Organization in the crowd: peer production in large-scale networked protests

References

• Agarwal, S., Bennett, W. L., Johnson, C., & Walker, S. (forthcoming). A model of crowd-enabled organization: Theory and methods for understanding the role of Twitter in the Occupy protests.
   Google Scholar
• Ancelovici, M. (2012). Making sense of the Spanish Indignados. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Council for European Studies, Omni Parker House Hotel, Boston, MA, not available. August 2013. Retrieved from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p547131_index.html
   Google Scholar
• Anduiza, E., Cristancho, C., & Sabucedo, J. (2013). Mobilization through online social networks: The political protest of the Indignados in Spain. Information, Communication & Society. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.808360
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2008). Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control. Journal of the American Information Science and Technology, 59, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai-Nahon, K., Hemsley, J., Walker, S., & Hussain, M. (2011). Fifteen minutes of fame: The place of blogs in the life cycle of viral political information. Policy & Internet, 3(1), 1–28. Article 2.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, G., & Shah, C. (2011). Circulating struggle: The on-line flow of environmental advocacy clips from the daily show and the colbert report. Information Communication & Society, 14(7), 1017–1038. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.554573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y., Roberts, H., Faris, R., Solow-Niederman, & Etling, B. (2013). Social mobilization and the networked public sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA debate. The Berkman Center for Internet & Society Research Publication Series: Retrieved November 5, 2013, from http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications/2013/social_mobilization_and_the_networked_public_sphere
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. (2003). Communicating global activism: Strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics. Information, Communication & Society, 6(2), 143–168. doi: 10.1080/1369118032000093860a
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals, 644, 20–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M. S., Monroy-Hernández, A., Harry, D., André, P., Panovich, K., & Vargas, G. (2011). 4chan and /b/: An analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. In Proceedings of AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM) (pp. 50–57). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C. (2012). Collective action in organizations: Interaction and engagement in an era of technological change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borch, C. (2012). The politics of crowds: An alternative history of sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. Presented at HICSS-43, IEEE, Kauai, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, wikipedia, second life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2011, August 25–27). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Reykjavik.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, B., Joyce, E., & Pike, J. (2008). Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: The nature and roles of policies and rules in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) (pp. 1101–1110). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Calderaro, A. (2011, August 26). New political struggles in the network society: The case of the free and open source (FOSS) Movement. Paper presented at the European Consortium of Political Research (ECPR) General Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crowston, K., Wei, L., Howison, J., & Wiggins, A. (2012). Free/libre open-source software development: What we know and what we do not know. ACM Computing Surveys, 44(2), Article 7. doi: 10.1145/2089125.2089127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Alfaro, L., Kulshreshtha, A., Pye, I., & Adler, B. T. (2011). Reputation systems for open collaboration. Communications of the ACM, 54(8), 81–87. doi: 10.1145/1978542.1978560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sanctis, G., & Monge, P. (1999). Introduction to the special issue: communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10(6), 693–703. doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.6.693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diani, M. (2011). Social movements and collective action. In J. Scott & P. Carrington (Eds.), The sage handbook of social network analysis (pp. 223–235). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Donath, J., & boyd, d. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71–82. doi: 10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, K., & Walker, S. (2013). Working within a black box: Transparency in the production of Big Twitter Data. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, J., Walker, S., Hemsley, J., Nahone, K., & Mason, R. (2013). ‘Opening the black box of social media research methods: SoMe Ways Forward’. Retrieved November 23, 2013, from http://somelab.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/HICSS_workshop_final29Dec.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Y., & Neufeld, D. (2009). Understanding sustained participation in open source software projects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(4), 9–50. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222250401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forte, A., & Lampe, C. (2013). Defining, understanding and supporting open collaboration: Lessons from the literature. American Behavioral Scientist. doi:10.1177/0002764212469362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forte, A., Larco, V., & Bruckman, A. (2009). Decentralization in wikipedia governance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 49–72. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222260103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaby, S., & Caren, N. (2012). Occupy online: How cute old men and Malcolm X recruited 400,000 US users to OWS on facebook. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 367–374. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2012.708858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. (2010, October 4). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted, New Yorker. Retrieved August 19, 2013, from http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwell
   Google Scholar
• González-Bailón, S. (2013). Online social networks and bottom-up politics, Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2246663
   Google Scholar
• González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Moreno, Y. (2013). Broadcasters and hidden influentials in online protest diffusion. American Behavioral Scientist. doi:10.1177/0002764213479371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkinson, J. (2012, April 13). How occupy co-opted moveon.org. Mother Jones. Retrieved from http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/04/99-spring-moveon-occupy-wall-street
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2009, January 5–8). Crowds and communities: Light and heavyweight models of peer production. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley, J. (2011, December 9). Beginning to map social networks. Social Media Lab @ UW. Retrieved August 23, 2013, from http://somelab.net/2011/12/social-networks/
   Google Scholar
• Hill, B. M., & Monroy-Hernández, A. (2013). The cost of collaboration for code and art: Evidence from a remixing community. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Antonio, TX, ACM 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, B. M., Shaw, A., & Benkler, Y. (n.d.). Status, social signaling and collective action in a peer production community. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Digital Media and Learning Initiative. Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., & Bang, H. (2013). Occupy wall street: A new political form of movement and community? Journal of Information Technology and Politics. doi:10.1080/19331681.2013.803948
   Google Scholar
• Juris, J. (2005). The new digital media and activist networking within anti-corporate globalization movements. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597, 189–208. doi: 10.1177/0002716204270338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. D. (2011, February 9). Wired and shrewd, Young Egyptians Guide Revolt. New York Times. Retrieved August 14, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/10/world/middleeast/10youth.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Kittur, A., & Kraut, R. (2008). Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: Quality through coordination. Human-Computer Interaction Institute, Paper 99. Retrieved from http://repository.cmu.edu/hcii/99
   Google Scholar
• Kittur, A., Pendleton, B., & Kraut, R. E. (2009). Herding the cats: The influence of groups in coordinating peer production. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kriplean, T., Beschastnikh, I., & McDonald, D. W. (2008). Articulations of wikiwork: Uncovering valued work in Wikipedia through barnstars. In Proceedings of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (pp. 47–56). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Intl. WWW Conference, Raleigh, NC, ACM, 591–600. doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751
   Google Scholar
• Lampe, C., Johnston, E., & Resnick, P. (2007). Follow the reader: Filtering comments on Slashdot. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1253–1262). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Lampe, C., & Resnick, P. (2004, April 24–29). Slash(dot) and burn: Distributed moderation in a large online conversation space. CHI 2004, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Lievrouw, L. (2011). Alternative and activist new media. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, S., & Walter-Dropp, G. (Eds.). (2014). Bits and atoms: Information and communication technology in areas of limited statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luther, K., Fiesler, C., & Bruckman, A. (2013). Redistributing leadership in online creative collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported CooperativeWork (CSCW 2013), San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Margetts, H., John, P., Escher, T., & Reissfelder, S. (2012). Social information and political participation on the internet: An experiment. European Political Science Review, 3(3), 321–344. doi: 10.1017/S1755773911000129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. S. (1989). The crowd and the mob: From Plato to Canetti. London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• McPhail, C. (1991). The myth of the madding crowd. New York: A. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166. doi: 10.1177/1940161212474472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morell, M. F. (2012). The free culture and 15M movements in Spain: Composition, social networks and synergies. Social Movement Studies, 11(3), 386–392. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2012.710323
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, M. (2010). Networks and states: The global politics of Internet governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy, D. (2013). Twitter: Social communication in the Twitter age. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pavan, E. (2012). Frames and connections in the governance of global communications: A network study of the internet governance forum. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Penney, J., & Dadas, C. (2013). (Re)tweeting in the service of protest. Digital composition and circulation in the Occupy Wall Street movement. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444813479593
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D. (2005). Multiple belongings, flexible identities, and the construction of ‘another politics’: Between the European Social Forum and local social fora. In D. della Porta & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Transnational protest and global activism (pp. 175–202). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Postill, J. (2013). The uneven convergence of digital freedom activism and popular protest: A global theory of the new protest movements. Melbourne: RMIT University. Retrieved October 7, 2013, from: http://rmit.academia.edu/JohnPostill
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In B. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 295–336). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reagle, J. (2007). Do as I do: Authorial leadership in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Wikis (pp. 143–156). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Schweik, C., & English, R. (2007). Tragedy of the FOSS commons? Investigating the institutional designs of free/libre and open source software projects, First Monday, [S.l.], feb. 2007. ISSN 13960466. Retrieved August 23, 2013, from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1619/1534. doi:10.5210/fm.v12i2.1619
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, A. (2012). Centralized and decentralized gatekeeping in an open online collective. Politics & Society, 40(3), 349–388. doi: 10.1177/0032329212449009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2012). (How) will the revolution be retweeted? Information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian Uprising. CSCW 2012. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., & Chi, E. H. (2010). ‘Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter networks’. In IEEE Intl Conference on Social Computing (pp. 177–184), IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., Driscoll, K., Ekdale, B., Edgerly, S., Gamber Thompson, L., Schrock, A., … Wells, C. (2013). YouTube, Twitter and the Occupy movement: Connecting content and circulation practices. Information, Communication & Society, doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.756051
   Google Scholar
• Tremayne, M. (2013). Anatomy of protest in the digital era: A network analysis of Twitter and Occupy Wall Street. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest. doi:10.1080/14742837.2013.830969
   Google Scholar
• Turner, F. (2009). Burning Man at Google: A cultural infrastructure for new media production. New Media & Society, 11(1&2), 73–94. doi: 10.1177/1461444808099575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasi, I. B., & Suh, C. S. (2013). Protest in the internet age: Public attention, social media, and the spread of ‘Occupy’ protests in the United States. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved November 24, 2013, from http://politicsandprotest.ws.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/07/PPW-2-Vasi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weber, S. (2004). The success of open source. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welser, H. T., Cosley, D., Kossinets, G., Lin, A., Dokshin, F., Gay, G., & Smith, M. (2011). Finding social roles in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference (pp. 122–129). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, D. (2008). Strong regularities in online peer production. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 302–309). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., Kraut, R., & Kittur, A. (2012). Effectiveness of shared leadership in online communities. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 407–416). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar