Sharing the small moments: ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat

References

• Bentley, F. R., & Metcalf, C. J. (2008). Location and activity sharing in everyday mobile communication. Proceedings of CHI, pp. 2453–2462. ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1358702
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (2011). Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science, 22(7), 891–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (2013). Beyond viral: Interpersonal communication in the internet age. Psychological Inquiry, 24(4), 293–296. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2013.842203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M., Bakshy, E., Burke, M., Karrer, B., & Park, M. (2013). Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. Proceedings of CHI, 21–30. doi:10.1145/2470654.2470658
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M., Monroy-Hernández, A., Harry, D., André, P., Panovich, K., & Vargas, G. (2011). 4chan and /b/: An analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. Proceedings of AAAI, 50–57. doi:10.1.1.207.9761
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self (pp. 39–58). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2015). Studying normal, everyday social media. Social Media + Society, 1(1), 1–2. doi:10.1177/2056305115580484
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, K. (2015). Tasking the everyday: Where mobile and online communication take time. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(1), 36–52. doi:10.1177/2050157914546711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. W. (2015). Mobile communication and network privatism: A literature review of the implications for diverse, weak, and new ties. Review of Communication Research, 3, 1–21. doi:10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2015.03.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clawson, J., Voida, A., Patel, N., & Lyons, K. (2008). Mobiphos: A collocated-synchronous mobile photo sharing application. Proceedings of Mobile HCI, pp. 187–195. ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1409261
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counts, S., & Fellheimer, E. (2004). Supporting social presence through lightweight photo sharing on and off the desktop. Proceedings of CHI, pp. 599–606. ACM. doi:10.1145/985692.985768
   Google Scholar
• Coupland, J. (2003). Small talk: Social functions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(1), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, M. R. (1988). Does happiness mean friendliness? Induced mood and heterosexual self-disclosure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(2), 283–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donath, J. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 231–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, S., Rutt, D. J., Hoy, M., & Strejc, H. H. (1991). Some evident truths about conversations in everyday relationships: All communications are not created equal. Human Communication Research, 18(2), 228–267. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00545.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, N. I., Taylor, S. E., Gable, S., Hilmert, C. J., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Neural pathways link social support to attenuated neuroendocrine stress responses. NeuroImage, 35, 1601–1612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855–870. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P., Bower, G. H., & Krantz, S. E. (1984). The influence of mood on perceptions of social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20(6), 497–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228–245. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, A. L. (2014). Text-based communication influences self-esteem more than face-to-face or cellphone communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 197–203. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, J. T. (2007). Digital deception. Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology, 61(5), 289–301.
   Google Scholar
• Hepach, R., Kliemann, D., Gruneisen, S., Heekeren, H. R., & Dziobek, I. (2011). Conceptualizing emotions along the dimensions of valence, arousal, and communicative frequency - implications for social cognitive tests and training tools. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. Proceedings of CHI, pp. 119–125. ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=142769
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, D. S., Lin, C. A., & Atkin, D. J. (2014). Communicating social relationships via the use of photo-messaging. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(2), 234–252. doi:10.1080/08838151.2014.906430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. E., & Crocker, E. T. (2015). Selfies and photo messaging as visual conversation: Reports from the United States, United Kingdom, and China. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1861–1872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaun, A., & Stiernstedt, F. (2014). Facebook time: Technological and institutional affordances for media memories. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1154–1168. doi:10.1177/1461444814544001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keightley, E. (2013). From immediacy to intermediacy: The mediation of lived time. Time & Society, 22(1), 55–75. doi:10.1177/0961463X11402045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330(6006), 932–932. doi:10.1126/science.1192439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, B. E., Coffey, K. A., Cohn, M. A., Catalino, L. I., Vacharkulksemsuk, T., Algoe, S. B., … Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). How positive emotions build physical health: Perceived positive social connections account for the upward spiral between positive emotions and vagal tone. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1123–1132. doi:10.1177/0956797612470827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotfila, C. (2014). This message will self-destruct: The growing role of obscurity and self-destructing data in digital communication. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40(2), 12–16. doi:10.1002/bult.2014.1720400206
   Google Scholar
• Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D. S., Lin, N., … Ybarra, O. (2013). Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PloS One, 8(8), e69841. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, N. M., Gwinn, A. M., Baumeister, R. F., Strachman, A., Washburn, I. J., Gable, S. L., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). A boost of positive affect: The perks of sharing positive experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(1), 24–43. doi:10.1177/0265407512449400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, E. J. (1989). Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness–mindfulness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 137–173.
   Google Scholar
• Leavitt, A. (2015). “This is a throwaway account”: Temporary technical identities and perceptions of anonymity in a massive online community. Proceedings of CSCW, pp. 317–327. ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2675175
   Google Scholar
• Litt, E., & Hargittai, E. (2014). Smile, snap, and share? A nuanced approach to privacy and online photo-sharing. Poetics, 42, 1–21. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2013.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology and Marketing, 8(1), 43–57. doi:10.1002/mar.4220080105
   Google Scholar
• Mark, G., Iqbal, S., Czerwinski, M., & Johns, P. (2014). Capturing the mood : Facebook and Face-to-Face encounters in the workplace. Proceedings of CSCW, pp. 1082–1094. ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2531673
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16, 1051–1067. doi:10.1177/1461444814543995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morelli, S. A., Lieberman, M. D., & Zaki, J. (2015). The emerging study of positive empathy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okabe, D., & Ito, M. (2006). Everyday contexts of camera phone use: Steps toward technosocial ethnographic frameworks. In J. R. Höflich& M. Hartmann (Eds.), Mobile communication in everyday life: Ethnographic views, observations, and reflections (pp. 79–102). Berlin, Germany: Franks and Timme.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (2013). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkul, D., & Humphreys, L. (2015). Record and remember: Memory and meaning-making practices through mobile media. Mobile Media & Communication, 3, 351–365. doi:10.1177/2050157914565846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rettie, R. (2009). SMS: Exploiting the interactional characteristics of near-synchrony. Information, Communication & Society, 12, 1131–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rime, B. (2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60–85. doi:10.1177/1754073908097189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivière, C. (2005). Mobile camera phones: A new form of “being together” in daily interpersonal communication. In R. Ling& P. Pedersen (Eds.), Mobile communications: Re-negotiation of the social sphere (pp. 167–185). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roesner, F., Gill, B. T., & Kohno, T. (2014). Sex, lies, or kittens? Investigating the use of Snapchat's self-destructing messages. In N. Christin, & S. Reihaneh (Ed.), Financial cryptography and data security (pp. 64–76). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rozzell, B., Piercy, C. W., Carr, C. T., King, S., Lane, B. L., Tornes, M., … Wright, K. B. (2014). Notification pending: Online social support from close and nonclose relational ties via Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 272–280. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstrom, G. M., & Dunn, E. W. (2013). Is Efficiency overrated? Minimal social interactions lead to belonging and positive affect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 437–442. doi:10.1177/1948550613502990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstrom, G. M., & Dunn, E. W. (2014). Social interactions and well-being: The surprising power of weak ties. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(7), 910–922. doi:10.1177/0146167214529799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenebeck, S. Y. (2013, July 8–11). The secret life of online moms: Anonymity and disinhibition on YouBeMom.com. Proceedings of the AAAI International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 2013 (ICWSM '13), Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Schrock, A. R. (2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1229–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editablity, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, 143–189. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2129853
   Google Scholar
• Utz, S., Muscanell, N., & Khalid, C. (2015). Snapchat elicits more jealousy than Facebook: A comparison of Snapchat and Facebook use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(3), 141–146. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van House, N. A. (2009). Collocated photo sharing, story-telling, and the performance of self. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(12), 1073–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieweg, S., Hughes, A. L., Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2010). Microbl ogging during two natural hazards events: What twitter may contribute to situational awareness. Proceedings of CHI, pp. 1079–1088. ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1753486
   Google Scholar
• Vitak, J. (2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 451–470. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.732140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittengl, J. R., & Holt, C. S. (1998). A time-series diary study of mood and social. Motivation and Emotion, 22(3), 255–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Niiya, M., Mark, G., Reich, S., & Warschauer, M. (2015). Coming of age (digitally): An ecological view of social media use among college students. Proceedings of CSCW, pp. 571–582. ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2675271
   Google Scholar
• Wesselmann, E. D., Cardoso, F. D., Slater, S., & Williams, K. D. (2012). To be looked at as though air: Civil attention matters. Psychological Science, 23(2), 166–168. doi:10.1177/0956797611427921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., & Lindley, S. (2014). Curation through use : Understanding the personal value of social media. Proceedings of CHI, pp. 2431–2440. ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2702123.2702221
   Google Scholar