3,881
Views
81
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Facing an uncertain reception: young citizens and political interaction on Facebook

Pages 203-216 | Received 24 Oct 2013, Accepted 29 Oct 2013, Published online: 09 Dec 2013

References

  • Bakardjieva, M. (2009). Subactivism: Lifeworld and politics in the age of the Internet. The Information Society, 25(2), 91–104. doi: 10.1080/01972240802701627 doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01509.x
  • Baumgartner, J. C., & Morris, J. S. (2010). MyFaceTube politics: Social networking web sites and political engagement among young adults. Social Science Computer Review, 28, 24–44. doi: 10.1177/0894439309334325
  • Bennett, W. L. (1998). The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. PS: Political Science & Politics, 31(4), 741–761.
  • Binder, J., Howes, A., & Sutcliffe, A. (2009, April). The problem of conflicting social spheres: Effects of network structure on experienced tension in social network sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 965–974). Boston, MA: ACM.
  • boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Routledge. doi: 10.1007/s11109-006-9008-3
  • Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680–700.
  • Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1177/0270467610385893
  • Das, S., & Kramer, A. (2013). Self-censorship on Facebook. Association for the advancement of artificial intelligence, seventh international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, Boston, MA.
  • Edgerly, S., Thorson, K., Bighash, L., Gee, E., & Hannah, M. (2013). Posting about politics: Media as resources for debating the debates on Facebook. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (Communication Technology), Washington, DC.
  • Ekström, M., & Östman, J. (2013). Information, interaction, and creative production: The effects of three forms of Internet use on youth democratic engagement. Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650213476295 (ahead of print).
  • Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Eliasoph, N., & Lichterman, P. (2003). Culture in interaction. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 735–794. doi: 10.1086/367920
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2010). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892. doi: 10.1177/1461444810385389
  • Gil de Zuniga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media user for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement, and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
  • Hayes, A. F., Scheufele, D. A., & Huge, M. E. (2006). Nonparticipation as self-censorship: Publicly observable political activity in a polarized opinion climate. Political Behavior, 28(3), 259–283.
  • Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 377–386.
  • Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., Lee, N. J., & Feezell, J. T. (2012). Youth online activity and exposure to diverse perspectives. New Media & Society, 14(3), 492–512. doi: 10.1177/1461444811420271 doi: 10.1177/0002716212453264
  • Kahne, J., & Westheimer, J. (2006). The limits of political efficacy: Educating citizens for a democratic society. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(02), 289–296.
  • Kaufman, L. (2013, October 13). Viral content with a liberal bent. New York Times, p. B1. Retrieved October 15, from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/14/business/media/upworthys-viral-content-with-a-liberal-bent-is-taking-off.html?src=rechp&_r=0
  • Kim, J., & Kim, E. J. (2008). Theorizing dialogic deliberation: Everyday political talk as communicative action and dialogue. Communication Theory, 18(1), 51–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00313.x
  • Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x
  • Litt, E. (2012). Knock, knock. Who's there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 330–345. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2012.705195
  • Lohr, S. (2012, February 11). The age of big data. New York Times, p. SR1. Retreived September 15, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/sunday-review/big-datas-impact-in-the-world.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
  • Mansbridge, J. J. (1983). Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi: 10.1177/1461444810365313
  • McLaughlin, C., & Vitak, J. (2012). Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(2), 299–315. doi: 10.1177/1461444811412712
  • Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nocera, J. (2013). Facebook's new rules. Retrieved October 18, from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/19/opinion/nocera-facebooks-new-rules.html
  • Rainie, L., Smith, A., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Verba, S. (2012). Social media and political engagement. Pew Research Center‘s Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved February 15, 2013, from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Political-engagement.aspx
  • Rui, J. R., & Stefanone, M. A. (2013). Strategic image management online: Self-presentation, self-esteem and social network perspectives. Information, Communication & Society, 16(8), 1286–1305.
  • Thorson, K. (2012). What does it mean to be a good citizen? Citizenship vocabularies as resources for action. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 70–85.
  • Thorson, K., Vraga, E., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (in press). Don't push your opinions on me: Young citizens and political etiquette on Facebook. In Presidential Campaigning and Social Media. Oxford University Press.
  • Vraga, E. K., Thorson, K., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Gee, E. (2013). Personalities, perceptions and “drama”: How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Warren, M. E. (1996). What should we expect from more democracy? Radically democratic responses to politics. Political Theory, 24(2), 241–270. doi: 10.1177/0090591796024002004
  • West, A., Lewis, J., & Currie, P. (2009). Students’ Facebook ‘friends’: Public and private spheres. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(6), 615–627. doi: 10.1080/13676260902960752
  • Wojcieszak, M., & Rojas, H. (2011). Correlates of party, ideology and issue based extremity in an era of egocentric publics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 488–507. doi: 10.1177/1940161211418226
  • Wojcieszak, M. E., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.