Parents' and speech and language therapists' explanatory models of language development, language delay and intervention

References

• Anderson C., Van der Gaag A. An examination of the pattern of preschool referrals to speech and language therapy. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2000; 16: 59–71
   Google Scholar
• Andrews J., Andrews M. Family Based Treatment in Communicative Disorders. Janelle, Sandwich, IL 1990
   Google Scholar
• Booth C. Are parents' beliefs about their children with special needs a framework for individualising intervention or a focus of change?. The Effectiveness of Early Intervention, M. J Guralnick. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1997
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Grounded theory. Rethinking Methods in Psychology, J. A Smith, R Harré, L van Langenhove. Sage, London 1995; 83–122
   Google Scholar
• Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR). Index of Local Deprivation. DETR, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Garcia S., Mendez Perez A., Ortiz A. Mexican American mothers' beliefs about disabilities. implications for early childhood intervention. Remedial and Special Education 2000; 21: 90–100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser B., Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine, Chicago, IL 1967
   Google Scholar
• Glogowska M., Campbell R. Investigating parental views of involvement in pre‐school speech and language therapy. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2000; 35: 391–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glogowska M., Campbell R. Parental views of surveillance for early speech and language difficulties. Children and Society 2004; 18: 266–277
   Google Scholar
• Goldbart J., Marshall J. ‘Pushes and Pulls’ on the parents of children who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2004; 20: 194–208
   Google Scholar
• Granlund M., Bjorck‐Akesson E., Olsson C., Rydeman B. Working with families to introduce augmentative and alternative communication systems. Communicating Without Speech: Practical Augmentative & Alternative Communication, H Cockerill, L Carroll‐Few. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY 2001; 88–102
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T., Taylor R. Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). British Medical Journal 1997; 7110: 740–743
   Google Scholar
• Hammer C. Toward a ‘Thick description’ of families: using ethnography to overcome the obstacles to providing family‐centered early intervention services. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 1998; 7: 5–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness S., Super C. Parents' Cultural Belief Systems. Guilford, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• Harry B., Kalynpur M., Smith‐Lewis M. Professional to parent: developing a posture of reciprocity. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Association for Multicultural Education, OrlandoFL, USA, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Hoff E., Tian C. Socioeconomic status and cultural influences on language. Journal of Communication Disorders 2005; 38: 271–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston J., Wong A. M‐Y. Cultural difference in beliefs and practices concerning talk to children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2002; 45: 916–926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J., Boyle J., Harris F., Harkness A., Nye C. Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment 1998; 2: 1–184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindsay G., Dockrell J. Whose job is it? Parents' concerns about the needs of their children with language problems. Journal of Special Education 2004; 37: 225–235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune‐Nicolich L. Play–language relationships: implications for a theory of symbolic development. Play Interactions, A Gottfried, C Brown. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA 1986
   Google Scholar
• Miles C. Mobilising skills for special education in Pakistan: a personal cross‐cultural experience. International Journal of Special Education 1991; 6: 201–212
   Google Scholar
• Morris T. Turning up or turning off?. Speech and Language Therapy in Practice 2004; 26–27
   Google Scholar
• Peacey L. Mothers' beliefs about their children with primary language impairments. City University, London 2005, PhD thesis
   Google Scholar
• Phillips J. Working with parents: do we mean the same things when we talk about play? Cultural and subcultural issues. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester 1995, MSc thesis
   Google Scholar
• Rannard A., Lyons C., Glenn S. Children with specific language impairment: parental accounts of the early years. Child Health Care 2004; 8: 165–176
   Google Scholar
• Richards H., Emslie C. The ‘doctor’ or the ‘girl from the university’? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing. Family Practice 2000; 17: 71–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff B., Mistry J., Goncu A., Moiser C. Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1993; 58: v–179
   Google Scholar
• Screen R., Anderson N. Multicultural Perspectives in Communication Disorders. Singular, San Diego, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Sigel I., Kim M. The answer depends on the question. A conceptual and methodological analysis of a parent belief–behaviour interview regarding children's learning. Parents' Cultural Beliefs, S Harkness, C Super. Guilford, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• Silverman D. Qualitative Methodology and Sociology. Gower, Aldershot 1985
   Google Scholar
• Spere K., Schmidt L., Theall‐Honey L., Martin‐Chang S. Expressive and receptive language skills of temperamentally shy preschoolers. Infant and Child Development 2004; 13: 123–133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleeck A. Potential cultural bias in training parents as conversational partners with their children who have delays in language development. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology 1994; 67–78
   Google Scholar
• Westby C. Ethnographic interviewing: asking the right questions to the right people in the right ways. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders 1990; 13: 101–111
   Google Scholar