1,758
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Live audience responses to live televised election debates: time series analysis of issue salience and party salience on audience behavior

&
Pages 1390-1410 | Received 20 Nov 2014, Accepted 09 Sep 2015, Published online: 19 Oct 2015

References

  • Anstead, N., & O'Loughlin, B. (2011). The emerging viewertariat and BBC Question Time television debate and real-time commenting online. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 440–462. doi: 10.1177/1940161211415519
  • Asur, S., Huberman, B. A., Szabo, G., & Wang, C. (2011). Trends in Social Media: Persistence and Decay (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1755748). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1755748
  • Boydstun, A. E., Glazier, R. A., Pietryka, M. T., & Resnik, P. (2014). Real-time reactions to a 2012 presidential debate. A method for understanding which messages matter. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(S1), 330–343. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfu007
  • Carmody, T. (2013). Better than Nielsen: Twitter breaks down TV behavior by demographics, device, and genre. Retrieved from http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/10/3861954/twitter-uk-study-real-time-television-ads
  • Ceron, A., Curini, L., & Iacus, S. M. (2015). Using sentiment analysis to monitor electoral campaigns method matters – Evidence from the United States and Italy. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 3–20. doi: 10.1177/0894439314521983
  • Chatfield, C. (2003). The analysis of time series: An introduction (6th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall.
  • D'heer, E., & Verdegem, P. (2015). What social media data mean for audience studies: A multidimensional investigation of Twitter use during a current affairs TV programme. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 221–234. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.952318
  • Diakopoulos, N. A., & Shamma, D. A. (2010). Characterizing debate performance via aggregated Twitter sentiment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1195–1198). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Doughty, M., Rowland, D., & Lawson, S. (2012). Who is on your sofa?: TV audience communities and second screening social networks. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (pp. 79–86). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Elmer, G. (2013). Live research: Twittering an election debate. New Media & Society, 15(1), 18–30. doi: 10.1177/1461444812457328
  • Freelon, D., & Karpf, D. (2015). Of big birds and bayonets: Hybrid Twitter interactivity in the 2012 presidential debates. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 390–406. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.952659
  • Gayo-Avello, D. (2013). A meta-analysis of state-of-the-art electoral prediction from Twitter data. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 649–679. doi: 10.1177/0894439313493979
  • Giglietto, F., & Selva, D. (2014). Second screen and participation: A content analysis on a full season dataset of tweets. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 260–277. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12085
  • Goel, V., & Stelter, B. (2013, October 2). Social networks in a battle for the second screen. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/03/technology/social-networks-in-a-battle-for-the-second-screen.html
  • Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Broersma, M. (2014). New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444814546728
  • Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. doi: 10.1080/19312450709336664
  • Hosch-Dayican, B., Amrit, C., Aarts, K., & Dassen, A. (2014). How do online citizens persuade fellow voters? Using Twitter during the 2012 Dutch parliamentary election campaign. Social Science Computer Review. doi:10.1177/0894439314558200
  • Kalsnes, B., Krumsvik, A. H., & Storsul, T. (2014). Social media as a political backchannel. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3), 313–328. doi: 10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0093
  • Kiousis, S., & McCombs, M. (2004). Agenda-setting effects and attitude strength political figures during the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 31(1), 36–57. doi: 10.1177/0093650203260205
  • Klein, J., Freeman, J., Harding, D., & Teffahi, A. (2014). Assessing the impact of second screen. London: Ofcom. Retrieved from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/technology-research/2014/Second_Screens_Final_report.pdf
  • Lochrie, M., & Coulton, P. (2012). Sharing the viewing experience through second screens. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (pp. 199–202). New York, NY: ACM.
  • McCombs, M. (1977). Agenda setting function of mass media. Public Relations Review, 3(4), 89–95. doi: 10.1016/S0363-8111(77)80008-8
  • McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. doi: 10.1086/267990
  • Murray, J., Goldenberg, S., Agarwal, K., Chakravorty, T., Cutrell, J., Doris-Down, A., & Kothandaraman, H. (2012). Story-map: iPad companion for long form TV narratives. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (pp. 223–226). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Nee, R. C. (2013). Social TV and the 2012 election exploring political outcomes of multiscreen media usages. Electronic News, 7(4), 171–188. doi: 10.1177/1931243113515677
  • Nielsen (2015). New Nielsen Research Shows Social TV is a Bellwether for Audience Engagement. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/press-room/2015/new-nielsen-research-shows-social-tv-is-a-bellwether-for-audience-engagement.html
  • Park, C. S. (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1641–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.044
  • Parmelee, J. H., & Bichard, S. L. (2011). Politics and the Twitter revolution: How Tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
  • Pedersen, S., Baxter, G., Burnett, S., Goker, A., Corney, D., & Martin, C. (2014). Backchannel chat: Peaks and troughs in a Twitter response to three televised debates during the Scottish independence referendum campaign 2014. Robert Gordon University. Retrieved from https://openair.rgu.ac.uk/handle/10059/1086
  • Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850. doi: 10.2307/2111797
  • Roberts, M., Wanta, W., & Dzwo, T.-H. (2002). Agenda setting and issue salience online. Communication Research, 29(4), 452–465. doi: 10.1177/0093650202029004004
  • Sanders, E., & van den Bosch, A. (2013). Relating political party mentions on Twitter with polls and election results. In 9th Belgian-Dutch Information Retrieval Workshop (pp. 87–94). Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-986/paper_9.pdf
  • Takeshita, T. (2006). Current critical problems in agenda-setting research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(3), 275–296. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edh104
  • Trilling, D. (2015). Two different debates? Investigating the relationship between a political debate on TV and simultaneous comments on Twitter. Social Science Computer Review, 33(3), 259–276. doi: 10.1177/0894439314537886
  • Twitter. (2013). Twitter TV Book. Retrieved from http://tweet.twitter.com/TVBook
  • Van Cauwenberge, A., Schaap, G., & van Roy, R. (2014). “TV no longer commands our full attention”: Effects of second-screen viewing and task relevance on cognitive load and learning from news. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 100–109. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.021
  • Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L. (2013). Campaigning on Twitter: Microblogging and online social networking as campaign tools in the 2010 general elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 399–419. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12023
  • Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Cunha, C. (2013). Web campaigning in the 2009 European parliament elections: A cross-national comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 15(1), 128–148. doi: 10.1177/1461444812457337
  • Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2011). Is the voter only a tweet away? Micro blogging during the 2009 European Parliament election campaign in the Netherlands. First Monday, 16(8). Retrieved from http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3540
  • Wakamiya, S., Lee, R., & Sumiya, K. (2011). Crowd-powered TV viewing rates: Measuring relevancy between tweets and TV programs. In J. Xu, G. Yu, S. Zhou, & R. Unland (Eds.), Database systems for advanced applications (pp. 390–401). Berlin: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978–3-642–20244-5_37
  • Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J., & Tresch, A. (2012). The associative dimension of issue ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(4), 771–782. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs023
  • Wanta, W., & Hu, Y.-W. (1994). Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process: An examination of five news media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6(3), 225–240. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/6.3.225
  • Wohn, D. Y., & Na, E.-K. (2011). Tweeting about TV: Sharing television viewing experiences via social media message streams. First Monday, 16(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3368

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.