1,631
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Revisiting the concept of ‘sharing’ for digital spaces: an analysis of reader comments to online news

&
Pages 442-460 | Received 30 Nov 2014, Accepted 05 Sep 2015, Published online: 15 Oct 2015

References

  • Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1983). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Irvington (Original work published 1973).
  • Bakardjieva, M., & Gaden, G. (2011). Web 2.0 Technologies of the self. Philosophy & Technology, 25(3), 399–413. doi:10.1007/s13347–011-0032-9
  • Beaujon, A. (2014, 28 Oct). USA Today, WSJ, NYT top U.S. newspapers by circulation [web blog]. Retrieved from http://www.poynter.org/news/mediawire/277337/usa-today-wsj-nyt-top-u-s-newspapers-by-circulation/
  • Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715–734. doi:10.1086/612649
  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. doi: 10.1086/209154
  • boyd, d. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In David Buckingham (Ed.), MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning – Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Brier, A., & Hopp, B. (2011). Computer assisted text analysis in the social sciences. Quality and Quantity, 45, 103–128. doi:10.1007/s11135-010-9350-8
  • Carley, K. M. (1997). Network text analysis: The network position of concepts. In C. W. Roberts (Ed.), Text analysis for the social sciences, (pp. 79–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Carley, K. M., Columbus, D., & Landwehr, P. (2013). AutoMap User's Guide 2013. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research, Technical Report, CMU-ISR-13-105.
  • Conover, P. J., & Searing, D. D. (2005). Studying ‘Everyday Political Talk’ in the Deliberative system. Acta Politica, 40(1), 269–283. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500113
  • Danowski, J. A. (2013). WORDij version 3.0: Semantic network analysis software. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago. Retrieved from http://wordij.net/
  • van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2013a, July 3). 6% of Online Adults are reddit Users. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_reddit_usage_2013.pdf
  • Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2013b, December 30). Social Media Update 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2013/12/PIP_Social-Networking-2013.pdf
  • Ford, S. M. (2011). Reconceptualizing the public/private distinction in the age of information technology. Information, Communication & Society, 14(4), 550–567. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.562220
  • Foucault, M. (1977). The means of correct training. In Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans.) (pp. 170–189). New York, NY: Pantheon.
  • Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Grassmuck, V. (2012). The sharing turn: Why we are generally nice and have a good chance to cooperate our way out of the mess we have gotten ourselves into August 18, 2012. In W. Sützl, F. Stalder, R. Maier & T. Hug (Eds.), Cultures and ethics of sharing / kulturen und ethiken des teilens (pp. 17–34). Lüneburg: Innsbruck University Press. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2295622
  • Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605–622. doi:10.1080/00071310020015280
  • Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of the self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 377–386. doi: 10.1177/0270467610385893
  • Jang, H. Y., & Barnett, G. (1994). Cultural differences in organizational communication: A semantic network analysis. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 44(1), 31–59. doi: 10.1177/075910639404400104
  • Jansson, A. (2012). Perceptions of surveillance: Reflexivity and trust in a mediatized world (the case of Sweden). European Journal of Communication, 27(4), 410–427. doi:10.1177/0267323112463306
  • John, N. A. (2013a). The social logics of sharing. The Communication Review, 16(3), 113–131. doi:10.1080/10714421.2013.807119
  • John, N. A. (2013b). Sharing and web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society, 15(2), 167–182. doi:10.1177/1461444812450684
  • Jurgenson, N., & Rey, P. J. (2012). Comment on Sarah Ford's ‘reconceptualization of privacy and publicity.’ Information, Communication & Society, 15(2), 287–293. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.619552
  • Kelly, M. G. (2013). Foucault, subjectivity, and technologies of the self. In C. Falzon, T. O'Leary & J. Sawicki (Eds.), A companion to foucault (pp. 510–525). West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Laslo, E., Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2011). A growth medium for the message: Online science journalism affordances for exploring public discourse of science and ethics. Journalism, 12(7), 847–870. doi:10.1177/1464884911412709
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Manosevitch, E., & Walker, D. (2009, April 17–18). Reader comments to online opinion journalism: A space of public deliberation. Paper presented to the 10th International Symposium on Online Journalism, Austin, TX.
  • Martin, K. (2015). Understanding privacy online: Development of a social contract approach to privacy. Journal of Business Ethics, (2). doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2565-9
  • Mitchelstein, E. (2011). Catharsis and community: Divergent motivations for audience participation in online newspapers and blogs. International Journal of Communication, 5(11), 2014–2034. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1080/672
  • New York Times. (2013, November 29). Comments and reader reviews. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/content/help/site/usercontent/usercontent.html
  • Newport, F. (12, June 2013). Americans Disapprove of Government Surveillance Programs. Princeton, NJ: Gallup. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/163043/americans-disapprove-government-surveillance-programs.aspx
  • Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy and the integrity of social life. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.
  • Pearson, E. (2009). All the World Wide Web's a stage: The performance of identity in online social networks. First Monday, 14(3). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v14i3.2162 doi: 10.5210/fm.v14i3.2162
  • Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T., & Olmstead, K. (2010). Understanding the participatory news consumer: How internet and cell phone users have turned news into a social experience. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Understanding_the_Participatory_News_Consumer.pdf
  • Reich, Z. (2011). User comments: The transformation of participatory space. In J. B. Singer, A. Hermida, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, S. Paulussen, T. Quandt, Z. Reich, & M. Vujnovic (Eds.), Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers (pp. 96–117). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Ruckenstein, M. (2014). Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies, 4(1), 68–84. doi:10.3390/soc4010068
  • Ruiz, C., Domingo, D., Mico, J. L., Diaz-Noci, J., Meso, K., & Masip, P. (2011). Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 463–487.
  • Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. doi:10.1177/1525822X02239569
  • Simon, A., & Xenos, M. (2000). Media framing and effective public deliberation. Political Communication, 17(4), 363–376. doi:10.1080/10584600050178979
  • Smith, M., Milic-Frayling, N., Shneiderman, B., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Leskovec, J., & Dunne, C. (2010). NodeXL: A free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010. Belmont, CA: Social Media Research Foundation. Retrieved from http://nodexl.codeplex.com/
  • Springer, N., Engelmann, I., & Pfaffinger, C. (2015). User comments: Motives and inhibitors to write and read. Information, Communication & Society. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.997268.
  • Vaz, P., & Bruno, F. (2003). Types of self-surveillance: From abnormality to individuals ‘at risk’. Surveillance & Society, 1(3), 272–291. Retrieved from http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles1(3)/self.pdf
  • Wakita, K., & Tsurumi, T. (2007). Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web – WWW ’07 (p. 1275). New York: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1242572.1242805
  • Walker Rettberg, J. (2014). Seeing ourselves through technology. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137476661
  • Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L. M., & Shulman, H. C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A Test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36(2), 229–253. doi:10.1177/0093650208330251
  • Wittel, A. (2011). Qualities of sharing and their transformations in the digital age. International Review of Information Ethics, 15, 3–8. Retrieved from http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/015/015-Wittel.pdf
  • Zingale, N. C. (2013). The phenomenology of sharing: Social media networking, asserting, and telling. Journal of Public Affairs, 13(3), 288–297. doi: 10.1002/pa.1468

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.