypotheses 2002; 58: 61–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski J., Dayalu V. N., Stuart A., Rastatter M. P., Rami M. K. Stutter‐free and stutter‐filled speech signals and their role in stuttering amelioration for English speaking adults. Neuroscience Letters 2000; 29: 115–118
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski J., Guntupalli V. K., Stuart A., Saltuklaroglu T. Self‐reported efficacy of an ear‐level prosthetic device that delivers altered auditory feedback for the management of stuttering. International Journal of Rehabilitation and Research 2004a; 27: 167–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski J., Noble S., Armson J., Stuart A. Naturalness ratings of the pretreatment and posttreatment speech of adults with mild and severe stuttering. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 1994; 3: 65–70
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski J., Saltuklaroglu T. Choral speech: the amelioration of stuttering via imitation and the mirror neuronal system. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2003; 27: 339–347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski J., Saltuklaroglu T., Guntupalli V. K., Stuart A. Gestural recovery and the role of forward and reversed syllabic repetitions as stuttering inhibitors in adults. Neuroscience Letters 2004b; 363: 144–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kully D., Boberg E. An investigation of interclinic agreement in the identification of fluent and stuttered syllables. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1988; 13: 309–318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman A. M., Mattingly I. G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 1985; 21: 1–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClean M., Kroll R., Loftus N. Kinematic analysis of lip closure in stutterers' fluent speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1990; 33: 755–760
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neumann K., Euler H. A., Von Gudenberg A. W., Giraud A. L., Lanfermann H., Gall V., Preibisch C. J. The nature and treatment of stuttering as revealed by fMRI A within‐ and between‐group comparison. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2003; 28: 381–410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brian S., Onslow M., Cream A., Packman A. The Camperdown program: outcomes of a new prolonged‐speech treatment model. Journal of Speech, language, and Hearing Research 2003; 46: 933–946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brian S., Packman A., Onslow M. Self‐rating of stuttering severity as a clinical tool. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 2004; 13: 219–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins W. H. Speech pathology: An Applied Science. Mosby, St Louis, MO 1971
   Google Scholar
• Perkins W. H. From psychoanalysis to discoordination. Controversies About Stuttering Therapy, H. H Gregory. University Park Press, Baltimore, MD 1979; 97–128
   Google Scholar
• Perkins W. H. Learning from negative outcomes in stuttering therapy: II. An epiphany of failures. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1983; 8: 155–160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preibisch C., Neumann K., Raab P., Euler H. A., Von Gudenberg A. W., Lanfermann H., Giraud A. L. Evidence for compensation for stuttering by the right frontal operculum. Neuroimage 2003; 20: 1356–1364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins D., Beaudet R. Defense preference and stutterers' speech disfluencies: implications for the nature of the disorder. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1980; 23: 757–768
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riley J., Riley G., Maguire G. J. Subjective screening of stuttering severity, locus of control and avoidance: research edition. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2004; 29: 51–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti G., Arbib M. A. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience 1998; 21: 188–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runyan C. M., Adams M. R. Perceptual study of the speech of ‘successfully therapeutized’ stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1978; 3: 25–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runyan C. M., Adams M. R. Unsophisticated judges' perceptual evaluations of the speech of ‘successfully treated’ stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1979; 4: 29–48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runyan C. M., Bell J. N., Prosek R. A. Speech naturalness ratings of treated stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1990; 55: 434–438
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saltuklaroglu T., Kalinowski J. The end‐product of behavioural stuttering therapy: three decades of denaturing the disorder. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 786–789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltuklaroglu T., Kalinowski J., Guntupalli V. K. Towards a common neural substrate in the immediate and effective inhibition of stuttering. International Journal of Neuroscience 2004; 114: 435–450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan J. G. Conflict theory of stuttering. Stuttering: A Symposium, J Eisenson. Harper, New York 1958
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan J. G. Stuttering: Research and Therapy. Harper & Row, New York 1970
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan J. G. Problems in the evaluation of progress and outcome. Current Therapy of Communication Disorders: Stuttering Disorders, W. H Perkins. Thieme‐Stratton, New York 1984; 223–239
   Google Scholar
• Silverman F. H. How ‘typical’ is a stutterer's stuttering in a clinical environment?. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1975; 40: 458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkweather C. W. Fluency and Stuttering. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1987
   Google Scholar
• Stewart T., Richardson A. A qualitative study of therapeutic effect from a user's perspective. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2004; 29: 95–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Story R. S. A pre‐ and post‐therapy comparison of articulatory, laryngeal, and respiratory kinematics of stutterers' fluent speech. 1990, PhD thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs
   Google Scholar
• Story R. S., Alfonso P. J., Harris K. S. Pre‐ and posttreatment comparison of the kinematics of the fluent speech of persons who stutter. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1996; 39: 991–1005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Riper C. Speech Correction: Principles and Methods. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1963
   Google Scholar
• Van Riper C. The Nature of Stuttering 2. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1982
   Google Scholar
• Watson B. C., Alfonso P. J. Physiological bases of acoustic LRT in nonstutterers, mild stutterers, and severe stutterers. Journal of speech and Hearing Research 1987; 30: 434–447
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster R. L. Empirical considerations regarding stuttering therapy. Controversies About Stuttering Therapy, H. H Gregory. University Park Press, Baltimore, MD 1979; 209–240
   Google Scholar
• Webster R. L. Evolution of a target‐based behavioural therapy for stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1980; 5: 303–320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf G. The assessment of stuttering as struggle, avoidance, and expectancy. British Journal of Disorders in Communication 1967; 2: 158–171
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu J. C., Maguire G., Riley G., Fallon J., Lacasse L., Chin S., Klein E., Tang C., Cadwell S., Lottenberg S. A positron emission tomography [18F]deoxyglucose study of developmental stuttering. Neuroreport 1995; 15: 501–505
   Google Scholar
• Yaruss J. S., Quesal R. W., Reeves L., Molt L. F., Kluetz B., Caruso A. J., McClure J. A., Lewis F. Speech treatment and support group experiences of people who participate in the National Stuttering Association. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2002; 27: 115–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar