‘Nothing will stop me from giving the gift of life’: a qualitative analysis of egg donor forum posts

References

• Almeling, R. 2007. “Selling Genes, Selling Gender: Egg Agencies, Sperm Banks, and the Medical Market in Genetic Material.” American Sociological Review 72 (3): 319–340. doi:10.1177/000312240707200301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeling, R. 2009. “Gender and the Value of Bodily Goods: Commodification in Egg and Sperm Donation.” Law and Contemporary Problems 72: 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Almeling, R. 2011. Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, S. 2011. “Reproductive Agency and Projects: Germans Searching for Egg Donation in Spain and the Czech Republic.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23 (5): 600–608. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.06.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracewell-Milnes, T., S. Saso, S. Bora, A. M. Ismail, M. Al-Memar, A. H. Hamed, H. Abdalla, and M. Y. Thum. 2016. “Investigating Psychosocial Attitudes, Motivations and Experiences of Oocyte Donors, Recipients and Egg Sharers: A Systematic Review.” Human Reproduction Update 22 (4): 450–465. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmw006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2019. “Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11 (4): 589–597. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, J. R., L. B. Gezinski, and S. Karandikar-Chheda. 2012. “A Comprehensive Review of Reproductive Egg Donation Web Sites.” Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet 16 (1): 53–65. doi:10.1080/15398285.2012.647604
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, A. 2010. “Giving ‘Til It Hurts: Egg Donation and the Costs of Altruism.” Feminist Formations 22 (2): 80–100.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, C. R., and E. Heidt-Forsythe. 2012. “Gendered Eugenics and the Problematic of Free Market Reproductive Technologies: Sperm and Egg Donation in the United States.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 37 (3): 719–747. doi:10.1086/662964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, S., G. M. Chambers, J. De Mouzon, K. G. Nygren, F. Zegers-Hochschild, R. Mansour, O. Ishihara, M. Banker, and G. D. Adamson. 2016. “International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies World Report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010.” Human Reproduction 31 (7): 1588–1609. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach, G., and J. E. Till. 2001. “Ethical Issues in Qualitative Research on Internet Communities.” BMJ 323 (7321): 1103–1105. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gezinski, L. B., S. Karandikar, and J. R. Carter. 2012. “The Use of Emotional Imagery and Language in Egg Donation Web Sites.” Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet 16 (4): 390–402. doi:10.1080/15398285.2012.701174
   Google Scholar
• Gürtin, Z. B., K. K. Ahuja, and S. Golombok. 2012. “Egg-Sharing, Consent and Exploitation: Examining Donors’ and Recipients’ Circumstances and Retrospective Reflections.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 24 (7): 698–708. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, E., and B. Gough. 2016. “Searching for Help Online: An Analysis of Peer-to-Peer Posts on a Male-Only Infertility Forum.” Journal of Health Psychology 23 (7): 917–928. doi:10.1177/1359105316644038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, E., B. Gough, and N. Hudson. 2018. “Fit to Father? Online Accounts of Lifestyle Changes and Help-Seeking on a Male Infertility Board.” Sociology of Health & Illness 40 (6): 937–953. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holwell, E., J. Keehn, C. Leu, M. V. Sauer, and R. Klitzman. 2014. “Egg Donation Brokers: An Analysis of Agency versus in Vitro Fertilization Clinic Websites.” The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 59 (11-12): 534–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. 2004. Human Fertilsation and Embryology Authority Regulations: Disclosure of Information. London: H.M.S.O.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. 2017. Code of Practice. 8th Edition - Revised October 2017. London: H.M.S.O.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworska, S. 2018. “Bad’ Mums Tell the ‘Untellable’: Narrative Practices and Agency in Online Stories about Postnatal Depression on Mumsnet.” Discourse, Context and Media 25: 25–33. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2017.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. H. 2015. “Generic Intertextuality in Online Social Activism: The Case of the It Gets Better Project.” Language in Society 44 (3): 317–339. doi:10.1017/S0047404515000214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keehn, J., E. Holwell, R. Abdul-Karim, L. J. Chin, C. S. Leu, M. V. Sauer, and R. Klitzman. 2012. “Recruiting Egg Donors Online: An Analysis of in Vitro Fertilization Clinic and Agency Websites’ Adherence to American Society for Reproductive Medicine Guidelines.” Fertility and Sterility 98 (4): 995–1000. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keehn, J., E. Howell, M. Sauer, and R. Klitzman. 2015. “How Agencies Market Egg Donation on the Internet: A Qualitative Study.” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (3): 610–618. doi:10.1111/jlme.12303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, M. 2005. Nameless Relations: Anonymity, Melanesia and Reproductive Gift Exchange between British Ova Donors and Recipients. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kroløkke, C. 2015. “Have Eggs, Will Travel: The Experiences and Ethics of Global Egg Donation.” Somatechnics 5 (1): 12–31. doi:10.3366/soma.2015.0145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leve, M. 2013. “Reproductive Bodies and Bits: Exploring Dilemmas of Egg Donation under Neoliberalism.” Studies in Gender and Sexuality 14 (4): 277–288. doi:10.1080/15240657.2013.848319
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, J. 2018. Language, Gender and Parenthood Online. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315146805
   Google Scholar
• Malik, S. H., and N. S. Coulson. 2010. “Coping with Infertility Online: An Examination of Self-Help Mechanisms in an Online Infertility Support Group.” Patient Education and Counseling 81 (2): 315–318. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marre, D., B. San Román, and D. Guerra. 2018. “On Reproductive Work in Spain: Transnational Adoption, Egg Donation, Surrogacy.” Medical Anthropology 37 (2): 158–173. doi:10.1080/01459740.2017.1361947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musschenga, A. W. 2005. “Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5): 467–490. doi:10.1080/03605310500253030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahman, M. 2008. “Romanian Egg Sellers, ‘Dignity’ and Feminist Alliances in Transnational Ova Exchanges.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 15 (2): 65–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noack-Lundberg, K., P. Liamputtong, B. Marjadi, J. Ussher, J. Perz, V. Schmied, T. Dune, and E. Brook. 2019. “Sexual Violence and Safety: The Narratives of Transwomen in Online Forums.” Culture, Health & Sexuality. 1–14. doi:10.1080/13691058.2019.1627420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P. 2017. “Genetic Thinking and Everyday Living: On Family Practices and Family Imaginaries.” The Sociological Review 65 (4): 865–881. doi:10.1177/0038026117711645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orobitg, G., and C. Salazar. 2005. “The Gift of Motherhood: Egg Donation in a Barcelona Infertility Clinic.” Ethnos 70 (1): 31–52. doi:10.1080/00141840500048532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, R. E. 2013. Stories and Social Media. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pattinson, S. D. 2012. “The Value of Bodily Material: Acquiring and Allocating Human Gametes.” Medical Law Review 20 (4): 576–603. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fws005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, G. 2015. “Central Role of Altruism in the Recruitment of Gamete Donors.” Monash Bioethics Review 33 (1): 78–88. doi:10.1007/s40592-015-0019-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, G., J. De Mouzon, F. Shenfield, A. P. Ferraretti, T. Mardesic, A. Ruiz, and V. Goossens. 2014. “Socio-Demographic and Fertility-Related Characteristics and Motivations of Oocyte Donors in Eleven European Countries.” Human Reproduction 29 (5): 1076–1089. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, A. 2003. “Complicating Power in High-Tech Reproduction: Narratives of Anonymous Paid Egg Donors.” Journal of Medical Humanities 24 (3/4): 241–263.
   Google Scholar
• Provoost, V., J. Bernaerdt, H. Van Parys, A. Buysse, P. D. Sutter, and G. Pennings. 2018. “‘No Daddy’, ‘a Kind of Daddy’: Words Used by Donor Conceived Children and (Aspiring) Parents to Refer to the Sperm Donor.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 20 (4): 381–396. doi:10.1080/13691058.2017.1349180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purewal, S., and O. B. A. van den Akker. 2009. “Systematic Review of Oocyte Donation: Investigating Attitudes, Motivations and Experiences.” Human Reproduction Update 15 (5): 499–515. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravelingien, A., V. Provoost, and G. Pennings. 2016. “Creating a Family through Connection Websites and Events: Ethical and Social Issues.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 33 (4): 522–528. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, M., G. Pennings, and J. B. Appleby. 2012. Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Saumet, J., A. Petropanagos, K. Buzaglo, E. McMahon, G. Warraich, and N. Mahutte. 2018. “No. 356-Egg Freezing for Age-Related Fertility Decline.” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 40 (3): 356–368. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2017.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale, C., J. Charteris-Black, A. MacFarlane, and A. McPherson. 2010. “Interviews and Internet Forums: A Comparison of Two Sources of Qualitative Data.” Qualitative Health Research 20 (5): 595–606. doi:10.1177/1049732309354094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. 2008. “Rethinking Reproductive Gifts as Body Projects.” Sociology 42 (1): 11–28. doi:10.1177/0038038507084823
   Google Scholar
• Stommel, W., and T. Koole. 2010. “The Online Support Group as a Community: A Micro-Analysis of the Interaction with a New Member.” Discourse Studies 12 (3): 357–378. doi:10.1177/1461445609358518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugarman, J., and D. P. Sulmasy. 2001. Methods in Medical Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toscano, S. E., and R. M. Montgomery. 2009. “The Lived Experience of Women Pregnant (Including Preconception) Post in Vitro Fertilization through the Lens of Virtual Communities.” Health Care for Women International 30 (11): 1014–1036. doi:10.1080/07399330903159700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trounson, A., C. Wood, and J. Leeton. 1983. “Pregnancy in an Infertile Patient after Transfer of an Embryo Fertilised in Vitro.” BMJ 286 (6374): 1351–1352. doi:10.1136/bmj.286.6374.1351-a
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Hoof, W., V. Provoost, and G. Pennings. 2013. “Reflections of Dutch Patients on IVF Treatment in Belgium: A Qualitative Analysis of Internet Forums.” Human Reproduction 28 (4): 1013–1022. doi:10.1093/humrep/des461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldby, C., and R. Mitchell. 2006. Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, M., and S. M. Dorman. 2001. “Receiving Social Support Online: Implications for Health Education.” Health Education Research 16 (6): 693–707. doi:10.1093/her/16.6.693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 2000. “Interpretivism and Generalisation.” Sociology 34 (2): 209–224. doi:10.1177/S0038038500000146
   Google Scholar