Crowds and value. Italian Directioners on Twitter

References

• Anger, I., & Kittl, C. (2011). Measuring influence on Twitter. i–KNOW ‘11: Proceedings of the 11th International conference on knowledge management and knowledge technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A. (2012). The potential of consumer publics. Ephemera, 13, 367–391. Retrieved from http://www.ephemerajournal.org/contribution/potential-consumer-publics
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., & Bonini, T. (2015). Valuing audience passions. From Smythe to Tarde. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(2), 158–173. doi: 10.1177/1367549414563297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., & Peitersen, N. (2013). The ethical economy. Rebuilding value after the crisis. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Everyone's an influencer: Quantifying influence on Twitter. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 65–74). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Mathieu, J. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. ICWSM 8: 361–362.
   Google Scholar
• Bastos, M., Raimundo, R., & Travitzki, R. (2013). Gatekeeping Twitter: Message diffusion in political hashtags. Media, Culture & Society, 35, 260–270. doi:10.1177/0163443712467594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, N. (2007). The new shape of online community. The example of Swedish independent music fandom. First Monday, 12. doi:10.5210/fm.v12i8.1978
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. (2012). Music fandom online: REM fans in pursuit of the ultimate first listen. New Media & Society, 14, 748–763. doi:10.1177/1461444811422895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 739–768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Walker, S. (2014). Organization in the crowd: Peer production in large-scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 232–260. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.870379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borch, C. (2012). The politics of crowds: An alternative history of sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borch, C., & Knudsen, B. T. (2013). Postmodern crowds: Re-inventing crowd thinking. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 14, 109–113. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2013.821012
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2014). It's Complicated. The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. Proceedings of the system sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii international conference, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. (1978). Popular culture in early modern Europe. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Canetti, E. (1962). Crowds and power. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Krishna Gummadi, P. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. ICWSM, 10, 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. (2013). Coding freedom: The ethics and aesthetics of hacking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S., & Johnstone, J. (1963). The adolescent society. Glencoe: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity. A critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1992). The cultural economy of fandom. In L. Leawis (Ed.), The adoring audience. Fan culture and popular media (pp. 30–49). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444812472322
   Google Scholar
• Gerlitz, C., & Lury, C. (2014). Social media and self-evaluating assemblages: On numbers, orderings and values. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15, 174–188. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267
   Google Scholar
• Greene, A. (2012, May 8). The new British invasion: Boy bands. Rolling Stone. Retrieved July 8, from http://rollingstoneindia.com/the-new-british-invasion-boy-bands/
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, A. (2006). Sports crowds. In J. Schnapp & M. Tews (Eds.), Crowds (pp. 111–132). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L.-K., Arvidsson, A., Nielsen, F. -A., Colleoni, E., & Etter, M. (2011). Good friends, bad news. Affect and virality in Twitter. Future information technology. Berlin: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Litt, E. (2011). The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults. New Media & Society, 13, 824–842. doi:10.1177/1461444811405805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, A. (2008). Meat, mask, burden. Probing the contours of the branded self. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), 197–217. doi:10.1177/1469540508090086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, L., Dan, O., & Davison, B. D. (2011). Predicting popular messages in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World Wide Web (pp. 57–58). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S., & Kim, C-H. (2013). Surfing the Korean wave. A postcolonial critique of the mythologized middlebrow consumer culture in Asia. Qualitative Market Research, 16(1), 53–75. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13522751311289767
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (1993). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelty, C. M. (2008). Two bits: The cultural significance of free software. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Lepinay, V. A. (2009). The science of passionate interests-an introduction to: Gabriel Tarde's economic anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., Rodrigo, Z., & Hermida, V. A. (2013). Content analysis in an era of big data: A hybrid approach to computational and manual methods. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1), 34–52. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.761702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N., & Weltevrede, E. (2013). Scraping the social. Journal of Cultural Economy, 6, 313–335. doi:10.1080/17530350.2013.772070
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13, 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. (2013). Status update. Celebrity, publicity and branding in the social media age. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence, 17, 139–158. doi:10.1177/1354856510394539
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2011b). The drama! Teen conflict, gossip, and bullying in networked publics. A decade in Internet time: Symposium on the dynamics of the Internet and society Oxford, September 12.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, M. (2013). Freaks, geeks, and cool kids. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Page, R. (2012). The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse & Communication, 6, 181–201. doi:10.1177/1750481312437441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z., & de Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62, 266–282. doi:10.1111/j.1460–2466.2012.01630.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1942). Age and sex in the social structure of the United States. American Sociological Review, 7, 604–616. doi: 10.2307/2085686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poell, T., & Borra, E. (2012). Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 Protests. Journalism, 13(6), 695–713. doi:10.1177/1464884911431533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesman, D. (1950). The lonely crowd. A study of the changing American character. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2012). Digital methods. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, T. (2007). The accidental topology of digital culture: How the network becomes viral.’ Transformations, 14. Retrieved from http://www.transformationsjournal.org/journal/issue_14/article_05.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Schiermer, B. (2012). Aura, cult value, and the postmodern crowd: A Durkheimian reading of Walter Benjamin’s artwork essay. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 14, 191–210. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2012.738609
   Google Scholar
• Senft, T. M. (2008). Camgirls: Celebrity and community in the age of social networks. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D. (1998). Trading sexpics on IRC: Embodiment and authenticity on the Internet. Body & Society, 4, 91–117. doi:10.1177/1357034X98004004005
   Google Scholar
• Stage, C. (2013). The online crowd: A contradiction in terms? On the potentials of Gustave Le Bon's crowd psychology in an analysis of affective blogging. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 14, 211–226. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2013.773261
   Google Scholar
• Stäheli, U. (2011). Seducing the crowd. The leader in crowd psychology. New German Critique, 38, 63–77. doi:10.1215/0094033X-1340048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. (1962[1903]). The laws of imitation. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. (1969). The public and the crowd. In T. Clark (Ed.), Gabriel tarde on communication and social influence (pp. 277–296). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. (1902). Psychologie économique. Paris: Altan.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2008). Pass it on: Towards a political economy of propensity. Emotion, Space and Society, 1, 83–96. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2009.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Ticineto, P., & Halley, S. (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Krieken, R. (2012) Celebrity society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J., & Dodds, P. S. (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441–458. doi: 10.1086/518527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. An outline of interpretative sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wernick, A. (1991). Promotional culture: Advertising, ideology and symbolic expression. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation. A linguistic perspective on twitter. New Media & Society 13, 788–806. doi: 10.1177/1461444810385097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar