3,836
Views
68
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Political activism online: organization and media relations in the case of 15M in Spain

&
Pages 858-871 | Received 14 Nov 2012, Accepted 26 Jul 2013, Published online: 27 Aug 2013

References

  • Anduiza, E., Cantijoch, M., & Gallego, A. (2009). Political participation and the internet: A field essay. Information Communication & Society, 12(6), 860–878. doi: 10.1080/13691180802282720
  • Anduiza, E., Gallego, A., & Cantijoch, M. (2010). Online political participation in Spain: The impact of traditional and internet resources. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 7(4), 356–368. doi: 10.1080/19331681003791891
  • Bakardjieva, M. (2012). Reconfiguring the mediapolis: New media and civic agency. New Media & Society, 14(1), 63–79. doi: 10.1177/1461444811410398
  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
  • Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boczkowski, P. J. (2010). News at work: Imitation in an age of information abundance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Breindl, Y. (2012). The dynamics of participation and organisation in European digital rights campaigning. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 4(1), 24–44.
  • Casero-Ripollés, A. (2010). ¿El despertar del público?: Comunicación política, ciudadanía y web 2.0 [Waking the public?: Political communication, citizenship and Web 2.0]. In M. Martin Vicente & D. Rothberg (Eds.), Meios de comunicaçao e cidadania (pp. 107–122). Sao Paulo: Cultura Académica.
  • Casero-Ripollés, A., & Feenstra, R. A. (2012). The 15-M movement and the new media: A case study of how new themes were introduced into Spanish political discourse. Media International Australia (MIA), 144, 68–76.
  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Chadwick, A. (2007). Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity. Political Communication, 24(3), 283–301. doi: 10.1080/10584600701471666
  • Chadwick, A. (2011). The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: The British prime minister and the “bullygate” affair. International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(1), 3–29. doi: 10.1177/1940161210384730
  • Christensen, H. (2011). Political activities on the internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means? First Monday, 16(2). Retrieved from http://uncommonculture.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3336/2767 doi: 10.5210/fm.v16i2.3336
  • Davis, A. (2010). Political communication and social theory. London: Routledge.
  • Diani, M. (2000). Social movement networks virtual and real. Information, Communication & Society, 3(3), 386–401. doi: 10.1080/13691180051033333
  • Downing, J. (2001). Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. London: Sage.
  • Earl, J. (2010). The dynamics of protest-related diffusion on the web. Information, Communication & Society, 13(2), 209–225. doi: 10.1080/13691180902934170
  • Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change. Activism in the internet age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Eltantawy, N., & Wiest, J. (2011). Social media in the Egyptian revolution: Reconsidering resource mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1207–1224.
  • Fenton, N. (2009). New media, old news: Journalism and democracy in the digital age. London: Sage.
  • Fuchs, C. (2012). Some reflections on Manuel Castells’ book “Networks of outrage and hope. Social movements in the internet age”. tripleC: Cognition, Communication, Co-operation, 10(2), 775–797.
  • Gamson, W. A., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 114–125. doi: 10.1177/0002716293528001009
  • Garcelon, M. (2006). The ‘Indymedia’ experiment: The internet as movement facilitator against institutional control. Convergence, 12(1), 55–82.
  • Garrett, R. K. (2006). Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information Communication & Society, 9(2), 202–224. doi: 10.1080/13691180600630773
  • Gitlin, T. (2003). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Gladwell, M. (2010, October 4). Small change. Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker, 42–49.
  • González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Moreno, Y. (2013). Broadcasters and hidden influentials in online protest diffusion. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 943–965. doi: 10.1177/0002764213479371
  • Harlow, S. (2012). Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline. New Media & Society, 14(2), 225–243. doi: 10.1177/1461444811410408
  • Haro-Barba, C., & Sampedro, V. (2011). Activismo politico en red: Del Movimiento por la vivienda digna al 15M [Political activism in Internet: From the movement for housing up to the 15M]. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 8(2), 167–185.
  • Harp, D., Bahcmann, I., & Guo, L. (2012). The whole online world is watching: Profiling social networking sites and activists in China, Latin America, and the United States. International Journal of Communication, 6, 298–321.
  • Heinrich, A. (2011). Network journalism: Journalistic practice in interactive spheres. London: Routledge.
  • Hessel, S. (2010). Indignez-vous! Paris: Indigène.
  • Howard, P. N., Agarwal, S. D., & Hussain, M. M. (2011). When do states disconnect their digital networks? Regime responses to the political uses of social media. The Communication Review, 14(3), 216–232. doi: 10.1080/10714421.2011.597254
  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: NYU Press.
  • Keane, J. (2009). The life and death of democracy. London: Simon & Schuster.
  • van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information Communication & Society, 13(8), 1146–1171. doi: 10.1080/13691181003628307
  • Lafuente-Pérez, P., & Zugasti-Azagra, R. (2012). La irrupción del 15M: la cobertura en El País y en El Mundo [The emergence of 15M: Coverage in El País and El Mundo]. In A. Casero-Ripolles (Ed.), Periodismo político en España: concepciones, tensiones y elecciones (pp. 119–132). Tenerife: SLCS. Retrieved from http://www.revistalatinacs.org/067/cuadernos/33_CAL_interior.pdf
  • Lievrouw, L. (2011). Alternative and activist new media. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 231–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01628.x
  • Loader, B. D., & Mercea, D. (2011). Networking democracy? Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 757–769. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.592648
  • Lomicky, C. S., & Hogg, N. M. (2010). Computer-mediated communication and protest: An examination of social movement activities at Gallaudet, a university for the deaf. Information Communication & Society, 13(5), 674–695. doi: 10.1080/13691180903214515
  • McNair, B. (2006). Cultural chaos: Journalism, news and power in a globalised world. London: Routledge.
  • Mercea, D. (2012). Digital prefigurative participation: The entwinement of online communication and offline participation in protest events. New Media and Society, 14(1), 153–169. doi: 10.1177/1461444811429103
  • Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity.
  • della Porta, D. (2011). Communication in movement: Social movements as agents of participatory democracy. Information Communication & Society, 14(6), 800–819.
  • Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rucht, D. (2004). The quadruple “A”: Media stategies of protest movements since the 1960s. In W. van de Donk, B. Loader, P. Nixon, & D. Rucht (Eds.), Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements (pp. 29–54). London: Routledge.
  • Sampedro, V., & Sánchez-Duarte, J. M. (2011). La red era la plaza [The network was the square]. In V. Sampedro (Ed.), Cibercampaña. cauces y diques para la participación. las elecciones generales de 2008 y su proyección tecnopolítica (pp. 237–242). Madrid: UCM.
  • Silverstone, R. (2007). Media and morality: On the rise of the mediapolis. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Theocharis, Y. (2012). Cuts, tweets, solidarity and mobilisation: How the internet shaped the student occupations. Parliamentary Affairs, 65(1), 162–194. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsr049
  • Torcal, M., Teorell, J., & Montero, J. R. (2006). Political participation: Mapping the terrain. In J. van Deth, A. Westholm, & J. R. Montero (Eds.), Citizenship, involvement in European democracies. A comparative analysis (pp. 334–357). London: Routledge.
  • Tufekci, Z. (2013). “Not this one”: Social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 848–870. doi: 10.1177/0002764213479369
  • Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 299–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x
  • Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2002). New media, new movements? The role of the internet in shaping the ‘anti-globalization’ movement. Information, Communication & Society, 5(4), 465–493. doi: 10.1080/13691180208538801
  • Vegh, S. (2003). Classifying forms of online activism: The case of cyberprotests against the World Bank. In M. McCaughey & M. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp. 71–95). London: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.