562
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The power reinforcement framework revisited: mobile technology and management control in home care

, &
Pages 160-177 | Received 19 Jul 2014, Accepted 29 Apr 2015, Published online: 28 May 2015

References

  • Andersen, K., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23, 236–248.
  • Bekkers, V., & Homburg, V. (Ed.). (2005). The information ecology of E-Government: E-Government as institutional and technological innovation in public administration. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Bretschneider, S. (1990). Management information systems in public and private organizations: An empirical test. Public Administration Review, 50(5), 536–545.
  • Copenhagen Municipality. (2006, March 29). Håndholdt hjemmepleje får Digitaliseringsprisen [Home Care wins Digitization Price]. Press release. Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Models of E-Government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 523–536.
  • Danziger, J., & Kraemer, K. L. (1986). People and computers: The impacts of computing on end users in organizations. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Danziger, J. N. (2004). Innovation in innovation? The technology enactment framework. Social Science Computer Review, 22(1), 100–110.
  • Danziger, J. N., Dutton, W. H., Kling, R., & Kraemer, K. L. (1982). Computers and politics: High technology in American local governments. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Doyle, M., & Timonen, V. (2007). Home care for ageing populations: A comparative analysis of domiciliary care in Denmark, the United States and Germany. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead: Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.
  • Dutton, W. H., & Kraemer, K. L. (1985). Modeling as negotiating: The political dynamics of computer models in the policy process. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. Toronto: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Excitor. (2004). Case study: Care for the elderly with mobile technology from Nokia. Copenhagen: Excitor.
  • Fiordelli, M., Diviani, N., & Schulz, P. J. (2013). Mapping mHealth research: A decade of evolution. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), 95–104.
  • FOA. (2008). Registrering og dokumentation i hjemmeplejen – indtryk fra syv kommuner [Registration and documentation in home care – Experiences from seven municipalities]. Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Fountain, J. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings.
  • Friedman, T. (2007). The world is flat: A brief history of the twentieth century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Gains, F., & Stoker, G. (2009). Delivering ‘public value’: Implications for accountability and legitimacy. Parliamentary Affairs, 62(3), 438–455.
  • Garson, D. G. (2006). Public information technology and E-Governance: Managing the virtual state. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
  • George, J. F., & King, J. L. (1991). Examining the computing and centralization debate. Communications of the ACM, 34(7), 62–72.
  • Health and Care Committee. (1999). Dagsorden, d. 21. April 1999 [Agenda, April 21th 1999]. Copenhagen Municipality, Denmark.
  • Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385–1399.
  • King, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (1985). The dynamics of computing. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Kling, R. (1980). Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. Computing Surveys, 12(1), 61–110.
  • Kraemer, K. L., & Dutton, W. (1984). The interests served by technological reform: The case of computing. In R. Miewald & M. Steinman (Eds.), Problems in administrative reform (pp. 101–122). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
  • Kraemer, K. L., & King, J. L. (2006). Information technology and administrative reform: Will E-Government be different? International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(1), 1–20.
  • Laudon, K. C. (1974). Computers and bureaucratic reform. New York: John Wiley.
  • Leavitt, H. J., & Whisler, T. L. (1958). Management in the 1980s. Harvard Business Review, 36, 41–48.
  • Lützhøft, R. (2005). Projektbeskrivelse. Indførelse af Københavns Omsorgs System (KOS) i Sundhedsforvaltningen [Project description. Internal paper]. Copenhagen Municipality, Denmark.
  • Marx, K. (1906). Capital: A critique of political economy. New York: The Modern Library, Random House.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGA Publication.
  • MoF. (2004). Budgetredegørelse 2004: Udgifter og effektivitet i den offentlige sektor [Budget 2004: Expenses and Efficiency in the Public Sector]. Copenhagen: Author.
  • MoSA. (2005). CareMobil. Introduktion til mobile it-løsninger i ældreplejen [CareMobile. An Introduction to Mobile IT in Home Care]. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Social Affairs.
  • MoSA. (2006a). Strategi for digitalisering af det sociale område 2005–2008 [IT-strategy for the Social Sector 2005–2008]. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Social Affairs.
  • MoSA. (2006b). Vejledning til pulje til bedre og mere fleksibel hjemmehjælp [Government Support for Better and More Flexible Homecare for the Elderly]. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Social Affairs.
  • MoSA. (2007). Dokumentationsprojekt på ældreområdet [Documentation Project in the Elderly Sector]. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Social Affairs.
  • Norris, D., & Reddick, C. (2013). Local E-Government in the United States: Transformation or incremental change? Public Administration Review, 73(1), 165–175.
  • Orlikowski, W. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.
  • Osborne, S. P. (Ed.). (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice. New York: Routledge.
  • Perry, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (1979). Technological innovation in American local governments: The case of computing. New York: Pergamon Press.
  • Pollitt, C. (2012). New perspectives on public services: Place and technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Robey, D., & Sahay, S. (1996). Transforming work through information technology: A comparative case study of geographic information systems in county government. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 93–110.
  • Snellen, I., Thaens, M., & van de Donk, W. (Ed.). (2012). Public administration in the information age: Revisited. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Straussman, J. D. (1978). The limits of technocratic politics. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Teich, A. (2008). Technology and the future. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Volti, R. (Ed.). (2009). Society and technological change. New York: Worth Publishers.
  • West, D. M. (2004). E-Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.
  • Wilson, E. (2006). The information revolution in developing countries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.