Modal verbs with and without tense: a study of English‐ and Cantonese‐speaking children with specific language impairment

References

• Aksu‐Koc A. The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1988
   Google Scholar
• Bartke S. Dissociations in SLI children's inflectional morphology: new evidence from agreement inflections and noun plurals in German. Paper presented at the Meeting of the European Group for Child Language Disorders, Garderenthe Netherlands, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Burgemeister B., Blum L., Lorge I. Columbia Mental Maturity Scale. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, NY 1972
   Google Scholar
• Bybee J. Morphology: A Study of the Relations Between Meaning and Form. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 1985
   Google Scholar
• Choi S. The development of epistemic sentence‐ending modal forms and functions in Korean children. Modality in Grammar and Discourse, J Bybee, S Fleischman. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 1995; 165–204
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1988
   Google Scholar
• De Jong J. Specific language impairment in Dutch: inflectional morphology and argument structure. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 28. the Netherlands, Groningen 1999
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher P., Leonard L., Stokes S., Wong A. M.‐Y. The expression of aspect in Cantonese‐speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2005; 48: 621–634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J. The interactional basis of the Mandarin modal néng ‘can’. Modality in Grammar and Discourse, J Bybee, S Fleischman. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 1995; 205–238
   Google Scholar
• Hansson K., Leonard L. The use and productivity of verb morphology in specific language impairment: an examination of Swedish. Linguistics 2003; 41: 351–379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klee T., Stokes S., Wong A. M.‐Y., Fletcher P., Gavin W. Utterance length and lexical diversity in Cantonese‐speaking children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2004; 47: 1396–1410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuczaj S. Old and new forms, old and new meanings: the form–function hypothesis revisited. First Language 1982; 3: 55–61
   Google Scholar
• Lee T. H.‐T., Wong C. H., Wong C. S. P. Functional categories in child Cantonese. The Development of Grammatical Competence in Cantonese‐Speaking Children, T. H.‐T Lee, C. H Wong, S Leung, P Man, A Cheung, K Szeto, C. S. P Wong. University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 1996; 155–173
   Google Scholar
• Leiter R. Leiter International Performance Scale. Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL 1979
   Google Scholar
• Leonard L. Functional categories in the grammars of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1995; 38: 1270–1283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard L., Deevy P., Miller C., Charest M., Kurtz R., Rauf L. The use of grammatical morphemes reflecting aspect and modality by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language 2003; 30: 769–795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard L., Eyer J., Bedore L., Grela B. Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English‐speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1997; 40: 1270–1283
   Google Scholar
• Leonard L., Miller C., Gerber E. Grammatical morphology and the lexicon in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1999; 42: 1076–1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linguistic Society of Hong Kong. The LSHK Cantonese Romanization Scheme. Linguistic Society of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 1994
   Google Scholar
• Lyons J. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1968
   Google Scholar
• Matthews S., Yip V. Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Ouhalla J. Functional Categories and Parametric Variation. Routledge, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Papafragou A. The acquisition of modality: Implications for theories of semantic representation. Mind and Language 1998; 13: 370–399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk R., Greenbaum S. A Concise Grammar of Contemporary English. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, NY 1973
   Google Scholar
• Radford A. Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997
   Google Scholar
• Reynell J., Gruber C. Reynell Developmental Language Scales, U.S. Edition. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CA 1990
   Google Scholar
• Reynell J., Huntley M. Reynell Developmental Language Scales: Cantonese Version. NFER‐Nelson, Windsor 1987
   Google Scholar
• Rice M., Wexler K. Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English‐speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1996; 39: 1239–1257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards B. Language Development and Language Differences: A Study of Auxiliary Verb Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990
   Google Scholar
• Roid G., Miller L. Leiter International Performance Scale — Revised. Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL 1997
   Google Scholar
• Wells G. Learning and using the auxiliary verb in English. Language Development, V Lee. Croom Helm, London 1979; 250–270
   Google Scholar
• Werner E., Kresheck J. Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test — II. Janelle, DeKalb, IL 1983
   Google Scholar
• Wong A. M.‐Y., Leonard L., Fletcher P., Stokes S. Questions without movement: A study of Cantonese‐speaking children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2004; 47: 1440–1453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar