1,578
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Network domains in social networking sites: expectations, meanings, and social capital

Pages 188-202 | Received 28 Jan 2015, Accepted 07 May 2015, Published online: 27 May 2015

References

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
  • Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity and digital media (pp. 199–242). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Brandtzæg, P. B. (2012). Social networking sites: Their users and social implications – a longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(4), 467–488.
  • Brooks, B., Howard, T. W., Hogan, B., & Titsworth, S. (2011). Socioeconomic status updates. Information, Communication & Society, 14(4), 529–549.
  • Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Canada (pp. 571–580).
  • Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. In G. Fitzpatrick, S. Hudson, K. Edwards, & T. Rodden (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 10–15). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In B. M. Staw & R. I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 22, pp. 345–423). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Chau, P. Y. K., Cole, M., Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M., & O'Keefe, R. M. (2002). Cultural differences in the online behavior of consumers. Communications of the ACM, 45(10), 138–143.
  • Chiu, W. K., Lau, C. S., & Zhang, H. H. (2014). A study on mainland students’ adjustment in Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://www.cpu.gov.hk/doc/sc/research_reports/final_report_Mainland_students_adjustment_in_hong_kong.pdf
  • Choi, S. M., Kim, Y., Sung, Y., & Sohn, D. (2011). Bridging or bonding: A cross-cultural study of social relationships in social networking sites? Information, Communication & Society, 14(1), 107–129.
  • Corona, V. P., & Godart, F. C. (2010). Network-domains in combat and fashion organizations. Organization, 17, 283–304.
  • Donath, J. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 231–251.
  • Ellison, N., Lampe, C., & Steinfield, C. (2010). With a little help from my friends: Social network sites and social capital. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), The networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp. 124–145). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.
  • Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892.
  • Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855–870.
  • Fine, G. A. (2010). The sociology of the local: Action and its publics. Sociological Theory, 28(4), 355–376.
  • Fuhse, J. A. (2009). The meaning structure of social networks. Sociological Theory, 27, 51–73.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
  • Gondal, N., & McLean, P. D. (2013). Linking tie-meaning with network structure: Variable connotations of personal lending in a multiple-network ecology. Poetics, 41, 122–50.
  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1379.
  • Halavais, A. (2000). National borders on the world wide web. New Media & Society, 1(3), 7–28.
  • Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Washington, DC: Pew Internet Project.
  • Jiang, Y., & de Bruijn, O. (2014). Facebook helps: A case study of cross-cultural social networking and social capital. Information, Communication & Society, 17(6), 732–749.
  • Katz, J. (2001). Analytic induction. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 480–484). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
  • Kim, K. H., & Yun, H. (2007). Cying for me, cying for us: Relational dialectics in a Korean social network site. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). Retrieved October 20, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/kim.yun.html
  • Lee, J., & Lee, H. (2010). The computer-mediated communication network: Exploring the linkage between the online community and social capital. New Media & Society, 12(5), 711–727.
  • Lewis, J., & West, A. (2009). ‘Friending’: London-based undergraduates’ experience of Facebook. New Media & Society, 11(7), 1209–1229.
  • Lin, J. H., Peng, W., Kim, W., LaRose, R., & Kim, S. Y. (2012). Social networking and adjustments among international students. New Media & Society, 14(3), 421–440.
  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mische, A., & White, H. (1998). Between conversation and situation: Public switching dynamics across network domains. Social Research, 65(3), 695–724.
  • Mützel, S. (2009). Networks as culturally constituted processes: A comparison of relational sociology and actor-network theory. Current Sociology, 57(6), 871–887.
  • Padgett, J. F., & McLean, P. D. (2006). Organizational invention and elite transformation: The birth of partnership systems in renaissance Florence. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1463–1568.
  • Padgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. (2012). The problem of emergence. In J. F. Padgett & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The emergence of organizations and markets (pp. 1–29). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227–238.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  • Qiu, L., Lin, H., & Leung, A. K. Y. (2013). Cultural differences and switching of in-group sharing behavior between an American (Facebook) and a Chinese (Renren) social networking site. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 106–121.
  • Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 350–361.
  • Stefanone, M. A., Kwon, K., & Lackaff, D. (2011). The value of online ‘friends’: Networked resources via social network sites. First Monday 16. Retrieved from http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3314/2763
  • Stefanone, M. A., Kwon, K. H., & Lackaff, D. (2012). Exploring the relationship between perceptions of social capital and enacted support online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(4), 451–466.
  • Steinfield, C., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434–445.
  • Takahashi, T. (2010). Myspace or mixi? Japanese engagement with SNS (social networking sites) in the global age. New Media & Society, 12(3), 453–475.
  • Vaughan, D. (1992). Theory elaboration: The heuristics of case analysis. In C. C. Ragin & H. S. Becker (Eds.), What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry (pp. 173–202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • White, H. C. (1995). Network switchings and Bayesian forks: Reconstructing the social and behavioral sciences. Social Research, 62, 1035–1063.
  • White, H. C. (2008). Identity and control: How social formations emerge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Williams, D. (2006). On and off the net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 593–628.
  • Yoder, C., & Stutzman, F. (2011). Identifying social capital in the Facebook interface. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors on Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA.
  • Zhao, S., & Elesh, D. (2008). Copresence as ‘being with’: Social contact in online public domains. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4): 565–583.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.