Temporary resident evil? Managing diverse impacts of second-home tourism

References

• Adamiak, C. (2016). Cottage sprawl: Spatial development of second homes in Bory Tucholskie, Poland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 96–106. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamiak, C., Vepsäläinen, M., Strandell, A., Hiltunen, M. J., Pitkänen, K., Hall, C. M., … Åkerlund, U. (2015). Second home tourism in Finland. (22). Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE).
   Google Scholar
• ASTRID. (2015). Data on Swedish second homes and second-home owners, for the years 1997 and 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Back, A., & Marjavaara, R. (2017). Mapping an invisible population: The uneven geography of second-home tourism. Tourism Geographies, 19(4), 595–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. (2014). Host community perceptions of the contributions of second homes. Annals of Leisure Research, 17(1), 10–26. doi: 10.1080/11745398.2014.886156
   Google Scholar
• Blondy, C. B., Plumejeaud, C., Vacher, L., & Vye, D. (2014). Do second home owners only play a secondary role in coastal territories? A case study in Charente-Maritime (France). Tourism, Leisure and Global Change, 1, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brida, J. G., Osti, L., & Santifaller, E. (2009). Second homes and the need for policy planning. TOURISMOS, 6(1), 141–163.
   Google Scholar
• Clout, H. D. (1971). Second homes in the Auvergne. Geographical Review, 61(4), 530–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. (2016). Interviewing. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (pp. 149–188). Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farstad, M., & Rye, J. F. (2013). Second home owners, locals and their perspectives on rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 30, 41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flognfeldt, T. (2002). Second-home ownership: A sustainable semi-migration. In C. M. Hall & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Tourism and migration: New relationships between production and consumption (pp. 187–203). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Frykholm, K. (2017). Strategier för fritidshusturism? En översikt av Sveriges kommuner [Strategies for second-home tourism? An overview of Sweden’s municipalities]. (BA), Umeå University, Umeå.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T. (2008). The end of tourism, or endings in tourism. In P. M. Burns, & M. Novelli (Eds.), Tourism and Mobilities (pp. 1–14). Wallingford: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Gallent, N. (1997). Practice forum improvement grants, second homes and planning control in England and Wales: A policy review. Planning Practice & Research, 12(4), 401–410. doi: 10.1080/02697459716419
   Google Scholar
• Gallent, N. (2007). Second homes, community and a hierarchy of dwelling. Area, 39(1), 97–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallent, N. (2014). The social value of second homes in rural communities. Housing, Theory and Society, 31(2), 174–191. doi: 10.1080/14036096.2013.830986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallent, N., Mace, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2003). Dispelling a myth? Second homes in rural Wales. Area, 35(3), 271–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallent, N., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2001). Second homes and the UK planning system. Planning Practice and Research, 16(1), 59–69. doi: 10.1080/02697450120049579
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, R. D. S. D. E., Pinto, H. E. D. R. S. D. C., & Almeida, C. M. B. R. D. (2017). Second home tourism in the Algarve: The perception of public managers. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo, 11(2), 197–217. doi: 10.7784/rbtur.v11i2.1246
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. M. (2005). Tourism: Rethinking the social science of mobility. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. M. (2015a). On the mobility of tourism mobilities. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(1), 7–10. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2014.971719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C. M. (2015b). Second homes planning, policy and governance. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 7(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/19407963.2014.964251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halseth, G. (2004). The “cottage” privilege: Increasingly elite landscapes of second homes in Canada. In C. M. Hall & D. K. Müller (Eds.), Tourism, mobility and second homes: Between elite landscape and common ground (pp. 35–54). Clevedon: Channel View Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn, G., & Marjavaara, R. (2018). Displacement and second home tourism: A debate still relevant or time to move on? In C. M. Hall & D. K. Müller (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second home tourism and mobilities (pp. 98–111). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn, G., & Visser, G. (2004). Second homes and small-town (re)development: The case of Clarens. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences, 32(1), 105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn, G., & Visser, G. (2010). The role of second homes in local economic development in five small South African towns. Development Southern Africa, 27(4), 547–562. doi: 10.1080/0376835x.2010.508585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijbens, E. H. (2012). Sustaining a village's social fabric? Sociologia Ruralis, 52(3), 332–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdalen, E. (1980). Second homes in Norway: A controversial planning problem. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift [Norwegian Journal of Geography], 34, 139–144.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, L., & Müller, D. K. (2017). Coping with second home tourism: Responses and strategies of private and public service providers in Western Sweden. Current Issues in Tourism, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2017.1411339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjavaara, R. (2008). Second home tourism: The root to displacement in Sweden? (PhD), Umeå University, Umeå.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, D. K. (2002). German second home development in Sweden. In C. M. Hall & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Tourism and migration: New relationships between production and consumption (pp. 169–185). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, D. K. (2011). Second homes in rural areas: Reflections on a troubled history. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift [Norwegian Journal of Geography], 65(3), 137–143. doi: 10.1080/00291951.2011.597872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, D. K., Hall, C. M., & Keen, D. (2004). Second home tourism impact, planning and management. In C. M. Hall & D. K. Müller (Eds.), Tourism, mobility and second homes: Between elite landscape and common ground (pp. 15–32). Clevedon: Channel View Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, D. K., & Marjavaara, R. (2012). From second home to primary residence: Migration towards recreational properties in Sweden 1991-2005. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 103(1), 53–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00674.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, D. K., Nordin, U., & Marjavaara, R. (2010). Fritidsboendes relationer till den svenska landsbygden [Second-home dwellers’ relation to the Swedish countryside]. Retrieved from GERUM Kulturgeografisk arbetsrapport.
   Google Scholar
• Nordin, U., & Marjavaara, R. (2012). The local non-locals: Second home owners associational engagement in Sweden. Tourism, 60(3), 293–305.
   Google Scholar
• Osbaldiston, N., Picken, F., & Duffy, M. (2015). Characteristics and future intentions of second homeowners: A case study from Eastern Victoria, Australia. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 7(1), 62–76. doi: 10.1080/19407963.2014.934689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overvåg, K. (2009). Second homes in Eastern Norway: From marginal land to commodity. (PhD), Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Overvåg, K. (2010). Second homes and maximum yield in marginal land: The re-resourcing of rural land in Norway. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(1), 3–16. doi:10.1177%2F0969776409350690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overvåg, K., & Berg, N. G. (2011). Second homes, rurality and contested space in Eastern Norway. Tourism Geographies, 13(3), 417–442. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2011.570778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, C. (2011). Affluence, mobility and second home ownership. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, I. (2011). Fritidshuset som planeringsdilemma [The second home as a planning dilemma]. (PhD), Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, I. (2015). Second homes, legal framework and planning practice according to environmental sustainability in coastal areas: The Swedish setting. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 7(1), 48–61. doi: 10.1080/19407963.2014.933228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planning and Building Act. (2010). Plan- och bygglagen [Planning and Building Act]. Retrieved from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/plan–och-bygglag-2010900_sfs-2010-900
   Google Scholar
• Rinne, J., Paloniemi, R., Tuulentie, S., & Kietäväinen, A. (2015). Participation of second-home users in local planning and decision-making: A study of three cottage-rich locations in Finland. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 7(1), 98–114. doi: 10.1080/19407963.2014.909818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertsson, L., & Marjavaara, R. (2015). The seasonal buzz: Knowledge transfer in a temporary setting. Tourism Planning & Development, 12(3), 251–265. doi: 10.1080/21568316.2014.947437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, G. M. (1998). Methods and techniques in human geography. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rye, J. F. (2011). Conflicts and contestations: Rural populations’ perspectives on the second homes phenomenon. Journal of Rural Studies, 27(3), 263–274. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38, 207–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SKL. (2017). Kommunernas åtaganden [The responsibilities of municipalities]. Retrieved from https://skl.se/tjanster/kommunerlandsting/faktakommunerochlandsting/kommunernasataganden.3683.html
   Google Scholar
• Social Services Act. (2001). Socialtjänstlagen (2001:453) [Social Services Act]. Retrieved from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/socialtjanstlag-2001453_sfs-2001-453
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. (2014). Undersökningarna av levnadsförhållanden, semesterresande och fritidshus. Andel personer i procent efter indikator, ålder, kön och årsintervall [Surveys of living conditions, vacations and second homes. Percentage of people by indicator, age, gender and year range]. Retrieved from http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/sv/ssd/START__LE__LE0101__LE0101F/LE0101F01/?rxid=8e3464cf-d8c9-4774-8235-69a5d292176c
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. (2018a). Befolkningens medelålder efter region och kön. År 1998-2017 [The population's average age by region and sex. Year 1998-2017]. Retrieved from http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/sv/ssd/START__BE__BE0101__BE0101B/BefolkningMedelAlder
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. (2018b). Folkmängden efter region, civilstånd, ålder och kön. År 1968–2017 [Population by region, marital status, age and sex. Year 1968-2017]. Retrieved from http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/sv/ssd/START__BE__BE0101__BE0101A/BefolkningNy/?rxid=f5790986-ce9d-4cdc-9658-fbc9c700b7ef
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. (2018c). Kommuner i siffror [Municipalities in numbers]. Retrieved from https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/sverige-i-siffror/kommuner-i-siffror/
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Tax Agency. (2015). Kommunal fastighetsavgift kalenderåren 2008–2016 [Municipal property fee for years 2008-2016]. Retrieved from https://www.skatteverket.se/download/18.5a85666214dbad743ff17283/1443419155035/Kommunal+fastighetsavgift+kalender%C3%A5ren+2008-2016_Version+1.0_2015-09-28.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar