Introduction to qualitative research and its application to stuttering

References

• Acton C. A conversation analytic perspective on stammering: some reflections and observations. Stammering Research 2004; 1: 249–270, [on‐line journal published by British Stammering Association (available at: www.stammering.org/research.html)]
   Google Scholar
• Anderson T., Felsenfeld S. A thematic analysis of late recovery from stuttering. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 2003; 12: 243–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews G., Cutler J. Stuttering therapy: the relationship between changes in symptom level and attitudes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1974; 39: 312–319
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bajaj A., Hodson B., Westby C. Communication ability conceptions among children who stutter and their fluent peers: a qualitative exploration. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2005; 30: 41–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bothe A. K., Andreatta R. D. Quantitative and qualitative research paradigms: thoughts on the quantity and the creativity of stuttering research. Advances in Speech–Language Pathology 2004; 6: 167–173
   Google Scholar
• Brutten G., Dunham S. The Communication Attitude Test: a normative study of grade school children. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1989; 14: 371–377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman A. Quantity and Quality in Social Research. Routledge, London 1988
   Google Scholar
• Cheek J., Onslow M., Cream A. Beyond the divide: Comparing and contrasting aspects of qualitative and quantitative research approaches. Advances in Speech–Language Pathology 2004; 6: 147–152
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran J., Stewart M. Therapeutic experiences of people who stutter. Journal of Speech–Language Pathology and Audiology 1975; 19: 89–96
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran J. A., Stewart M. A. Therapeutic experiences of people who stutter. Journal of Speech–Language Pathology and Audiology 1995; 19: 89–96
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran J., Stewart M. Stories of stuttering: a qualitative analysis of interview narratives. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1998; 23: 247–264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig A., Andrews G. The prediction and prevention of relapse in stuttering. Behaviour Modification 1985; 9: 427–442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell J. W. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Crichton‐Smith I. Communicating in the real world: accounts from people who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2002; 27: 333–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiLollo A., Manning W., Neimeyer R. A. Cognitive anxiety as a function of speaker role for fluent speakers and persons who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2003; 28: 167–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiLollo A., Neimeyer R. A., Manning W. A personal construct psychology view of relapse: Indications for a narrative therapy component to stuttering treatment. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2002; 27: 19–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evesham M., Fransella F. Stuttering relapse: the effect of combined technique and psychological reconstruction programme. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1985; 20: 237–248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finn P. Recovery without treatment: a review of conceptual and methodological considerations across disciplines. Treatment Efficacy for Stuttering: A Search for Empirical Bases, A Cordes, R Ingham. Singular, San Diego, CA 1998; 3–25
   Google Scholar
• Finn P. Self‐change from stuttering during adolescence and adulthood. Evidence‐based Treatment of Stuttering: Empirical Bases and Applications, A. K Bothe. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 2004; 117–136
   Google Scholar
• Finn P., Felsenfeld S. Recovery from stuttering: the contributions of the qualitative research approach. Advances in Speech–Language Pathology 2004; 6: 159–166
   Google Scholar
• Fransella F. Personal Change and Reconstruction. Academic Press, London 1972
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey M., Callaghan G. Qualitative research methods: an introduction. 2003, Unpublished manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Frame Analysis. Harper & Row, New York, NY 1974
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA 1981
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley M., Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. Tavistock, London 1983
   Google Scholar
• Hayhow R., Cray A. M., Enderby P. Stammering and therapy: views of people who stammer. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2002; 27: 1–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayhow R., Levy C. Working with Stuttering. Winslow, Bicester 1989
   Google Scholar
• Hinkle D. E. The change of personal constructs from the viewpoint of a theory of implications. 1965, Unpublished PhD thesis, Ohio State University
   Google Scholar
• Hymes D. Toward ethnographies of communication: the analysis of communicative events. Language and Social Context: Selected Readings, P. P Giglioli. Penguin, New York, NY 1972; 21–44
   Google Scholar
• James S., Brumfitt S. M., Cudd P. A. Communicating by telephone: views of a group of people with stuttering impairment. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1999; 24: 299–317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly G. A. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton, New York, NY 1955
   Google Scholar
• Kingston M., Hubert A., Onslow M., Jones M., Packman A. Predicting treatment time with the Lidcombe Program: replication and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Communication Disorders 2003; 38: 165–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klompas M., Ross E. Life experiences of people who stutter, and the perceived impact of stuttering on quality of life: personal accounts of South African individuals. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2004; 29: 275–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy M. Therapy talk: analyzing therapeutic discourse. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 2004; 35: 70–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftland J., Loftland L. Analyzing Social Settings. Wadsworth, New York, NY 1984
   Google Scholar
• Mason J. Qualitative Researching. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council. 2000. Framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health (available at: http://www.mrc.ac.uk/index/publications‐electronic_publications.htm)
   Google Scholar
• Merriam S. B. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA 1988
   Google Scholar
• Miles M. B., Huberman A. M. Qualitative Data Analysis 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Patton M. Q. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park, CA 1990
   Google Scholar
• Payne M. Narrative Therapy: An Introduction for Counselors. Sage, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Plexico L., Manning W., DiLollo A. A phenomenological understanding of successful stuttering management. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2005; 30: 1–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popay J. 2000. Cochrane/Campbell qualitative methods groups (available at: http://www.salford.ac/iphrp/cochrane)
   Google Scholar
• Pring T. Two decades of troublesome trials. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2004; 39: 285–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan B., Van Kirk Ryan B. Programmed stuttering therapy for children: comparisons of four establishment programs. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1983; 8: 291–321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks H., Schegloff E., Jefferson G. (eds). Lectures on Conversation. Blackwell, Oxford 1974; 1 and 2
   Google Scholar
• Seale C. Using computers to analyse qualitative data. Doing Qualitative Research, D Silverman. Sage, London 2000; 154–174
   Google Scholar
• Seidel J., Kelle U. Different functions of coding in the analysis of textual data. Computer‐aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and Practice, U Kelle. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1995; 52–61
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan J. G. Conflict theory and avoidance‐reduction therapy. Stuttering: A Second Symposium, J Eisenson. Harper & Row, New York, NY 1975; 97–198
   Google Scholar
• Silverman D. Doing Qualitative Research. Sage, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Simmons‐Mackie N., Damico J. Contributions of qualitative research to the knowledge base of normal communication. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 2003; 12: 144–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart T. Good maintainers and poor maintainers: a personal construct approach to an old problem. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1996; 21: 33–48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart T., Birdsall M. A review of the contribution of personal construct psychology to stammering therapy. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 2001; 14: 215–226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart T., Richardson G. A qualitative study of therapeutic effect from a user's perspective. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2004; 29: 95–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetnowski J., Damico J. A demonstration of the advantages of qualitative methodologies in stuttering research. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2001; 26: 17–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetnowski J., Damico J. Getting out of Procrustes' bed: the needs and benefits of qualitative research in stuttering. Advances in Speech–Language Pathology 2004; 6: 153–158
   Google Scholar
• Van Riper C. The Treatment of Stuttering. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1973
   Google Scholar
• Viney L., Caputi P., Webster D. Computerised content analysis scales: their use in personal construct research. 2000, Paper presented at the 9th Australian Personal Construct Psychology Conference, Bendigo, Australia
   Google Scholar
• Wainwright D. 1997. Can Sociological Research be Qualitative, Critical and Valid?. Qualitative Report, 3, 2 (available at: http://www.nova.edu/sss/qr/qr3‐2/wain)
   Google Scholar
• Ward‐Schofield J. Generalizability in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry in Education, E Eisner, A Peshkin. New York Teachers College Press, New York 1990; 201–231
   Google Scholar
• Williams R. Personal construct theory in use with people who stutter. Stuttering from Theory to Practice, M Fawcus. Whurr, London 1995; 111–134
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott H. Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis and Interpretation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Yaruss S., Quesal R. Partnership between clinicians, researchers, and people who stutter in the evaluation of stuttering treatment outcomes. Stammering Research 2004; 1: 1–15
   Google Scholar