A multicriteria-optimization model for cultural heritage renovation projects and public-private partnerships in the hospitality industry

References

• Abbasianjahromi, H., Rajaie, H., Shakeri, E., & Kazemi, O. (2016). A new approach for subcontractor selection in the construction industry based on portfolio theory. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(3), 346–356. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.897983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamus-Matuszyńska, A., Michnik, J., & Polok, G. (2019). A systemic approach to city image building. The case of Katowice city. Sustainability, 11(16), 4470. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaś, D., & Michnik, J. (2019). Evaluation of the impact of strategic offers on the financial and strategic health of the company—a soft system dynamics approach. Mathematics, 7(2), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7020208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basirati, M., Akbari Jokar, M. R., & Hassannayebi, E. (2020). Bi-objective optimization approaches to many-to-many hub location routing with distance balancing and hard time window. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(17), 13267–13288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04666-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boniotti, C. (2021). The public–private–people partnership (P4) for cultural heritage management purposes. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-12-2020-0186
   Google Scholar
• Bozorg-Haddad, O., Zolghadr-Asli, B., & Loáiciga, H. A. (2021). A handbook on multi-attribute decision-making methods. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M. Y., & Kang, S. T. (2012). Integrated fuzzy preference relations with decision utilities for construction contractor selection. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 35(8), 1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2012.708510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, P., & Paul, S. K. (2020). Applications of MCDM methods in research on corporate sustainability: A systematic literature review. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(2), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0284
   Google Scholar
• de Araújo, M. C. B., Alencar, L. H., & Mota, C. M. M. (2016, October 9–12). Model for contractor performance evaluation in construction industry. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) (pp. 002631–002635). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• El-khalek, H. A., Aziz, R. F., & Morgan, E. S. (2019). Identification of construction subcontractor prequalification evaluation criteria and their impact on project success. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(1), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sayegh, S. M., Basamji, M., Haj Ahmad, A., & Zarif, N. (2019). Key contractor selection criteria for green construction projects in the UAE. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1610545.
   Google Scholar
• Enshassi, A., Mohamed, S., & Modough, Z. (2013). Contractors’ selection criteria: Opinions of Palestinian construction professionals. International Journal of Construction Management, 13(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2013.10773203
   Google Scholar
• Farooque, M., Jain, V., Zhang, A., & Li, Z. (2020). Fuzzy DEMATEL analysis of barriers to blockchain-based life cycle assessment in China. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 147, 106684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorczak-Cisak, M., Kowalska-Koczwara, A., Pachla, F., Radziszewska-Zielina, E., Szewczyk, B., Śladowski, G., & Tatara, T. (2020). Fuzzy Model for selecting a form of use alternative use for a historic building to be subjected to adaptive reuse. Energies, 13(11), 2809. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei, L., Lu, J., & Feng, Y. (2020). An extended best-worst multicriteria decision-making method by belief functions and its applications in hospital service evaluation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 142, 106355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontela, E., & Gabus, A. (1976). The DEMATEL observer, DEMATEL 1976 report. Battelle Geneva Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Garg, C. P., & Sharma, A. (2020). Sustainable outsourcing partner selection and evaluation using an integrated BWM–VIKOR framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(2), 1529–1557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0261-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., Jha, P. C., Agarwal, V., & Darbari, J. D. (2019). Environmental management partner selection for reverse supply chain collaboration: A sustainable approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 236, 784–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., Mina, H., Esmaeili, A., & Gholami-Zanjani, S. M. (2020). An integrated hybrid approach for circular supplier selection and closed loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdan, S., & Cheaitou, A. (2017). Supplier selection and order allocation with green criteria: An MCDM and multi-objective optimization approach. Computers & Operations Research, 81, 282–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2016.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasnain, M., Thaheem, M. J., & Ullah, F. (2018). Best value contractor selection in road construction projects: ANP-based decision support system. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(6), 695–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0199-2
   Google Scholar
• Jamshidi, A., Jamshidi, F., Ait-Kadi, D., & Ramudhin, A. (2019). A review of priority criteria and decision-making methods applied in selection of sustainable city logistics initiatives and collaboration partners. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15-16), 5175–5193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1540892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juan, Y. K., Perng, Y. H., Castro-Lacouture, D., & Lu, K. S. (2009). Housing refurbishment contractors selection based on a hybrid fuzzy-QFD approach. Automation in Construction, 18(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, D., Mina, H., Nosrati-Abarghooee, S., & Khosrojerdi, G. (2020). Sustainable circular supplier selection: A novel hybrid approach. Science of the Total Environment, 722, 137936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasabreh, N. S. S., & Tarawneh, S. A. (2019). Investigating the impact of contractor’s performance on the success of Jordanian residential construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1560547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaviani, M. A., Tavana, M., Kumar, A., Michnik, J., Niknam, R., & de Campos, E. A. R. (2020). An integrated framework for evaluating the barriers to successful implementation of reverse logistics in the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazancoglu, Y., Kazancoglu, I., & Sagnak, M. (2018). Fuzzy DEMATEL-based green supply chain management performance: Application in cement industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(2), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2017-0121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen, P., Moskowitz, H., & Wallenius, J. (1992). Multiple criteria decision support-A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 63(3), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90155-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., & Dixit, G. (2019). A novel hybrid MCDM framework for WEEE recycling partner evaluation on the basis of green competencies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, F., Lv, X., Fang, J., Sun, G., & Li, Q. (2020). Multiobjective discrete optimization using the TOPSIS and entropy method for protection of pedestrian lower extremity. Thin-Walled Structures, 152, 106349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.106349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., Shen, J. Q., Meng, Z. J., & Sun, F. H. (2018). A survey on the establishment and application of social capital partner selection system for the new profit PPP project. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(10), 3726–3737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0489-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., & Wei, Q. (2018). Risk evaluation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure public-private partnership projects in China using fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, H. W., Liou, J. J., Wang, H. S., & Tsai, Y. S. (2018). An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S., & Cheong, C. (2014). The role of public-private Partnerships and the third sector in conserving heritage buildings, sites, and historic urban areas. The Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mardan, E., Govindan, K., Mina, H., & Gholami-Zanjani, S. M. (2019). An accelerated benders decomposition algorithm for a bi-objective green closed loop supply chain network design problem. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1499–1514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michnik, J. (2013). Weighted influence Non-linear gauge system (WINGS)–An analysis method for the systems of interrelated components. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(3), 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michnik, J. (2018). The WINGS method with multiple networks and its application to innovation projects selection. International Journal of Applied Management Science, 10(2), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAMS.2018.092077
   Google Scholar
• Michnik, J., & Grabowski, A. (2020). Modeling uncertainty in the wings method using interval arithmetic. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 19(01), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622019500494
   Google Scholar
• Mina, H., Kannan, D., Gholami-Zanjani, S. M., & Biuki, M. (2021). Transition towards circular supplier selection in petrochemical industry: A hybrid approach to achieve sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 125273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, A., Harris, I., & Govindan, K. (2019). A hybrid MCDM-FMOO approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation. International Journal of Production Economics, 217, 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morkunaite, Z., Bausys, R., & Kazimieras Zavadskas, E. (2019). Contractor selection for Sgraffito decoration of cultural heritage buildings using the WASPAS-SVNS method. Sustainability, 11(22), 6444. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morkunaite, Z., Podvezko, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Bausys, R. (2019). Contractor selection for renovation of cultural heritage buildings by PROMETHEE method. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 19(4), 1056–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2019.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morkūnaitė, Ž, Podvezko, V., & Kutut, V. (2017). Selection criteria for evaluating contractors of cultural heritage objects. Procedia Engineering, 208, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.025
   Google Scholar
• Mostafaeipour, A., Sedaghat, A., Hedayatpour, M., & Jahangiri, M. (2020). Location planning for production of bioethanol fuel from agricultural residues in the south of Caspian Sea. Environmental Development, 33, 100500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musumba, G. W., & Wario, R. D. (2020). A hybrid technique for partner selection in virtual enterprises. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12(4), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2019.1655212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr, A. K., Tavana, M., Alavi, B., & Mina, H. (2021). A novel fuzzy multi-objective circular supplier selection and order allocation model for sustainable closed-loop supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 124994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto-Morote, A., & Ruz-Vila, F. (2012). A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making model for construction contractor prequalification. Automation in Construction, 25, 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Barrios, M., Miranda-De la Hoz, C., López-Meza, P., Petrillo, A., & De Felice, F. (2020). A case of food supply chain management with AHP. DEMATEL, and TOPSIS. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 27(1-2), 104–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, C., & Barua, M. K. (2016). An analysis of integrated robust hybrid model for third-party reverse logistics partner selection under fuzzy environment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 108, 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radziszewska-Zielina, E., & Śladowski, G. (2017). Supporting the selection of a variant of the adaptation of a historical building with the Use of fuzzy modelling and structural analysis. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 26, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Mardani, A., Cavallaro, F., Alrasheedi, M., & Alrashidi, A. (2020). A novel approach to extended fuzzy TOPSIS based on new divergence measures for renewable energy sources selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257, 120352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Rezaei, G., Liao, H., & Mardani, A. (2020). Extended pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method based on similarity measure for sustainable recycling partner selection. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 22(2), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00689-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, M. K., Kumar, V. S. S., & Kumar, P. R. (2018). Optimal contractor selection in construction industry: The fuzzy way. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 99(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-018-0271-1
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The Analytic network process. RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Semaan, N., & Salem, M. (2017). A deterministic contractor selection decision support system for competitive bidding. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-06-2015-0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, M., & Pant, M. (2021). A review of selected weighing methods in MCDM with a case study. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 12(1), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-01033-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solangi, Y. A., Tan, Q., Mirjat, N. H., & Ali, S. (2019). Evaluating the strategies for sustainable energy planning in Pakistan: An integrated SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stević, Ž, Pamučar, D., Puška, A., & Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, 106231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavana, M., Khosrojerdi, G., Mina, H., & Rahman, A. (2020a). A new dynamic two-stage mathematical programming model under uncertainty for project evaluation and selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 149, 106795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavana, M., Mousavi, H., Nasr, A. K., & Mina, H. (2021). A fuzzy weighted influence non-linear gauge system with application to advanced technology assessment at NASA. Expert Systems with Applications, 182, 115274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavana, M., Mousavi, S. M. H., Mina, H., & Salehian, F. (2020b). A dynamic decision support system for evaluating peer-to-peer rental accommodations in the sharing economy. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylan, O., Kabli, M. R., Porcel, C., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). Contractor selection for construction projects using consensus tools and big data. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(4), 1267–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0312-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosarkani, B. M., & Amin, S. H. (2018). A multi-objective model to configure an electronic reverse logistics network and third party selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 662–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulubeyli, S., & Kazaz, A. (2016). Fuzzy multicriteria decision making model for subcontractor selection in international construction projects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(2), 210–234. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.984363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahdani, B., Mousavi, S. M., Hashemi, H., Mousakhani, M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2013). A new compromise solution method for fuzzy group decision-making problems with an application to the contractor selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(2), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2012.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. G., Zhang, A., Deakins, E., Luthra, S., & Mangla, S. (2019). A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach to supply partner selection in continuous aid humanitarian supply chains. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1), 1517–1550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2981-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., & Niu, D. (2019). Research on project post-evaluation of wind power based on improved ANP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of trapezoid subordinate function improved by interval number. Renewable Energy, 132, 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Tian, Z., Xi, W., Tan, Y. R., & Deng, Y. (2021). The influencing factors of China’s green building development: An analysis using RBF-WINGS method. Building and Environment, 188, 107425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., & Barnes, D. (2011). A literature review of decision-making models and approaches for partner selection in agile supply chains. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17(4), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2011.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., Barnes, D., Rosenberg, D., & Luo, X. (2009). An analytic network process-mixed integer multi-objective programming model for partner selection in agile supply chains. Production Planning and Control, 20(3), 254–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280902856047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdi, M., Khan, F., Abbassi, R., & Rusli, R. (2020). Improved DEMATEL methodology for effective safety management decision-making. Safety Science, 127, 104705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolghadr-Asli, B., Bozorg-Haddad, O., Enayati, M., & Chu, X. (2021). A review of 20-year applications of multi-attribute decision-making in environmental and water resources planning and management. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 14379–14404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668–021–01278–3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar