OMGs! Offline-based movement organizations, online-based movement organizations and network mobilization: a case study of political bloggers in Singapore

References

• Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog. Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data. Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discover, Chicago, IL, pp. 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Attorney-General's Chambers. (2004). Societies Act Chapter 311. Retrieved March 20, 2012 from http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;ident=91b3e4b7–079a-4d39-ae76–344e3cf9da86;query=CapAct%3A311%20Type%3Auact,areved;rec=2;resUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fstatutes.agc.gov.sg%2Faol%2Fsearch%2Fsummary%2Fresults.w3p%3Bquery%3DCapAct%253A311%2520Type%253Auact,areved
   Google Scholar
• Ayers, M. D. (2003). Comparing collective identity in online and offline feminist activists. In M. McCaughey & M. D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp. 145–164). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. (2003). Communicating global activism: Strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics. Information, Communication & Society, 6(2), 143–168. doi: 10.1080/1369118032000093860a
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Toft, A. (2009). Identity, technology, and narratives. Transnational activism and social networks. In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Internet politics (pp. 246–260). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, J., & Mulligan, D. K. (2003). Digital grassroots: Issue advocacy in the age of the Internet. In D. M. Anderson & M. C. Johnson (Eds.), The civic web: Online politics and democratic values (pp. 77–96). Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Biddix, P. J., & Park, H. W. (2008). Online networks of student protest: The case of the living wage campaign. New Media & Society, 10(6), 871–891. doi: 10.1177/1461444808096249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch, T. (2010). Digital journalism and online public spheres in South Africa. Communicatio, 36(2), 265–275. doi: 10.1080/02500167.2010.485374
   Google Scholar
• Buechler, S. M. (1993). Beyond resource mobilization? Emerging trends in social movement theory. Sociological Quarterly, 34(2), 217–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechler, S. M. (1995). New social movement theories. Sociological Quarterly, 36(3), 441–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1995.tb00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceren, O. (2006, June). Oppositional politics: Activism and the structure of the blogosphere. Paper presented at International Communication Association conference, Dresden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2004). Grounded theory. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Approach to qualitative research: A reader in theory and practice (pp. 496–521). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chia, S.-A. (2008, August 19). Political videos on Net for next GE. The Straits Times, p. A4.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2008, November). Mixing friends with politics: A functional analysis of ‘08 presidential candidates social networking profiles. Paper presented at National Communication Association conference, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements: An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, M. (2000). Social movement networks virtual and real. Information, Communication & Society, 3(3), 386–401. doi: 10.1080/13691180051033333
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, M., & Roscigno, V. J. (2003). Status, networks, and social movement participation: The case of striking workers. American Journal of Sociology, 108(6), 1292–1327. doi: 10.1086/375198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echchaibi, N. (2009). From the margins to the center: New media and the case of Bondy Blog in France. In A. Russell & N. Echchaibi (Eds.), International blogging (pp. 11–28). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., Stohl, C., & Bimber, B. (2006). Modeling the structure of collective action. Communication Monographs, 73(1), 29–54. doi: 10.1080/03637750600557099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzen, S. A. (2007). Discipline and democratize: Patterns of bureaucratic accountability in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Public Administration, 30, 1435–1457. doi: 10.1080/01900690701229590
   Google Scholar
• George, C. (2003). The Internet and the narrowing tailoring dilemma for ‘Asian’ democracies. The Communication Review, 6, 247–268. doi: 10.1080/10714420390226270.002
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zuniga, H., Puig-I-Abril, E., & Rojas, H. (2009). Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the Internet is changing the political environment. New Media & Society, 11(4), 553–574. doi: 10.1177/1461444809102960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zuniga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D. (2010). Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7, 36–51. doi: 10.1080/19331680903316742
   Google Scholar
• Gould, R. V. (1991). Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris commune, 1871. American Sociological Review, 56(6), 716–729. doi: 10.2307/2096251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannigan, J. A. (1985). Alain Touraine, Manuel Castells and social movement theory: A critical appraisal. Sociological Quarterly, 26(4), 435–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1985.tb00237.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Strong, weak and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society, 18(5), 385–401. doi: 10.1080/01972240290108195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, K. C., Baber, Z., & Khondker, H. (2002). ‘Sites’ of resistance: Alternative web sites and state-society relations. British Journal of Sociology, 53(1), 127–148. doi: 10.1080/00071310120109366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C., & Park, H. W. (2011). Sociology of hyperlink networks of Web 1.0, Web 2.0, and Twitter: A case study of South Korea. In C. Soon, J. Burgess, A. Bruns, & H. W. Park (Eds.), Mapping networks of political communication online: A study of six countries. Social Science and Computer Review, 29(3), 354–368.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C.-L, Park, S. J., & Park, H. W. (2013). Political discourse among key Twitter users: The case of Sejong city in South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia. Retrieved from http://eastasia.yu.ac.kr/documents/Hsu.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore. (2009). Infocomm usage – Households and individuals for 2008. Retrieved from http://www.ida.gov.sg/doc/Publications/Publications_Level3/20090218183328/HH2008_Mgt_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, C. J. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 527–553. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.002523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583–600. doi: 10.2307/2095417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Langman, L. (2005). From virtual public spheres to global justice: A critical theory of internetworked social movements. Sociological Theory, 23(1), 42–74. doi: 10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00242.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J., Halavais, A., & Zhang, B. (2007). The blog network in America: Blogs as indicators of relationships among US cities. Connections, 27(2), 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Locher, D. A. (2002). Collective behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 231–247.
   Google Scholar
• Mamadouh, V. (2004). Internet, scale and the global grassroots: Geographies of the Indymedia network of independent media centres. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 95(5), 482–497. doi: 10.1111/j.0040-747X.2004.00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of Freedom Summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 64–90. doi: 10.1086/228463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., & Paulsen, R. (1993). Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 640–67. doi: 10.1086/230319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1973). The trend of social movements. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241. doi: 10.1086/226464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nah, S., Veenstra, A. S., & Shah, D. V. (2006). The Internet and anti-war activism: A case of information, expression, and action. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 230–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00323.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Publics goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1968). The logic of collective action. New York, NY: Schocken.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, M. (1989). The sit-in movement of 1960. Brooklyn, NY: Carlson.
   Google Scholar
• Pfaff, S. (1996). Collective identity and informal groups in revolutionary mobilization: East Germany in 1989. Social Forces, 75(1), 91–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Registry of Societies. (2011) FAQs. Retrieved March 20, 2012 from http://www.ifaq.gov.sg/mha/apps/fcd_faqmain.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Rodan, G. (1998). The internet and political control in Singapore. Political Science Quarterly, 113(1), 63–89. doi: 10.2307/2657651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodan, G. (2003). Special issue on electronic media, markets and civil society in East and Southeast Asia: Introduction. The Pacific Review, 16(4), 455–464. doi: 10.1080/0951274032000132209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, A. (2005, May). Global communication, new media, and network resistance: A case study. Paper presented at International Communication Association conference, New York City, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Press Holdings. (2010). The Straits Times Media Kit 2010. Retrieved December 23, 2010, from http://www.sph.com.sg/pdf/MediaKit2010/ST%202010%20Media%20Kit%20(27%20Jan%2010).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Zurcher, L. A. J., & Ekland-Olson, S. (1980). Approach to differential recruitment. American Sociological Review, 45(5), 787–801. doi: 10.2307/2094895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soon, C., & Cho, H. (2011). Flows of relations and communication among Singapore political bloggers and organizations: The networked public sphere approach. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 8, 93–109. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2010.514538
   Google Scholar
• Soon, C., & Kluver, R. (in press). Uniting political bloggers in diversity: Collective identity and web activism. Journal of Computer-Mediated-Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, L. (2007, May). National social movement organizations and the World Wide Web: A survey of web-based activities and attributes. Presented at International Communication Association conference, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 19–45.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, W. (2008, August 9). Rise of online activists. The Straits Times, p. B11.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. L. (2009). Using social media to reach young people. Nieman Reports (Spring), 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements, 1768–2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tindall, D. B. (2002). Social networks, identification and participation in an environmental movement: Low-medium cost activism within the British Columbia wilderness preservation movement. CRSA/RCSA, 39(4), 413–452.
   Google Scholar
• Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1146–1171. doi: 10.1080/13691181003628307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vegh, S. (2003). Classifying forms of online activism – the case of cyberprotest against the World Bank. In M. McCaughey & M. D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp. 71–95). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don't ride alone. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (167–194). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2011). Global Information Technology Report Ranking (GITR). Retrieved March 28, 2012 from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GITR_Report_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar