References
- Antonius K., Beukelman D., Reid R. Communication disability of Parkinson's disease. Perceptions of dysarthric speakers and their primary communication partners. Disorders of Motor Speech: Assessment, Treatment and Clinical Characterization, D. A Robin, K. M Yorkston, D. R Beukelman. Paul Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1996; 275–286
- Burley P., Rinaldi W. Effects of sex of listener and of stutterer on ratings of stuttering speakers. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1986; 17: 329–333
- Dagenais P. A., Brown G., Moore R. Speech rate effects upon intelligibility and acceptability of dysarthric speech. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2006; 20: 141–148
- Dagenais P. A., Garcia J. M., Watts C. R. Acceptability and intelligibility of mildly dysarthric speech by different listeners. Neuromotor Speech Disorders: Nature, Assessment and Treatment, M. P Cannito, K. M Yorkston, D. R Beukelman. Paul Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1998; 229–239
- Dagenais P. A., Watts C. R., Turnage L. M., Kennedy S. Intelligibility and acceptability of moderately dysarthric speech by three different types of listeners. Journal of Medical Speech–Language Pathology 1999; 7: 91–96
- De Bodt M., Hernandez‐Diaz H., Van De Heyning P. Intelligibility as a linear combination of dimensions in dysarthric speech. Journal of Communication Disorders 2002; 35: 283–292
- Fox C., Morrison C., Ramig L., Sapir S. Current perspectives on the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT) for individuals with idiopathic Parkinson disease. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 2002; 11: 111–123
- Fox C., Ramig L. Vocal sound pressure level and self‐perception of speech and voice in men and women with idiopathic Parkinson disease. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 1997; 6: 85–94
- Fox C., Ramig L., Ciucci M., Sapir S., McFarland D., Farley B. The Science and Practice of LSVT/LOUD: neural plasticity – principled approach to treating individuals with Parkinson disease and other neurological disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language 2006; 27: 283–299
- Garcia J. M., Cannito M. P. Influence of verbal and nonverbal contexts on the sentence intelligibility of a speaker with dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1996; 39: 750–760
- Gescheider G. A. Psychophysics, Method and Theory. Lawrence Elbraum, Hillsdale, NJ 1976
- Grant G. ‘Oh to eat and speak again’: dysarthria after a brainstem stroke. Bulletin of Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists 1996; 525: 12–13
- Hustad K. A closer look at transcription intelligibility for speakers with dysarthria: evaluation of scoring paradigms and linguistic errors made by listeners. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 2006; 15: 268–277
- Hustad K., Cahill M. Effects of presentation mode and repeated familiarization on intelligibility of dysarthric speech. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 2003; 12: 198–208
- Kent R. D., Weismer G., Kent J. F., Rosenbek J. C. Toward phonetic intelligibility testing in dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1989; 54: 482–499
- Kreiman J., Gerratt B. W., Precoda K. Listener experience and perception of voice quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1990; 33: 103–115
- Lewis K. E., Watterson T. L., Houghton S. M. The influence of listener experience and academic training on ratings of nasality. Journal of Communication Disorders 2003; 36: 49–58
- Liu H., Wan M., Wang S. Features of listeners affecting the perceptions of Mandarin electrolaryngeal speech. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 2005; 57: 9–19
- McHenry M. A. Aerodynamic, acoustic and perceptual measures of nasality following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 281–290
- Molloy D. W., Alemayehu E., Roberts R. A Standardized Mini‐Mental State Examination (SMMSE): its reliability compared with the traditional Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE). American Journal of Psychiatry 1991; 148: 102–105
- Patterson J., Pring T. Listeners' attitudes to stuttering speakers: no evidence of a gender difference. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1991; 16: 201–205
- Poulton E. C. Bias in Quantifying Judgements. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1989
- Ramig L., Countryman S., Thompson L., Horii Y. Comparison of two forms of intensive speech treatment for Parkinson. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1995; 38: 1232–1251
- Schiavetti N., Metz D., Sitler R. Construct validity of direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling: evidence from a study of the hearing‐impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1981; 24: 441–445
- Schiavetti N., Sacco P. R., Metz D., Sitler R. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of stuttering severity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1983; 26: 568–573
- Scott S., Caird F. I., Williams B. O. Evidence for an apparent sensory speech disorder in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1984; 47: 840–843
- Shuster I., Durrant J. D. Towards a better understanding of self‐produced speech. Journal of Communication Disorders 2003; 36: 1–11
- Solomon M., Robin D., Lorell D., Rodnitsky R., Luschei E. Tongue function testing in Parkinson disease: indication of fatigue. Motor Speech Disorders: Advances in Assessment and Treatment, J. A Till, K. M Yorkston, D. R Beukelman. Paul Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1994; 147–160
- Southwood M. H. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of naturalness and bizarreness of the dysarthria associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Medical Speech–Language Pathology 1996; 4: 13–25
- Southwood H. M., Flege G. Scaling foreign accent: direct magnitude estimation versus interval scaling. Journal of Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1999; 5: 335–349
- Southwood H. M., Weismer G. Listener judgments of the bizarreness, acceptability, naturalness, and normalcy of the dysarthria associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Medical Speech–Language Pathology 1993; 1: 151–161
- Srittzer S., Liss M., Caviness J., Adler C. An exploration of familiarization effects on the perception of hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthric speech. Journal of Medical Speech–Language Pathology 2000; 8: 285–293
- Tjaden K. K., Liss J. M. The role of listener familiarity in the perception of dysarthric speech. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1995; 9: 139–154
- Walshe M. The impact of acquired neurological dysarthria on the speaker's self‐concept. Journal of Clinical Speech and Language Studies 2003; 12/13: 9–33
- Weismer G., Laures J. Direct magnitude estimation of speech intelligibility: effects of a chosen standard. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research 2002; 45: 421–433
- Wertz R. T., Henschel C. R., Auther L. L., Ashford J. R., Kirschner H. S. Affective prosodic disturbance subsequent to right hemisphere stroke: a clinical application. Journal of Neurolinguistics 1998; 2: 89–102
- Yorkston K. M., Beukelman D. R. Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech. CC Publ., Tigard, OR 1981
- Yorkston K. M., Beukelman D. R. The influence of judge familiarisation with the speaker on dysarthric speech intelligibility. Clinical Dysarthria, W Berry. College Hill Press, Boston, MA 1983; 155–163
- Yorkston K. M., Hammen V. L., Dowden P. Index of contextual intelligibility: a perceptual analysis of intelligible versus unintelligible productions in severe dysarthria. Motor Speech Disorders: Advances in Assessment and Treatment, J. A Till, K. M Yorkston, D. R Beukelman. Paul Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1994; 55–64