2,259
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Bots, bespoke, code and the materiality of software platforms

Pages 342-356 | Received 06 Sep 2013, Accepted 03 Dec 2013, Published online: 03 Jan 2014

References

  • Barlow, J. (1996, February). A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Retrieved from http://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html
  • Baym, N. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Beaulieu, A. (2010). From co-location to co-presence: Shifts in the use of ethnography for the study of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 40(3), 453–470. doi: 10.1177/0306312709359219
  • Becker, H. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
  • Bespoke, adj. (2013). In Oxford English dictionary online. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/18156
  • Blanchette, J.-F. (2011). A material history of bits. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1042–1057. doi: 10.1002/asi.21542
  • Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Burrell, J. (2009). The fieldsite as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods, 21(2), 181–199. doi: 10.1177/1525822X08329699
  • Chun, W. H. K. (2004). On software, or the persistence of visual knowledge. Grey Room, 18, 26–51. Retrieved from http://www.brown.edu/Departments/MCM/people/chun/papers/software.pdf doi: 10.1162/1526381043320741
  • Crowston, K., & Howison, J. (2005). The social structure of free and open source software development. First Monday, 10(2), 1–21. doi: 10.5210/fm.v10i2.1207
  • Díaz, O., Arellano, C., & Iturrioz, J. (2008). Layman tuning of websites. In Proceedings of WWW 2008 (p. 1127). New York: ACM Press.
  • Dijck, José Van, & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14.
  • Donald, A. (2012). Throw off the cloak of invisibility. Nature, 490(7421), 447. doi: 10.1038/490447a
  • Elliott, C., & Brzezinski, J. (1998). Autonomous agents as synthetic characters. AI Magazine, 19(2), 13–18.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
  • Fiol, C. M., & O'Connor, E. J. (2005). Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organization Science, 16(1), 19–32. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0101
  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). “Good” organizational reasons for “bad” clinic records. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 186–207). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Geiger, R. S. (2009). The social roles of bots and assisted editing programs. In Proceedings of WikiSym 2009. New York: ACM Press.
  • Geiger, R. S. (2011). The lives of bots. In G. Lovink & N. Tkacz (Eds.), Wikipedia: A critical point of view (pp. 78–93). Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures. Retrieved from http://www.stuartgeiger.com/lives-of-bots-wikipedia-cpov.pdf
  • Geiger, R. S., & Halfaker, A. (2013). When the levee breaks: Without bots, what happens to Wikipedia's quality control processes? In Proceedings of WikiSym 2013. New York: ACM Press.
  • Geiger, R. S., Halfaker, A., Pinchuk, M., & Walling, S. (2012). Defense mechanism or socialization tactic? Improving Wikipedia's notifications to rejected contributors. In Proceedings of ICWSM 2012. New York: AAAI.
  • Geiger, R. S., & Ribes, D. (2010). The work of sustaining order in Wikipedia: The banning of a vandal. In Proceedings of CSCW 2010. New York: ACM Press.
  • Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of “platforms”. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342738
  • Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo Boczkowski, & Kirsten Foot (Eds.), Media technologies Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Retrieved from http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/media-technologies
  • Graham, M. (2012). Geography/Internet: Ethereal alternate dimensions of cyberspace or grounded augmented realities? The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 177–182. doi: 10.1111/geoj.12009
  • Halfaker, A., & Riedl, J. (2012). Bots and cyborgs: Wikipedia's immune system. Computer, 45(3), 79–82. doi: 10.1109/MC.2012.82
  • Hands, J. (2013). Introduction: Politics, power, and “platformativity”. Culture Machine, 14, 1–9.
  • Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: NYU Press.
  • Jurgenson, N. (2012). When atoms meet bits: Social media, the mobile web and augmented revolution. Future Internet, 4, 83–91. doi: 10.3390/fi4010083
  • Kazman, R., & Chen, H. -M. (2009). The metropolis model: A new logic for development of crowdsourced systems. Communications of the ACM, 52(7), 76–84. doi: 10.1145/1538788.1538808
  • Kelty, C. (2008). Two bits: The cultural significance of free software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Kirschenbaum, M. G. (2008). Mechanisms: New media and the forensic imagination. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Konieczny, P. (2009). Wikipedia: Community or social movement? Interface, 1(2), 212–232. Retrieved from http://interfacejournal.nuim.ie/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Interface-1-2-pp212-232-Konieczny.pdf
  • Lampe, C., & Resnick, P. (2004). Slash(dot) and burn: Distributed moderation in a large online conversation space. In Proceedings of CHI 2004 (pp. 543–550). New York: ACM Press.
  • Lanzara, G. F., & Patriotta, G. (2007). The institutionalization of knowledge in an automotive factory: Templates, inscriptions, and the problem of durability. Organization Studies, 28(5), 635–660. doi: 10.1177/0170840607068309
  • Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In J. Law & W. Bijker (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Lessig, L. (2006). Code 2.0. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Lindtner, S., & Li, D. (2012). Created in China: The makings of China's hackerspace community. Interactions, 19(6), 18–22. doi: 10.1145/2377783.2377789
  • Lundby, K. (2011). Patterns of belonging in online/offline interfaces of religion. Information, Communication & Society, 14(8), 1219–1235. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.594077
  • Mackenzie, A. (2005). The performativity of code: Software and cultures of circulation. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(1), 71–92. doi: 10.1177/0263276405048436
  • MacKenzie, D. (1996). Marx and the machine. In Knowing machines: Essays on technical change (pp. 23–48). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Mackenzie, D. (2006). An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Marx, K. (1973). The fragment on machines. In The grundrisse (pp. 690–712). London: Penguin.
  • Mathew, A., & Cheshire, C. (2010). The new cartographers: Trust and social order within the Internet infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 38th research conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1988216
  • Mockus, A., Fielding, R. T., & Herbsleb, J. D. (2002). Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 11(3), 309–346. doi: 10.1145/567793.567795
  • Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Müller-Birn, C., Dobusch, L., & Herbsleb, J. D. (2013). Work-to-rule: The emergence of algorithmic governance in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of Communities and Technologies 2013 (pp. 80–89). New York: ACM Press.
  • Niederer, S., & Van Dijck, J. (2010). Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media & Society, 12(8), 1368–1387. doi: 10.1177/1461444810365297
  • O'Leary, M. B., & Cummings, J. N. (2007). The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 433–452.
  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474. doi: 10.1080/19416520802211644
  • Phillips, L. B. (2013). The temple and the bazaar: Wikipedia as a platform for open authority in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 56(2), 219–235. doi: 10.1111/cura.12021
  • Poor, N. (2005). Mechanisms of an online public sphere: The website slashdot. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2).
  • Reagle, J. (2010). Good faith collaboration: The culture of Wikipedia. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Ribes, D., Jackson, S., Geiger, R. S., Burton, M., & Finholt, T. (2013). Artifacts that organize: Delegation in the distributed organization. Information and Organization, 23(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2012.08.001
  • Saxenian, A. (2006). The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy (p. 424). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Schindler, M., & Vrandecic, D. (2009). Introducing new features to Wikipedia – Case studies for web science. In Proceedings of web science 2009. Retrieved from http://journal.webscience.org/213/
  • Sengers, P. (1998). Do the thing right. In Proceedings of the second international conference on Autonomous agents – AGENTS ’98 (pp. 24–31). New York: ACM Press.
  • Sengers, P. (2000). Narrative intelligence. Human cognition and social agent technology. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Stallman, R. (2013, September). Why free software is more important now than ever before. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/09/why-free-software-is-more-important-now-than-ever-before/
  • Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391. doi: 10.1177/00027649921955326
  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
  • Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134. doi: 10.1287/isre.7.1.111
  • Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  • Takhteyev, Y. (2012). Coding places: Software practice in a South American city. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Thorson, K., Driscoll, K., Ekdale, B., Edgerly, S., Thompson, L. G., Schrock, A., … Wells, C. (2013). YouTube, Twitter, and the occupy movement. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 421–451. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.756051
  • Tkacz. (2013). Open sesame. Aeon. Retrieved from http://www.aeonmagazine.com/world-views/nathaniel-tkacz-open-source-government
  • Van Dijck, J., & Nieborg, D. (2009). Wikinomics and its discontents: A critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos. New Media & Society, 11(5), 855–874. doi: 10.1177/1461444809105356
  • Wattenberg, M., Viegas, F., & McKeon, M. (2007). The hidden order of Wikipedia. In Proceedings of OCSC 2007 (pp. 445–454).
  • Wilson, B. (2005). Rave and straightedge, the virtual and the real: Exploring online and offline experiences in Canadian youth subcultures. Youth & Society, 36(3), 276–311. doi: 10.1177/0044118X03260498
  • Winner, L. (1986). Do artifacts have politics? In The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. (pp. 19–39). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wong, J., & Hong, J. (2008). What do we “mashup” when we make mashups? In Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on end-user software engineering – WEUSE ’08 (pp. 35–39). New York: ACM Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.