Network exceptionalism: online action, discourse and the opposition to SOPA and ACTA

References

• Arthur, C. (2012, July 5). Acta didn't stand a chance in the age of the social internet. Comment is Free. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jul/05/acta-anti-counterfeiting-treaty
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y., Roberts, H., Faris, R., Solow-Niederman, A., & Etling, B. (2013). Social mobilization and the networked public sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA Debate. Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2013–16. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2295953
   Google Scholar
• Bodó, B. (2014). Hacktivism 1–2–3: How privacy enhancing technologies change the face of anonymous hacktivism. Internet Policy Review, 3(4). doi:10.14763/2014.4.340
   Google Scholar
• Bridy, A. (2012). Copyright policymaking as procedural democratic process: A discourse-theoretic perspective on ACTA, SOPA, and PIPA. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 30, 153–164.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, H. (2012, April 21). Comment: We should all be hacktivists: In the state-orchestrated grab for cyber-territory our freedom to share data must be enshrined in law. The Guardian, p. 46.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, A., & Hsu, T. (2012, January 18). Popular sites to go dark in protest; In the first such strike, internet staples take aim at anti-piracy bills now before congress. Los Angeles Times, p. B1. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jan/17/business/la-fi-internet-shutdown-20120118
   Google Scholar
• Cheredar, T. (2012). Anonymous says ACTA must be killed with fire, hacks U.S. government websites. Venturebeat. Retrieved October 4, 2013, from http://venturebeat.com/2012/02/17/anonymous-acta-gov-websites-hack/#mc7xbSHzF8TIMV41.99
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. (2011). Anonymous: From lulz to collective action. Media Commons. Retrieved from http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/tne/pieces/anonymous-lulz-collective-action
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (1999). Social movements: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dominguez, R. (2009). Electronic civil disobedience: Inventing the future of online agitprop theater. Proceedings of the Modern Language Association of America: Theories and Methodologies, 124(5), 1806–1812.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar-Hester, C. (2013). What's local? Localism as a discursive boundary object in low-power radio policymaking. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(4), 502–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Wolsfeld, M. A. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. Annals of Academic Political Social Science, 528, 114–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangadharan, S. P. (2013a). Toward a deliberative standard: Rethinking participation in policymaking. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangadharan, S. P. (2013b). Translation in the media ownership debate: The work of civil society groups and the Federal Communications Commission, 2002–2007. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(4), 550–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Bailon, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Moreno, Y. (2013). Broadcasters and hidden influentials in online protest diffusion. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 943–965. doi:10.1177/0002764213479371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, A. (2012, July 11). CTA axing reopens the issue of piracy. The Prague Post.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, T., & Taylor, P. (2004). Hacktivism and cyberwar: Rebels with a cause. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelty, C. (2005). Geeks, social imaginaries, and recursive publics. Cultural Anthropology, 20(2), 185–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konieczny, P. (2014). The day Wikipedia stood still: Wikipedia's editors’ participation in the 2012 anti-SOPA protests as a case study of online organization empowering international and national political opportunity structures. Current Sociology, 62(7), 994–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. (2012, February 11). Acta protests: Thousands take to streets across Europe. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16999497
   Google Scholar
• Lemley, M., Levine, D. S., & Post, D. G. (2011). Don't break the internet. Stanford Law Review Online, 64, 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, D. (2012). Bring in the Nerds: Secrecy, national security, and the creation of international intellectual property law. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 30, 105–151.
   Google Scholar
• Miekle, G. (2002) Future active: Media activism and the internet. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mochnacki, A. (2013). Calling all copyfighters: Experts as superheroes, comic books as intervention and boundary making in Canadian copyright policy. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(4), 525–549.
   Google Scholar
• Oz, A. (2012). Legitimacy and efficacy: The blackout of Wikipedia. First Monday, 17(12). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4043
   Google Scholar
• Postigo, H. (2012). The digital rights movement: The role of technology in subverting digital copyright. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Relaxnews. (2012, February 9). European Internet campaigners battle ACTA. Agence France-Press: AFP-Relaxnews.
   Google Scholar
• Sauter, M. (2013). “LOIC will tear us apart”: The impact of tool design and media portrayals in the success of activist DDOS attacks. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 983–1007. doi:10.1177/0002764213479370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaake, Maritje. (2012, January 25). ACTA: Note from Marietje Schaake, Member of the European Parliament. Reddit.com. Retrieved from http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/ow1v5/acta_note_from_marietje_
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, S. (2013). The US SOPA and PIPA − A European perspective. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 27(1–2), 213–229. doi:10.1080/13600869.2013.764141
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & A. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133–155) New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeter, T. (1996). Selling the air: A critique of the policy of commercial broadcasting in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeter, T. (2013). Policy, politics and discourse. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(4), 488–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2013). “Not this one”: Social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 848–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timpane, J. (2012, January 18). Anti-piracy measures bring Black Wednesday; occupy the Web: Sites going dark to protest bills. The Philadelphia Inquirer, p. A01.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, B. E., & Bowers, G. B. (2014). Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444814535194
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, C. (2012). A post-SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) shift in international intellectual property norm creation. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 15, 379–388.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, R., & Swartz, J. (2012, January 19). Internet community cheers power of protest: Hundreds of websites showed their support. USA TODAY, p.1B.
   Google Scholar