Shared entanglements – Web 2.0, info-liberalism & digital sharing

References

• Agamben, G. (2009). What is an apparatus? And other essays. (D. Kishik & S. Pedatella, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2010). Happy objects. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 29–51). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aigrain, P. (2012). Sharing: Culture and the economy in the Internet age. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. (2009). iSpy: Surveillance and power in the interactive era. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. (2013). Whither-ing critique. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 10, 222–228. doi: 10.1080/14791420.2013.812592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banning, M. (2013). Manufacturing uncertainty: Contemporary U.S. public life and the conservative right. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 715–734. Retrieved from http://0-www.jstor.org.libraries.colorado.edu/stable/10.1086/612649 doi: 10.1086/612649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2014, May 22). You are what you can access: Sharing & collaborative consumption. Keynote paper presented at the Digital Sharing pre-conference at the International Communication Association, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2004). Sharing nicely: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. The Yale Law Journal, 114, 273–358. Retrieved from http://www.yalelawjournal.org/essay/sharing-nicely-on-shareable-goods-and-the-emergence-of-sharing-as-a-modality-of-economic-production doi: 10.2307/4135731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, S. (2014, December 20). Justice Sacco is good at her job, and how I came to peace with her. Gawker.  Retrieved from http://gawker.com/justine-sacco-is-good-at-her-job-and-how-i-came-to-pea-1653022326
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. (2008). The rhetoric of video games. In K. Salem (Ed.), The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games and learning (pp. 117–140). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, T. (2004). The transmission of affect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (2006). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? (Working Paper No. 005). Centre de Sociologie de I'Innovations.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2000). Good to talk? Living and working in a communication culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Catlaw, T. J., & Sandberg, B. (2014). ‘Dangerous government’: Info-liberalism, active citizenship, and the open government directive. Administration & Society, 46, 223–254. doi: 10.1177/0095399712461912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, P. T. (2010). The affective turn: Political economy, biomedia, and bodies. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 206–225). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. E. (2011). A world of becoming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. (2014). A message from Tim Cook about Apple's commitment to your Privacy. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/privacy/
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialism: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. (2008). Life as surplus: Biotechnology & capitalism in the neoliberal era. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. (2002). Publicity's secret: How technoculture capitalizes on democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission. (2014). Data brokers: A call for transparency and accountability. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/reports/data-brokers-call-transparency-accountability-report-federal-trade-commission-may-2014
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The confession of the flesh. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 194–228). New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital labour and Karl Marx. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gatens, M. (2004). Privacy and the body: The publicity of affect. In B. Roessler (Ed.), Privacies: Philosophical evaluations (pp. 113–132). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, R. W. (2011). The archive and the processor: The internal logic of Web 2.0. New Media Society, 13, 1228–1244. doi:10.1177/1461444811401735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, A. (2001). Contagious feelings: Pauline Hanson and the epidemiology of affect. Australian Humanities Review. Retrieved from http://australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-December-2001/gibbs.html
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, A. (2010). After affect: Sympathy, synchrony, and mimetic communication. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 186–2005). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boszkowski & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T., Boszkowski, P. J., & Foot, K. A. (2014). Introduction. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boszkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 1–17). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gitelman, L. (2006). Always already new: Media, history, and the data of culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossberg, L. (2010). Affect's future: Rediscovering the virtual in the actual. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 309–338). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinan, B., & Striphas, T. (2014). Recommended for you: The Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://nms.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/02/02/1461444814538646.full.pdf+html
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2010). Towards speculative realism: Essay and lectures. Winchester: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. K. (2010). Cybernetics. In W. J. T. Mitchell & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Critical terms for media studies (pp. 145–156). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, A. (2014, January 6). Why women aren't welcome on the Internet. Pacific Standard. Retrieved from http://www.psmag.com/health-and-behavior/women-arent-welcome-internet-72170#.Usq9QZi5wZA.twitter
   Google Scholar
• John, N. A. (2012). Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society, 15, 167–182. doi:10.1177/1461444812450684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, N. A. (2013). The social logics of sharing. The Communication Review, 16, 113–131. doi:10.1080/10714421.2013.807119
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S. (2002). Critique of information. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mager, A. (2012). Algorithmic ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 769–787. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.676056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2010). The future birth of the affective fact: The political ontology of threat. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 52–70). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2015). The power at the end of the economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDiad, C. (2014, February 13). Ethical growth hacking. Retrieved from http://www.adaptivemobile.com/blog/ethical-growth-hacking
   Google Scholar
• Morell, M. F. (2011). The unethics of sharing: Wikiwashing. International Review of Information Ethics, 15, 9–16. Retrieved from http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/015/015_full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moscoe, V. (2014). To the cloud: Big data in a turbulent world. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, J. M. (2010). Introduction: Property, commoning and the politics of free software. The Commoner, 14, 8–48. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228319386_Introduction_Property_Commoning_and_the_Politics_of_Free_Software
   Google Scholar
• Probyn, E. (2005). Blush: Faces of shame. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proveti, J. (2009). Political affect: Connecting the social and the somatic. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ronson, J. (2015, February 12). How one stupid tweet blew up Justice Sacco's life. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/magazine/how-one-stupid-tweet-ruined-justine-saccos-life.html
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (2013). In search of the lost paycheck. In T. Scholz (Ed.), Digital labor: The Internet as playground and factory (pp. 13–32). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, D. (1988). How to think about information. In V. Mosco & J. Wasko (Eds.), The political economy of information (pp. 27–43). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, D. (1997). The information commodity: A preliminary view. In J. Davis, T. A. Hirschl, & M. Stack (Eds.), Cutting edge: Technology, information capitalism and social revolution (pp. 103–120). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, D. (1999). Digital capitalism: Networking the global market system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, D. (2007). How to think about information. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, H. I. (1981). Who knows: Information in the age of the Fortune 500. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, H. I. (1984). Information and the crisis economy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, H. I. (1989). Culture, Inc: The corporate takeover of American expression. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, T. (2008). The Web 2.0 ideology. First Monday: Peer-reviewed journal on the Internet, 13(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/issue/view/263 doi: 10.5210/fm.v13i3.2138
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, T. (2013). Digital labor: The Internet as playground and factory. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, T. (2014). Digital labor. Retrieved from http://digitallabor.org/
   Google Scholar
• Sedwick, E. K. (2003). Touching feeling: Affect, performativity, pedagogy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Söderberg, J., & Daoud, A. (2012). Atoms want to be free too! Expanding the critique of intellectual property to physical goods. TripleC, 10(1), 66–77. Retrieved from http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/288
   Google Scholar
• Stalder, F., & Sützl, W. (2011). Ethics of sharing. International Review of Information Ethics, 15, 2–3. Retrieved from http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/015/015_full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space politics, affect. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2009). Understanding the affective spaces of political culture. In M. Smith, J. Davidson, L. Cameron, & L. Bondi (Eds.), Emotion, place and culture (pp. 79–95). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2010). Understanding the material practices of glamour. In M. Gregg & G.J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect reader (pp. 289–308). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrichhio, W. (2011). The algorithmic turn: Photosynth, augmented reality and the changing implications of the image. Visual Studies, 26(1), 25–35. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2011.548486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1961). The long revolution. London: Chatto & Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wittel, A. (2011). Qualities of sharing and their transformation in the digital age. International Review of Information Ethics, 15, 4–8. Retrieved from http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/015/015-Wittel.pdf
   Google Scholar