Queering the family? A multi-layered analysis of relations of inequality in transnational adoption

REFERENCES

• Ahmed, S.2006. “Orientations: Toward a Queer Phenomenology.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies12 (4): 543–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algemene Directie Statistiek en Economische Informatie op basis van het Rijksregister, (Homohuwelijken; accessed 29 December, 2013). http://statbel.fgov.be/nl/statistieken/cijfers/bevolking/huwelijken_echtscheidingen_samenwoning/huwelijken/homosexueel/.eel/.
   Google Scholar
• Bordo, S.2005. “Adoption.” Hypatia20 (1): 230–237.
   Google Scholar
• Borghs, P.2010. Juridische Gids Voor Ouderschap Voor Holebi's and Transgenders. Gelijke Kansen in Vlaanderen.
   Google Scholar
• Borghs, P., and B.Eeckhout. 2010. “Lgb Rights in Belgium, 1999–2007: A Historical Survey of a Velvet Revolution.” International Journal of Law, Policy & the Family24 (1): 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Brakman, S.-V., and S. J.Scholz. 2006. “Adoption, Art, and a Re-Conception of the Maternal Body: Toward Embodied Maternity.” Hypatia21 (1): 54–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brysk, A.2004. “Children across Borders: Patrimony, Property or Persons?” In People out of Place: Globalization, Human Rights, and the Citizenship Gap, edited by A.Brysk, and G.Shafir, 153–173. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cadoret, A.2009. “The Contribution of Homparental Families to the Current Debate on Kinship.” In European Kinship in the Age of Biotechnology, edited by J.Edwards, and C.Salazar, 79–96. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V.2002. “Resistance and Normalization in the Construction of Lesbian and Gay Families: A Discursive Analysis.” In Lesbian and Gay Psychology: New Perspectives, edited by A.Coyle, and C.Kitzinger, 98–116. Oxford: BPS Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Colen, S.1995. “‘Like a Mother to Them’: Stratified Reproduction and West Indian Childcare Workers and Employers in New York.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, edited by R.Rapp, and F. D.Ginsburg, 78–102. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dambach, M.2011. “The International Legal Context Governing Intercountry Adoptions by Gay Men and Lesbians.” Adoption & Fostering Journal35 (1): 65–77.
   Google Scholar
• De Graeve, K.2013a. “Festive Gatherings and Culture Work in Flemish-Ethiopian Adoptive Families.” European Journal of Cultural Studies16 (5): 548–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graeve, K.2013b. “‘They Have Our Culture’: Negotiating Migration in Belgian–Ethiopian Transnational Adoption.” Ethnos. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/00141844.2013.813565.
   Google Scholar
• De Graeve, K., and C.Longman. 2013. “Intensive Mothering of Ethiopian Adoptive Children in Flanders, Belgium.” In Parenting in Global Perspective. Negotiating Ideologies of Kinship, Self and Politics, edited by C.Faircloth, D.Hoffman, and L. L.Layne, 136–150. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Direction de l'Adoption ACC (rapports d'activités; accessed 16 January, 2014). http://www.adoptions.be/index.php?id=3780/.
   Google Scholar
• Dorow, S. K.2006. Transnational Adoption: A Cultural Economy of Race, Gender, and Kinship. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eeckhout, B., and D.Paternotte. 2011. “A Paradise for Lgbt Rights? The Paradox of Belgium.” Journal of Homosexuality58 (8): 1058–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng, D. L.2003. “Transnational Adoption and Queer Diasporas.” Social Text21 (3 76): 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Eng, D. L.2010. The Feeling of Kinship: Queer Liberalism and the Racialization of Intimacy. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fabian, J.1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M.2010. “Filling the Glass: Gender Perspectives on Families.” Journal of Marriage and Family72 (3): 420–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, T. D.2006. “Racial Europeanization.” Ethnic and Racial Studies29 (2): 331–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D.1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies14 (3): 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastrup, K.1995. A Passage to Anthropology: Between Experience and Theory. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Homans, M.2002. “Adoption and Essentialism.” Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature21 (2): 257–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högbacka, R.2008. “The Quest for a Child of One's Own: Parents, Markets and Transnational Adoption.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies39 (3): 311–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübinette, T.2006. “From Orphan Trains to Babylifts. Colonial Trafficking, Empire Building, and Social Engineering.” In Outsiders Within: Writing on Transracial Adoption, edited by J. J.Trenka, J.Sudbury, and S. Y.Shin, 139–149. Cambridge: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kind & Gezin (Activiteitenverslagen; accessed 16 January, 2014). http://www.kindengezin.be/brochures-en-rapporten/rapporten/adoptie/.
   Google Scholar
• Langdridge, D.2013. “Gay Fathers, Gay Citizenship: On the Power of Reproductive Futurism and Assimilation.” Citizenship Studies17 (6–7): 728–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifsen, E.2013. “Child Circulation in and out of the Secure Zone of Childhood: A View from the Urban Margins in Ecuador.” Childhood20 (3): 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinaweaver, J.2011. “Adoption and the Politics of Modern Families.” S&F Online9 (1–3): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mccann, D., and F.Tasker. 2000. “Lesbian and Gay Parents as Foster Carers and Adoptive Parents.” In The Dynamics of Adoption, edited by A.Treacher, and I.Katz, 147–164. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mccormack, C.2004. “Storying Stories: A Narrative Approach to in-Depth Interview Conversations.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology7 (3): 219–236.
   Google Scholar
• Mertus, J. B.2010. “Barriers, Hurdles, and Discrimination: The Current Status of Lgbt Intercountry Adoption and Why Changes Must Be Made to Effectuate the Best Interests of the Child.” Capital University Law Review39: 271–311.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, J. S.1994. Kinship with Strangers: Adoption and Interpretations of Kinship in American Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T.1991. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” In Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, edited by C. T.Mohanty, A.Russo, and L.Torres, 52–80. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. P.2006. “Shopping for Children in the International Marketplace.” In Outsiders Within: Writing on Transracial Adoption, edited by J. J.Trenka, J.Sudbury, and S. Y.Shin, 89–104. Cambridge: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P.2012. “Origins and Originators: Lesbian Couples Negotiating Parental Identities and Sperm Donor Conception.” Culture, Health & Sexuality14 (3): 297–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. M.2006. “Adoptive Maternal Bodies: A Queer Paradigm for Rethinking Mothering?” Hypatia21 (1): 201–226.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. M.2009. “Is Queer Parenting Possible?” In Who's Your Daddy? And Other Writings on Queer Parenting, edited by R.Epstein. Toronto: Sumach Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paternotte, D.2008. “Les Lieux D'activisme: Le «Mariage Gai» En Belgique, En France Et En Espagne.” Canadian Journal of Political Science41 (4): 935–952.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, K.2001. “The Square of Intimate Citizenship: Some Preliminary Proposals.” Citizenship Studies5 (3): 237–253.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, K.2003. Intimate Citizenship: Private Decisions and Public Dialogues. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, K.2005. “Intimate Citizenship in an Unjust World.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Inequalities, edited by M.Romero, and E.Margolis, 75–99. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Power, J., A.Perlesz, R.Brown, M.Schofield, M.Pitts, R.Mcnair, and A.Bickerdike. 2010. “Diversity, Tradition and Family: Australian Same-Sex Attracted Parents and Their Families.” Gay & Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review6 (2): 66–81.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, B.2006. “Narrative Accounts of Origins: A Blind Spot in the Intersectional Approach?” European Journal of Women's Studies13 (3): 277–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K.2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, R., and F. D.Ginsburg. 1995. “Introduction: Conceiving the New World Order.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, edited by R.Rapp, and F. D.Ginsburg, 1–17. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, R.2010. The Road to Evergreen. Adoption, Attachment Therapy, and the Promise of Family. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, R.2013. “Movement without Movement: ‘Rad Kids’ as Circulatory Problems in United States Adoption Pipelines.” Childhood20 (3): 337–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker, R., and B.Yngvesson. 2013. “Fixity and Fluidity - Circulations, Children, and Childhood.” Children, and Childhood. Childhood20 (3): 297–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadele, G.2011. “Heteronormativity and ‘Troubled’ Masculinities among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Addis Ababa.” Culture, Health & Sexuality13 (4): 457–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias, S.2005. “Several Steps Behind: Gay and Lesbian Adoption.” In Adoption Matters: Philosophical and Feminist Essays, edited by S. A.Haslanger, and C.Witt, 95–111. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wichelen, S.2013. “Medicine as Moral Technology: Somatic Economies and the Making up of Adoptees.” Medical Anthropology23 (2): 109–127.
   Google Scholar
• Waaldijk, K.2004. “Others May Follow: The Introduction of Marriage, Quasi-Marriage, and Semi-Marriage for Same-Sex Couples in European Countries.” New England Law Review38 (3): 569–590.
   Google Scholar
• Wilets, J. D.2011. “From Divergence to Convergence? A Comparative and International Law Analysis of Lgbti Rights in the Context of Race and Post-Colonialism.” Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law21: 631–685.
   Google Scholar
• Yngvesson, B.1997. “Negotiating Motherhood: Identity and Difference in “Open” Adoptions.” Law & Society Review31 (1): 31–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yngvesson, B., and M. A.Mahoney. 2000. “‘As One Should, Ought and Wants To Be’: Belonging and Authenticity in Identity Narratives.” Theory, Culture & Society17 (6): 77–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar