Relationship between perceptual ratings of nasality and nasometry in children/adolescents with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction

References

• Dalston R. M., Seaver E. J. Relative values of various standardised passages in the nasometric assessment of patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 1992; 29: 17–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalston R. M., Warren D., Dalston E. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 1991a; 28: 184–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalston R. M., Warren D., Dalston E. A preliminary investigation concerning use of nasometry in identifying patients with hyponasality and/or nasal airway impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991b; 34: 11–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher S. G. Diagnosing Speech Disorders from Cleft Palate. Grune & Statton, New York, NY 1978; 92–157
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher S. G., Adams L. E., McCutcheon M. J. Cleft palate speech assessment through oral–nasal acoustic measures. Communicative Disorders Related to Cleft Lip and Palate, K. R Bzoch. Little‐Brown, Boston, MA 1989; 246–257
   Google Scholar
• Grunwell P., Harding A. PACSTOYS: A Screening Assessment of Phonological Development. NFER‐Nelson, Windsor 1995
   Google Scholar
• Grunwell P., Sell D., Harding A. Describing cleft palate speech. Analysing Cleft Palate Speech, P Grunwell. Whurr, London 1993; 6–18
   Google Scholar
• Hardin M. A., Van Demark D. R., Morris H. L., Payne M. M. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgements of hypernasality and hyponasality. Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Journal 1992; 29: 346–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden C., Klimacka L. Inter‐rater reliability in cleft palate speech assessment. Journal of Clinical Excellence 2000; 2: 269–173
   Google Scholar
• Hutters B., Henningsson G. Speech outcome following treatment in cross‐linguistic cleft palate studies: methodological implications. Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Journal 2004; 41: 544–549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John A., Sell D., Sweeney T., Harding‐Bell A., Williams A. The cleft audit protocol for speech‐augmented: a validated and reliable measure for auditing cleft speech. Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Journal 2006; 43: 272–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnell M. P. Discrimination of hypernasality and turbulent nasal airflow. Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Journal 1995; 32: 145–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent R. D. Hearing and believing: some limits to the auditory–perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 1996; 5: 7–23
   Google Scholar
• Keuning K., Wieneke G., Van Wijngaarden H., Dejonckere P. The correlation between nasalance and a differential perceptual rating of speech of Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency. Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Journal 2002; 39: 277–284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehn D. P. Assessment of resonance disorders. Speech, Language and Hearing, Vol. II: Pathologies of Speech and Language, N. J Lass, L. V McReynolds, J. C Northern, D. E Yoder. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA 1982; 158
   Google Scholar
• Kuehn D., Moller K. T. Speech and language issues in the cleft palate population: the state of the art. Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Journal 2000; 37: 348–348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehn D., Moon J. B. Velopharyngeal closure force and levator palatini activation levels in varying phonetic contexts. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 1998; 41: 51–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams B. J., Morris H., Shelton R. Cleft Palate Speech. BC Decker, Philadelphia, PA 1990, 2nd Edn
   Google Scholar
• Moon J. B. Evaluation of velopharyngeal function. Cleft Palate: Interdisciplinary Issues and Treatment for Clinicians by Clinicians, K. T Moller, C. D Starr. Pro‐Ed, Austin, TX 1993; 251–306
   Google Scholar
• Paynter E. T., Watterson T. L., Boose W. T. The relationship between nasalance and listener judgements. 1991, Paper presented at the American Cleft Palate‐Craniofacial Association Convention, Hilton Head, SC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Seaver E. J., Dalston R. M., Leeper H. A., Adams L. E. A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 715–721
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sell D. A review of issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders. International Journal of Language Communication Disorders 2005; 42: 103–121
   Google Scholar
• Sell D., Harding A., Grunwell P. GOS.SP.ASS '98: an assessment for speech disorders associated with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction (revised). International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 1999; 34: 17–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner D. L., Norman G. R. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney C. The perceptual and instrumental assessment of nasality and nasal airflow errors associated with velopharyngeal dysfunction. 2000, PhD thesis, Trinity College, Dublin
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney T., Sell D., O'Regan M. Nasalance scores for normal‐speaking Irish children. Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Journal 2004; 41: 168–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watterson T., Hinton J., McFarlane S. Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures in young children. Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Journal 1996; 33: 67–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watterson T., Lewis K. E., Dalston R. M. Interpretation and clinical application of nasalance scores. 1998b, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Speech, Language and Hearing Association
   Google Scholar
• Watterson T., Lewis K. E., Deutsch C. Nasalance and nasality in low‐pressure and high‐pressure speech. Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Journal 1998a; 35: 293–298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watterson T., McFarlane S., Wright D. S. The relationship between nasalance and nasality in children with cleft palate. Journal of Communication Disorders 1993; 26: 13–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitehill T. L. Universal reporting parameters for the speech of individuals with cleft palate‐mapping. 2004, Paper presented at the Workshop on Universal Reporting Parameters for the Speech of Individuals with Cleft Palate, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Wirz S., Mackenzie Beck J. Assessment of voice quality: the vocal profiles analysis scheme. Perceptual Approaches to Communication Disorders, S. Wirz. Whurr, London 1995; 39–58
   Google Scholar