Understanding the value of networked publics in radio: employing digital methods and social network analysis to understand the Twitter publics of two Italian national radio stations

References

• Anger, I., & Kittl, C. (2011, September 7–9). Measuring influence on Twitter. i–KNOW'11: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on knowledge management and knowledge technologies, Graz, AUT.
   Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arsel, Z., & Bean, J. (2013). Taste regimes and market-mediated practice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 899–917. doi: 10.1086/666595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A. (2013). The potential of productive publics. Ephemera, 13(2), 367–391.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., & Bonini, T. (2015). Valuing audience passions: From smythe to tarde. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(2), 158–173. doi: 10.1177/1367549414563297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., Caliandro, A., Airoldi, M., & Barina, S. (2015). Crowds and value. Italian ‘directioners’ on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society ahead-of-print, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1064462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009, May 17–20). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In the third international ICWSM conference, San Jose, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10, 1000–1008.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1933). Movies and conduct (Vol. 4). New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Boccia Artieri, G. (2012). Stati di Connessione. Milano: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Bonini, T. (2015). The listener as producer: The rise of the networked listener. In T. Bonini & B. Monclùs (Eds.), Radio audiences and participation in the age of network society (pp. 1–35). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingha (Ed.), MacArthur foundation series on digital learning–youth, identity, and digital media volume (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self. Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010, January 6). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. HICSS-43. IEEE: Kauai, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Butsch, R. (2008). The citizen audience. crowds, publics and individuals. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society, the information age: Economy, society and culture, Vol. I. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. (2009). Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies: Communicative capitalism and left politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (1999). Network society: Social aspects of new media. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eurisko. (2015). Radio monitor report. Retrieved June 5, 2015, from http://radiomonitor.it/#
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2010). Labor in informational capitalism and on the Internet. The Information Society, 26(3), 179–196. doi: 10.1080/01972241003712215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini, A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera, 15(1), 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. (1999). Popular culture and high culture: An analysis and evaluation of taste. New York, NY: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA. Retrieved May 4, 2015, from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, B. (2008). Analyzing social networks via the internet. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The sage handbook of online research methods (pp. 141–160). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, D. B. (1995). How consumers consume: A typology of consumption practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1086/209431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M. (2008). Introduction. In K. Varnelis (Ed.), Networked publics (pp. 1–14). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media. Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010, April 26–30). What is twitter: A social network or news media? In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on the World Wide Web, New York, ACM, pp. 591–600.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bon, G. (1895). The crowd. A study of the popular mind. London: Fisher.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. (2007). Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 252–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00395.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N., & Weltevrede, E. (2013). Scraping the social? Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(3), 313–335. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2013.772070
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity and branding in the social media Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, R. (2012). Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9–27. doi: 10.1177/14614440222226244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2012). Without you, I'm nothing: Performances of the self on Twitter. International Journal of Communication, 6, 1989–2006.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on# Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2009). The end of the virtual. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. A. (2013). Mining the social web: Data mining Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, GitHub, and more. Newton, MA: O'Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Schau, H. J., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal Web space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 385–404. doi: 10.1086/378616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smythe, D. W. (1981). On the audience commodity and its work. In D. Smythe (Ed.), Dependency road: Communications, capitalism, consciousness, and Canada (pp. 22–51). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Stage, C. (2013). The online crowd: A contradiction in terms? On the potentials of Gustave Le Bon's crowd psychology in an analysis of affective blogging. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 14(2), 211–226. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2013.773261
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. (1901). L'opinion et la foule. Paris: Alcan.
   Google Scholar
• Varnelis, K. (Ed.). (2008). Networked publics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillien, N., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: Status-specific types of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar