Hybrid spaces of politics: the 2013 general elections in Italy, between talk shows and Twitter

References

• Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. J. (1998). Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L. (1994). An ecology of communication: Toward a mapping of the effective environment. The Sociological Quarterly, 35(4), 665–683. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1994.tb00422.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andò, R. (2013). Social TV e political engagement. Come leggere le pratiche delle engaged audience della telepolitica [Social TV and political engagement. How to read the engaged audiences’ practices in telepolitics]. Compol, 3, 319–340. doi:10.3270/75016
   Google Scholar
• Anstead, N., & O'Loughlin, B. (2011). The emerging viewertariat and BBC question time: Television debate and real-time commenting online. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 440–462. doi:10.1177/1940161211415519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atton, C. H., & Hamilton, J. F. (2008). Alternative journalism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. (2012). Transformations through Twitter: The England riots, television viewership and negotiations of power through media convergence. Participations. Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 9(2), 511–525. Retrieved from http://www.participations.org/Volume%209/Issue%202/28%20Bennett.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Benton, M., & Frazier, P. J. (1976). The agenda setting function of mass media at three levels of ‘information holding’. Communication Research, 3(3), 261–274. doi:10.1177/009365027600300302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal, S. (1980). Permanent Campaign. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., & Coleman, S. (2013). Paradigms of civic communication. International Journal of Communication, 7, 173–187. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1964/847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16, 209–230. doi:10.1080/105846099198596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life and beyond: From production to produsage. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Stieglitz, S. (2013). Towards more systematic Twitter analysis: Metrics for tweeting activities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(2), 91–108. doi:10.1080/13645579.2012.756095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpentier, N., Dahlgren, P., & Pasquali, F. (2013). Waves of media democratization: A brief history of contemporary participatory practices in the media sphere. Convergence, 19(3), 287–294. doi:10.1177/1354856513486529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media systems: Politics and power. Oxford, CA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. (2013). Wave-riding and hashtag jumping. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 646–666. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.783609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosenza, V. (2013, January 14). Social TV: Le trasmissioni italiane di maggior successo in Rete [Social TV: The hit online Italian TV shows]. Che Futuro! Retrieved from http://www.chefuturo.it/2013/01/social-tv-le-trasmissioni-di-maggior-successo-in-rete/
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2012). Media, Society, World. Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2004). Postdemocracy. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1992). Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, M., Rowland, D., & Lawson, S. (2011). Co-viewing live TV with digital backchannel streams, (pp.141–144). EuroITV ‘11 proceedings of the 9th international interactive conference on interactive television. doi:10.1145/2000119.2000147
   Google Scholar
• Downing, J., Ford, T. V., Gil, G., & Stein, L. (2001). Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Enli, G., & Moe, H. (2013). Introduction to special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 637–645. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.784795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgacs, D. (1990). Italian culture in the industrial era 1880–1980: Cultural industries, politics and the public. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geerts, D., Cesar, P., & Bulterman, D. (2008). The implications of program genres for the design of social television systems (pp. 71–80). UXTV ‘08: proceedings of the 1st international conference on designing interactive user experiences for TV and Video. doi:10.1145/1453805.1453822
   Google Scholar
• Giglietto, F., & Selva, D. (2014). Second screen and participation: A content analysis on a full season dataset of tweets. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 260–277. doi:10.1111/jcom.12085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google. (2012). The new multi-screen world: Understanding cross-platform consumer behavior (Research report). Retrieved from http://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/insights/library/studies/the-new-multi-screen-world-study/
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128–138). London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Iannelli, L. (2011). Facebook & Co. Sociologia dei Social Network Sites [Facebook & Co. Sociology of Social Network Sites]. Milan: Guerini Scientifica.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M. (2008). Introduction. In K. Varnelis (Ed.), Networked publics (pp. 1–14). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2012). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (Eds.). (1994). Talk on television: Audience participation and public debate. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lochrie, M., & Coulton, P. (2012). Creating a playful experience to encourage participation in the meta-narrative of conference discussions, (pp. 263–266). MindTrek ‘12 Proceedings of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference. doi: 10.1145/2393132.2393190
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, A., Bernstein, M. S., Badar, O., Karger, D. R., Madden, S., & Miller, R. C. (2011). Twitinfo: aggregating and visualizing microblogs for event exploration, 227–236. CHI ‘11 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. doi:10.1145/1978942.1978975
   Google Scholar
• Marinelli, A. (2004). Connessioni. Nuovi Media Nuove Relazioni Sociali [Connections. New Media, New Social Relations]. Milan: Guerini e Associati.
   Google Scholar
• Marinelli, A., & Celata, G. (2012). Connecting television. La Televisione al Tempo di Internet [Connecting television in the internet age]. Milan: Guerini e Associati.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). ‘Mediatization’ of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261. doi:10.1080/105846099198613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. (1976). Agenda setting research: A bibliographic essay. Political Communication Review, 1, 1–7, Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED132575.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Milbrath, L. (1965). Political participation: How and why do people get involved in politics? Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (1980). The nationwide audience: Structure and decoding. British Film Institute Television Monograph, 11. London: British Film Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Morstatter, F., Pfeffer, J., Liu, H., & Carley, K. M. (2013). Is the sample good enough? Comparing data from Twitter's streaming API with Twitter's firehose. ICWSM 2013 proceedings of the seventh international conference on weblogs and social media. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM13/paper/view/6071
   Google Scholar
• Mosca, L. (2014). The five star movement: Exception or vanguard in Europe? The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, 49(1), 36–52. doi:10.1080/03932729.2013.875821
   Google Scholar
• Nakazawa, M., Erdmann, M., Hoashi, K., & Ono, C. (2012). Social indexing of TV programs: Detection and labeling of significant TV scenes by Twitter analysis, 141–146. WAINA ‘12 proceedings of the 26th international conference on advanced information networking and applications workshops. doi:10.1109/WAINA.2012.188
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. (1980). The mass media election: How Americans choose their president. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• PeerReach. (2013). 4 ways how Twitter can keep growing (Research report). Retrieved from http://blog.peerreach.com/2013/11/4-ways-how-twitter-can-keep-growing/
   Google Scholar
• Scaglioni, M., & Sfardini, A. (2013). La traversata di Grillo. Dall'informazione ai programmi d'infotainment: Il pubblico a cinque stelle [The Grillo's crossing From information to infotainment: The five stars audience]. Compol, 1, 153–158. doi:10.3270/72731
   Google Scholar
• Shamma, D. A., Kennedy, L., & Churchill, E. F. (2009). Tweet the debates: Understanding community annotation of uncollected sources, (pp.3–10). Proceedings of the First SIGMM Workshop on Social Media. doi:10.1145/1631144.1631148
   Google Scholar
• Shamma, D. A., Kennedy, L., & Churchill, E. F. (2010). Tweetgeist: Can the twitter timeline reveal the structure of broadcast events? CSCW ‘10 proceedings of the ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. doi:978-1-60558-795-0/10/02
   Google Scholar
• Shamma, D. A., Kennedy, L., & Churchill, E. F. (2011). Peaks and persistence: Modeling the shape of microblog conversations, (pp.355–358). CSCW ‘11 proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on computer supported cooperative work. doi:10.1145/1958824.1958878
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Boyles, J. L. (2012). The rise of the ‘connected viewer’ (Research report). Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Connected_Viewers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, D. L. (1999). About this issue. Political Communication, 16(1), 1–2. doi:10.1080/105846099198730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2013). Follow the leader! Direct and indirected flows of political communication during the 2013 general election campaign. New Media & Society, OnlineFirst Version. doi:10.1177/1461444813511038
   Google Scholar
• Wasko, J., & Mosco, V. (Eds.). (1992). Democratic communications in the information age. Toronto: Garamond Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyber place: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wohn, D. Y., & Na, E. K. (2011). Tweeting about TV: Sharing television viewing experiences via social media message streams. First Monday, 16(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3368/2779
   Google Scholar
• van Zoonen, L. (2005). Entertaining the citizen. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar