225
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Report

Real‐time language processing in school‐age children with specific language impairment

Pages 275-291 | Received 22 Mar 2005, Accepted 14 Jun 2005, Published online: 03 Jul 2009

References

  • American National Standards Institute. Specifications of Audiometers. ANSI, New York 1989, ANSI S3.6‐1989
  • ASYST. ASYST. Keithley Instruments, Inc., Cleveland, OH 1993, Software
  • Bishop D. V. Test for Reception of Grammar 2. Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester 1989
  • Brown L., Sherbenou R., Johnsen S. Test of Nonverbal Intelligence 2. Pro‐Ed, Austin, TX 1990
  • Dunn M., Dunn M. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test — Revised. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN 1981
  • Ellis Weismer S., Hesketh L. Lexical learning by children with specific language impairment: effects of linguistic input presented at varying speaking rates. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1996; 54: 177–190
  • Frauenfelder U., Tyler L. The process of spoken word recognition: an Introduction. Cognition 1987; 25: 1–20
  • Gaskell M., Marslen‐Wilson W. Integrating form and meaning: a distributed model of speech perception. Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives on the Lexicon, G. T. M Altman. Psychology Press, Hove 1997
  • Goldman R., Fristoe M. Goldman–Fristoe Test of Articulation. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN 1986
  • Hughes M., Sussman H. An assessment of cerebral dominance in language‐disordered children via a time‐sharing paradigm. Brain and Language 1983; 19: 48–64
  • Kail R. Processing time declines exponentially during adolescence. Developmental Psychology 1991; 27: 259–266
  • Lahiri A., Marslen‐Wilson W. The mental representation of lexical form: a phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition 1990; 38: 245–294
  • Marslen‐Wilson W., Tyler L. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 1980; 25: 71–102
  • Marslen‐Wilson W., Welsh A. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 1978; 10: 29–63
  • Marslen‐Wilson W., Zwiterslood P. Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989; 15: 576–585
  • McQueen J., Cutler A., Briscoe T., Norris D. Models of continuous speech recognition and the contents of the vocabulary. Language and Cognitive Processes 1995; 10: 309–331
  • Merzenich M., Jenkins W., Johnston P., Schreiner C., Miller S., Tallal P. Temporal processing deficits of language‐learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science 1996; 271: 77–84
  • Miller C., Kail R., Leonard L., Tomblin J. B. Speed of processing in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2001; 44: 416–433
  • Miller J. Assessing Language Production in Children. University Park Press, Baltimore, MD 1981
  • Moe A., Hopkins C., Rush R. The Vocabulary of First‐grade Children. Thomas, Springfield, IL 1982
  • Montgomery J. Recognition of gated words by children with specific language impairment: an examination of lexical mapping. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1999; 42: 735–743
  • Montgomery J. Relation of working memory to off‐line and real‐time sentence processing in children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics 2000; 21: 117–148
  • Montgomery J. Examining the nature of lexical processing in children with specific language impairment: temporal processing or processing capacity deficit?. Applied Psycholinguistics 2002a; 23: 447–470
  • Montgomery J. Information processing and language comprehension in children with specific language impairments. Topics in Language Disorders: Information processing: Implications for Assessment and Intervention 2002b; 22: 64–87
  • Montgomery J. Effects of input rate and age on the real‐time lexical processing of children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. 2005; 40: 171–188
  • Montgomery J., Leonard L. Real‐time inflectional processing by children with specific language impairment: effects of phonetic substance. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1998; 41: 1442–1443
  • Montgomery J., Scudder R., Moore C. Language‐impaired children's real‐time comprehension of spoken language. Applied Psycholinguistics 1990; 11: 273–290
  • Nichols S., Townsend J., Wulfeck B. Covert Visual Attention in Language‐impaired Children. Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego, CA 1995, Technical Report CND‐9502
  • Pisoni D., Luce P. Acoustic–phonetic representations in word recognition. Cognition 1987; 25: 21–52
  • Pitt M., Samuel A. Lexical and sublexical feedback in auditory word recognition. Cognitive Psychology 1995; 29: 149–188
  • Robbins J., Klee T. Clinical assessment of oropharyngeal motor development in young children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1987; 52: 271–277
  • Semel E., Wiig E., Secord W. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals — Revised 1987, San Antonio, TX. Psychological Corporation
  • Stark R., Montgomery J. Sentence processing in language‐impaired children under conditions of filtering and time compression. Applied Psycholinguistics 1995; 16: 137–154
  • Tallal P., Stark R., Mellits D. The relationship between auditory temporal analysis and receptive language development: evidence from studies of developmental language disorder. Neuropsychologia 1985a; 23: 527–534
  • Tallal P., Stark R., Mellits D. Identification of language‐impaired children on the basis of rapid perception and production skills. Brain and Language 1985b; 25: 314–322
  • Tyler A. Spoken Language Comprehension: An Experimental Approach to Disordered and Normal Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1992
  • Warren P., Marslen‐Wilson W. Cues to lexical choice: discriminating place and voice. Perception and Psychophysics 1988; 43: 21–30
  • Windsor J., Hwang M. Children's auditory lexical decisions: a limited processing capacity account of language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 1999; 42: 990–1002
  • Wingfield A., Goodglass H., Lindfield K. Word recognition from acoustic onsets and acoustic offsets: effects of cohort size and syllabic stress. Applied Psycholinguistics 1997; 18: 85–100

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.