6,750
Views
103
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Digital skills and social media use: how Internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives’

Pages 1095-1107 | Received 15 Jan 2015, Accepted 11 Aug 2015, Published online: 14 Sep 2015

References

  • Agostini, C., & Willington, M. (2012). Acceso y uso de internet en Chile: evolución y factores determinantes. Revista Persona y Sociedad, 26(1), 11–42.
  • Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication, 17, 65–84. doi: 10.1177/0267323102017001607
  • Bunz, U. (2009). A generational comparison of gender, computer anxiety, and computer-email-web fluency. Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education, 9(2), 54–69. doi: 10.3138/sim.9.2.003
  • Castells, M. (2000). La era de la información: economía, sociedad y cultura. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Chen, W., & Wellman, B. (2003). Charting and bridging digital divides. I-Ways, 26(4), 155–161.
  • Cho, J., Gil de Zuniga, H., Rojas, H., & Shah, D. V. (2003). Beyond access: The digital divide and Internet uses and gratifications. IT & Society, 1(4), 46–72.
  • Comstock, G., & Scharrer, E. (1999). Television: What's on, who's watching, and what it means. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Correa, T. (2010). The participation divide among ‘web experts’: Experience, skills, and psychological factors as predictors of college students’ web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 71–92. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01532.x
  • Correa, T. (2014). Bottom-up technology transmission within families: Exploring how youths influence their parents in the usage of digital media with dyadic data. Journal of Communication, 64, 103–124. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12067
  • Correa, T., & Jeong, S.-H. (2011). Race and online content creation. Why minorities are actively participating in the Web. Information, Communication, and Society, 14(5), 638–659. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2010.514355
  • Correa, T., Straubhaar, J. D., Chen, W., & Spence, J. (2015). Brokering new technologies: The role of children in their parents’ usage of the Internet. New Media and Society, 17(4), 483–500. doi: 10.1177/1461444813506975
  • van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2009). Using the Internet: Skill related problems in users' online behavior. Interacting with Computers, 21(5), 393–402. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2009.06.005
  • van Deursen, J., & van Dijk, J. (2010). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 13(6), 896–911. doi:10.1177/1461444810386774
  • van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526.
  • van Dijk, J. (2004). Divides in succession: Possession, skills, and use of new media for societal participation. In J. N. Newhagen & E. Bucy (Eds.), Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use (pp. 233–254). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • van Dijk, J. A. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4), 221–235.
  • DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social Inequality (pp. 355–400). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2013). Social media update 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved September 11, 2013, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/12/30/social-media-update-2013/
  • Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide [electronic version]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6. Retrieved September 28, 2008 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html
  • Ettema, J. Brown, J., & Luepker, R. (1983). Knowledge gap effects in health information campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 516–527. doi: 10.1086/268809
  • Ettema, J., & Kline, F. (1977). Deficits, differences and ceilings. Contingent conditions for understanding the knowledge gap. Communication Research, 4, 179–202. doi: 10.1177/009365027700400204
  • Eveland, W. (2001). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from non-election off-year election and presidential election contexts. Communication Research, 28(5), 571–601. doi: 10.1177/009365001028005001
  • Gatignon, H. A., & Roberston, T. S. (1991). A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. In H. H. Kassarjian & T. S. Robertson (Eds.), Perspectives in consumer behavior (4th ed., pp. 461–487). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
  • Gui, M., & Argentin, G. (2011). Digital skills of Internet natives: Different forms of Internet literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13(6), 963–980. doi: 10.1177/1461444810389751
  • de Haan, J. (2004). A multifaceted dynamic model of the digital divide. IT & Society, 1(7), 66–88.
  • Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills [electronic version]. First Monday, 7. Retrieved October 10, 2008 from http://www.firstmonday.org/Issues/issue74/hargittai/
  • Hargittai, E. (2005). Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 23(3), 371–379
  • Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the ‘Net generation’. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
  • Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602–621. doi:10.1177/0093650208321782
  • Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2012). Succinct survey measures of web-use skills. Social Science Computer Review, 30(1), 95-107
  • Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432–448.
  • Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society, 11(2), 239–256. doi: 10.1080/13691180801946150
  • Hassani, S. N. (2006). Locating digital divides at home, work, and everywhere else. Poetics, 34(4–5), 250–272. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.007
  • Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x
  • Howard, P. N., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the Internet: The impact of diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 383–404.
  • Katz, V. (2010). How children of immigrants use media to connect their families with the community. Journal of Children and Media, 4(3), 298–315. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2010.486136
  • Litt, E. (2013). Measuring users’ internet skills: A review of past assessments and a look toward the future. New Media and Society, 15(4), 612–630.
  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 9(4), 671–696. doi: 10.1177/1461444807080335
  • Meulemann, H. (2012). Information and entertainment in European mass media systems: Preferences for and uses of television and newspapers. European Sociological Review, 28(2), 186–202. doi:10.1093/esr/jcq058
  • Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Adolescents’ internet use: Testing the ‘‘disappearing digital divide’’ versus the ‘‘emerging digital differentiation’’ Approach. Poetics, 34(4–5), 293–305.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6.
  • Price, V., & Czilli, E. J. (1996). Modeling patterns of news recognition and recall. Journal of Communication, 46(2), 55–78.
  • Rubin, A. (1994). Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research. LEA's communication series (pp. 417–436). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • School of Journalism UDP-Feedback. (2013). Participación de jóvenes: Encuesta de opinión pública Periodismo UDP-Feedback 2013. Santiago: Universidad Diego Portales Feedback.
  • Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native-myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 61(4), 364–379. doi:10.1108/00012530910973776
  • Shih, C.-F., & Venkatesh, A. (2004). Beyond adoption: Development and application of a use-diffusion model. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 59–72. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.68.1.59.24029
  • Subtel. (2014). Estudio quinta encuesta sobre acceso, usos, usuarios y disposición de pago por Internet en zonas urbanas y rurales de Chile. Santiago: Subsecretaría de Telecomunicaciones.
  • Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the Net generation. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
  • Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 920–942. doi:10.1177/0002764213479375
  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  • Wasserman, I. M., & Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005). Gender and the Internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 252–270. doi: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00301.x
  • Wicks, R. H. (1992). Schema theory and measurement in mass communication research: Theoretical and methodological issues in news information processing. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 15 (pp. 115–145). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • World Internet Project Chile. (2014). Confianza, internet y comercio electrónico: Resultados de la 6ª encuesta WIP Chile 2014. Santiago: World Internet project.
  • Zillien, N., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: Status-specific types of Internet usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.