1,207
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Digital divergence: analysing strategy, interpretation and controversy in the case of the introduction of an ebook reader technology

Pages 32-47 | Received 26 Feb 2014, Accepted 12 May 2014, Published online: 10 Jun 2014

References

  • Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002a). The key to success in innovation part I: The art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 187–206.
  • Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002b). The key to success in innovation part II: The art of choosing good spokespersons. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 207–225.
  • Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1992). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 259–264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Anja. (2011). Magnetkortmysteriet. Retrieved May 5, 2014, from http://feltnotater.org/2011/11/magnetkortmysteriet/
  • Boczkowski, P. J. (2005). Digitizing the news: Innovation in online newspapers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Boczkowski, P. J., & Lievrouw, L. A. (2008). Bridging communication studies and science and technology studies: Scholarship on media and information technologies. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch & J. Wajcman (Eds.), New handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 949–978). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 196–233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Callon, M. (2012). Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 83–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chaffey, P. (2011). Ebøker – Du tror det ikke før du får se det. Retrieved May 5, 2014, from http://paulchaffey.blogspot.no/2011/11/ebker-du-tror-det-ikke-fr-du-far-se-det.html#.U2UN5lfDXvQ
  • Chircu, A. M., & Kaufmann, R. J. (1999). Strategies for internet middlemen in the intermediation/disintermediation/reintermediation cycle. Electronic Markets, 9(1–2), 109–117.
  • Colbjørnsen, T. (2012). The Janus strategy: Launching a Norwegian ebook service in an internationalized publishing industry. The International Journal of the Book, 9(1), 61–78.
  • Couldry, N. (2008). Actor network theory and media: Do they connect and on what terms? In A. Hepp (Ed.), Connectivity, networks and flows: Conceptualizing contemporary communications (pp. 93–110). New York: Hampton Press.
  • David, P. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.
  • Engelhardt, H. T., Jr., & Caplan, A. L. (Eds.). (1987). Scientific controversies: Case studies in resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–266). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hannemyr, G. (2003). The internet as hyperbole: A critical examination of adoption rates. The Information Society, 19(2), 11–121.
  • Hård, M. (1994). Technology as practice: Local and global closure processes in diesel-engine design. Social Studies of Science, 24(3), 549–585.
  • Hemmingway, E. (2008). Into the newsroom: Exploring the digital production of regional television news. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutionalization, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kibano. (n.d.). Retrieved from company website: www.kibano.com
  • Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275–305). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Lievrouw, L. A. (2012). New media design and development: Diffusion of innovations v. social shaping of technology. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences of ICT's. [Updated Student Edition, online]. London: Sage.
  • Maguire, J. S., & Matthews, J. (2012). Are we all cultural intermediaries now? An introduction to cultural intermediaries in context. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(5), 551–562. doi:10.1177/1367549412445762
  • Misa, T. J. (1992). Controversy and closure in technological change: Constructing ‘steel’. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 109–139). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Newth, E. (2011). En iPod med påklistret kassettspiller. Retrieved May 5, 2014, from http://newth.net/eirik/2011/11/20/digikort/
  • Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Oudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., & Stienstra, M. (2004). Configuring the user as everybody: Gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values, 29(1), 30–63. doi:10.1177/0162243903259190
  • Pinch, T. (2008). Technology and institutions: Living in a material world. Theory and Society, 37(5), 461–483.
  • Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (2012). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other’. In W. Bijker, T. P. Hughes & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 12–44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Plesner, U. (2009). An actor-network perspective on changing work practices: Communication technologies as actants in newswork. Journalism, 10(604), 604–626.
  • Plesner, U., & Horst, M. (2013). Before stabilization. Information, Communication & Society, 16(7), 1115–1138. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.695387
  • Powell, W. W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In W.W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183–203). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003) [1982]. Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Sassen, S. (2012). Interactions of the technical and the social. Information, Communication & Society, 15(4), 455–478. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.667912
  • Schmitz Weiss, A., & Domingo, D. (2010). Innovation processes in online newsrooms as actor-networks and communities of practice. New Media Society, 12(7), 1156–1171.
  • Schot, J., & de la Bruheze, A. A. (2005). The mediated design of products, consumption, and consumers in the twentieth century. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology (pp. 229–245). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Schwartz Cowan, R. (2012). The consumption junction: A proposal for research strategies in the sociology of technology. In W. Bijker, T. P. Hughes & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 253–272). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Storsul, T., & Krumsvik, A. H. (2013). What is media innovation? In T. Storsul & A. H. Krumsvik (Eds.), Media innovations: A multidisciplinary study of change (pp. 13–26). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
  • Sveinbjørnsson, S. (2011). Vil selge bøker på magnetkort. Retrieved May 5, 2014, from http://www.digi.no/883007/vil-selge-boker-paa-magnetkort
  • Takhteyev, Y. (2009). Networks of practice as heterogeneous actor-networks. Information, Communication & Society, 12(4), 566–583. doi:10.1080/13691180902859369
  • Tian, X., & Martin, B. (2010). Books, bytes and business: The promise of digital publishing. Farnham: Ashgate.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.