Everyday Surveillance: Personal data and social classifications

REFERENCES

• Bennett, C. (1992) Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. and Star, S. L. (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (2000) The Social Life of Information, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford and Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1998) 'Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society', British Journal of Sociology, 51(1): 5-24.
   Google Scholar
• Dandeker, C. (1990) Surveillance, Power, and Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1986) 'Postscript on the societies of control', October, 59: 3-7.
   Google Scholar
• Ericson, R. V. and Haggerty, K. (1997) Policing the Risk Society, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flaherty, D. (1989) Protecting Privacy in Surveillance Societies, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gandy, O. H. (1993) The Panoptic Sort: A Political Economy of Personal Information, Boulder CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Gandy, O. H. (1995) 'It's discrimination, stupid!' In J. Brook and I. A. Boal (eds) Resisting the Virtual Life: The Culture and Politics of Information, San Francisco: City Lights, pp. 35-47.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. and Marvin, S. (2001) Splintering Urbanisai: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition, London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1990) The Taming of Chance, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty, K. and Ericson, R. V. (2000) The surveillant assemblage', British journal of Sociology, 51(4): 605-22.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (2000) 'Categorization: Identity, social process, and epistemology', Current Sociology, 48(3): 7-25.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (1999) Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (1994) The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society, Cambridge: Polity Press; Maiden MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (1997) 'Cyberspace sociality: Controversies over computer-mediated communication', in B. Loader (ed.) The Governance of Cyberspace, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 23-37.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (2001a) 'Surveillance after September 11 2001, Sociological Research Online, 6(3). Available online: www.socresonline.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (2001b) Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life, Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (2001c) 'Facing the future: Seeking ethics for everyday surveillance', Information Technology and Ethics, pp. 171-81.
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, C. (1988) When Old Technologies were New, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1996) Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D. (1995) 'Forms of intrusion: comparing resistance to information technology and biotechnology in America', in M. Bauer (ed.) Resistance to New Technology, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The New York Times (2000) One consulting firm finds voter data is hot property', The New York Times, 9 September.
   Google Scholar
• Nock, S. L. (1993) The Costs of Privacy: Surveillance and Reputation in America, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Nor ris, C, and Armstrong, G. (1999) The Maximum Surveillance Society: The Rise of CCTV, London: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, P. (1995) Legislating Privacy: Technology, Surveillance, and Public Policy, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Refraining Political Thought, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rule, J. (1973) Private Lives, Public Surveillance, Harmondsworth: Alien-Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Slevin, J. (2000) The Internet and Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staples, W. G. (2000) Everyday Surveillance: Vigilance and Visibility in Postmodem Life, Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Stellin, S. (2000) 'Dot-corn liquidations put consumer data in limbo', The New York Times, 4 December.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1996) The Retient of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (1994) Do categories have politics? The language/interaction perspective reconsidered, Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 2: 177-90.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. (1995) The Media and Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torpey, J. (2000) The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship, and the State, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, S. (1999) 'Police double crime "hot-spot" targets', The Toronto Star, 23 July.
   Google Scholar
• Washington Post (2000) 'Internet users seek assurances over on-line use of personal data', Washington Post, 20 August. Available online: http:// washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60984-2000Aug20.html>
   Google Scholar
• Virilio, P. (1991) The overexposed city, in Lost Dimension, New York: Semiotext (e), pp. 9-27.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, L. and Harper, T. (2001) Ottawa to boost terror laws', The Toronto Star, 23 November.
   Google Scholar