References
- Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2008, October). Agency and controversy in the YouTube community. Paper presented at IR 9.0: Rethinking Communities, Rethinking Place – Association of Internet Researchers conference, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2009). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
- Callon, M., & Law, J. (1982). On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science, 12, 615–625. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/284830
- Clough, P., Han, S., & Schiff, R. (2007). Book review: A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity by Manuel DeLanda. Theory, Culture & Society, 24, 387–393. doi:10.1177/0263276407086408
- DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society. London: Continuum (Kindle Edition).
- DeLanda, M. (2010). Deleuze: History and science. New York, NY: Atropos.
- Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2006). Dialogues II. London: Continuum.
- Fenton, N., & Barassi, V. (2011). Alternative media and social networking sites. The Communication Review, 14, 179–196.
- Gane, N. (2004). The future of social theory. London: Continuum.
- Harman, G. (2007, April). Networks and assemblages: The rebirth of things in Latour and DeLanda. Paper presented at Goldsmiths College, London.
- Hess, A. (2009). Resistance up in smoke: Analyzing the limitations of deliberation on YouTube. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 26, 411–434.
- Hill, K. (2009). ‘Easy to associate angsty lyrics with buffy’: An introduction to a participatory fan culture. In M. Kirby-Diaz (Ed.), Buffy and angel conquer the Internet: Essays on online fandom (pp. 172–196). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
- Hine, C. (2009). How can qualitative internet researchers define the boundaries of their projects? In A. Markham & N. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 1–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Jenkins, H. (2009). What happened before YouTube. In J. Burgess & J. Green (Eds.), YouTube: Online video and participatory culture (pp. 109–25). Cambridge, MA: Polity.
- Lange, P. (2007, March). Commenting on comments. Paper presented at Society for Applied Anthropology conference, Tampa, FL.
- Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 93–95). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Law, J. (1999). Traduction/Trahison: Notes on ANT. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University. Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/sociology/research/publications/papers/law-traduction-trahison.pdf
- Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
- Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Ng, E. (2008). Reading the romance of fan cultural production. Popular Communication, 6, 103–121. doi:10.1080/15405700701746525
- Press, A., & Livingstone, S. (2006). Taking audience research into the age of new media: Old problems and new challenges. In S. Livingstone, A. Press, M. White, & J. Schwoch (Eds.), Questions of method in cultural studies (pp. 175–200). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Russo, J. L. (2009). User-penetrated content: Fan video in the age of convergence. Cinema Journal, 48, 125–130. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25619735
- Serres, M. (1995). Conversations on science, culture and time with Bruno Latour. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112448/MPU-L1SN.png"})