Copyright, digital sharing, and the liberal order: sociolegal constructions of intellectual property in the era of mass digitization

References

• Aigrain, P. (2012). Sharing: Culture and the economy in the internet age. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, J. (2009). For the good of the net: The pirate bay as a strategic sovereign. Culture Machine, 10(1), 64–108.
   Google Scholar
• The BBC. (2014, July 18). UK anti-piracy campaign set to begin. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-28374457
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. (2008). The public domain: Enclosing the commons of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, K. (1995). Intellectual property rights and the culture of global liberalism. Science Communication, 17(2), 214–232. doi: 10.1177/1075547095017002007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. (2011). The hegemonic copyright-regime vs. the sharing copyright users of music? Media, Culture and Society, 33, 491–502. doi: 10.1177/0163443711398764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, M. A. (2013). SOPA, PIPA, ACTA, TPP: An alphabet soup of innovation-stifling copyright legislation and agreements. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 11(2), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, A., & Stokes, G. (1998). Liberal democracy and its critics: Perspectives in contemporary political thought. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Copps, S. (1996, October 3). Canada. Parliament. Standing Committee on Canadian heritage (Meeting No. 21). 35th Parliament, 2nd session. Retrieved from http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/archives/committee/352/heri/evidence/21_96-10-03/heri21_blk-e.html
   Google Scholar
• Copyright Modernization Act, S. C. c. 20. (2012). Retrieved from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/2012_20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cvetkovski, T. (2013). Copyright and popular media: Liberal villains and technological change. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dawdy, S. L., & Bonni, J. (2012). Towards a general theory of piracy. Anthropological Quarterly, 85, 673–699. doi: 10.1353/anq.2012.0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drahos, P., & Braithwaite, J. (2002). Information feudalism: Who owns the knowledge economy? London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Ducharme, M., & Constant, J. F. (2009). Introduction: A project of rule called Canada – the liberal order framework and historical practice. In J. F. Constant & M. Ducharme (Eds.), Liberalism and hegemony: Debating the Canadian liberal revolution (pp. 3–32). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dur, A. (2008). Measuring interest group influence in the EU: A note on methodology. European Union Politics, 9, 559–576. doi: 10.1177/1465116508095151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dur, A., & Mateo, G. (2014). Public opinion and interest group influence: How citizen groups derailed the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement. Journal of European Public Policy, 21, 1199–1217. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.900893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFF. (2014). Unintended consequences: Sixteen years under the DMCA. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/files/2014/09/16/unintendedconsequences2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Engstrom, C., & Falkvinge, R. (2012). The case for copyright reform. Stockholm: Piratpartiet. http://www.copyrightreform.eu/sites/copyrightreform.eu/files/The_Case_for_Copyright_Reform.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foote, J. (2011, December 12). Canada. Parliament. House of Commons. Edited Hansard 146(65). 41st Parliament, 1st session. Retrieved from http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=41&Ses=1&DocId=5326291
   Google Scholar
• Helfer, L. R. (2006). Toward a human rights framework for intellectual property. UC Davis Law Review, 40, 971–1009.
   Google Scholar
• Jaszi, P. (1991). Toward a theory of copyright: The metamorphoses of ‘authorship’. Duke Law Journal, 1991, 455–502. doi: 10.2307/1372734
   Google Scholar
• Krikorian, G. (2010). Free-trade agreements and neoliberalism: How to derail the political rationales that impose strong intellectual property protection. In G. Krikorian & A. Kapczynski (Eds.), Access to knowledge in the age of intellectual property (pp. 293–328). New York, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Leroux, G. (1997, March 13). Canada. Parliament. House of Commons. Edited Hansard 134(144). 41st Parliament, 1st session. Retrieved from http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/House/352/Debates/144/han144-e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Litman, J. (1989). Copyright legislation and technological change. Oregon Law Review, 68, 275–361.
   Google Scholar
• MacPherson, C. B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacPherson, C. B. (1977). The life and times of liberal democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, R., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2013). Copyright infringement online: The case of the Digital Economy Act judicial review in the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 15, 1312–1328. doi: 10.1177/1461444812470429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, C. (2000). Global political economy of intellectual property rights: The new enclosures? New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• May, C., & Sell, S. K. (2006). Intellectual property rights: A critical history. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienners.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, I. (2000). The liberal order framework: A prospectus for a reconnaissance of Canadian history. Canadian Historical Review, 81, 616–678. doi: 10.3138/chr.81.4.616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghadam, V. M. (2013). Globalization and social movements: Islamism, feminism, and the global justice movement (2nd ed.). Toronto: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Pagallo, U. (2010). Ethics among peers: File sharing on the internet between openness and precaution. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society, 8(2), 136–149. doi: 10.1108/14779961011040550
   Google Scholar
• Paradis, C. (2011, October 18). Canada. Parliament. House of Commons. Edited Hansard 146(31). 41st Parliament, 1st session. Retrieved from http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=41&Ses=1&DocId=5176357
   Google Scholar
• Peifer, K. N. (2010). The return of the commons – Copyright history as a common source. In R. Deazley, M. Kretschmer, & L. Bently (Eds.), Privilege and property: Essays on the history of copyright (pp. 347–357). Cambridge: Open Book.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poggi, G. (1978/2004). The development of the modern state: A sociological introduction. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (1944/2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postigo, H. (2012a). The digital rights movement: The role of technology in subverting digital copyright. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postigo, H. (2012b). Cultural production and the digital rights movement: Framing the right to participate in culture. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 1165–1185. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.568509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitman, R. (2012, August 8). Repealing French three strikes law is the next step to safeguarding free expression. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/08/repeal-french-three-strikes-law
   Google Scholar
• Sell, S. K. (2003). Private power, public law: The globalization of intellectual property rights. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• St. Clair, W. (2010). Metaphors of intellectual property. In R. Deazley, M. Kretschmer, & L. Bently (Eds.), Privilege and property: Essays on the history of copyright (pp. 369–395). Cambridge: Open Book.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, M. (2011, November 24). Canada. Parliament. House of Commons. Edited Hansard 146(53). 41st Parliament, 1st session. Retrieved from http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=41&Ses=1&DocId=5275129
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, M., & Larsson, S. (2012). Intellectual property law compliance in Europe: Illegal file sharing and the role of social norms. New Media & Society, 14, 1147–1163. doi: 10.1177/1461444812439553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, P. (1999). Innovation, electronic publishing and the management of intellectual property: What of digital piracy? Information, Communication & Society, 2(1), 45–68. doi: 10.1080/136911899359754
   Google Scholar
• Wortham, J. (2012, January 19). Public outcry over antipiracy bills began as grass-roots grumbling. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/20/technology/public-outcry-over-antipiracy-bills-began-as-grass-roots-grumbling.html?pagewanted=1&ref=technology&_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, C. (2012). A post-SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) shift in international intellectual property norm creation. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 15, 379–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2012.00443.x
   Google Scholar