‘We need to get together and make ourselves heard’: everyday online spaces as incubators of political action

References

• Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by “civic engagement”? Journal of Transformative Education, 3, 236–253. doi:10.1177/1541344605276792
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1999). In search of politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1997). The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. (1998). The uncivic culture: Communication, identity and the rise of lifestyle politics. Political Science and Politics, 31, 740–761. doi:10.1017/S1049096500053270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., & Moss, G. (2012). Under construction: The field of online deliberation research. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9, 1–15. doi:10.1080/19331681.2011.635957
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Zúñiga, H. G., Copeland, L., & Bimber, B. (2013). Political consumerism: Civic engagement and the social media connection. New Media and Society, 16, 488–506. doi:10.1177/1461444813487960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, J., & Amna, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22, 283–300. doi:10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K., Margolis, M., Resnick, D., & Ward, S. J. (2003). Election campaigning on the WWW in the USA and UK: A comparative analysis. Party Politics, 9, 47–75. doi:10.1177/135406880391004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zuniga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38, 397–421. doi: 10.1177/0093650210384984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, T. (2010). Talking politics online within spaces of popular culture: The case of the Big Brother forum. Javnost – The Public, 17(4), 25–42. doi:10.1080/13183222.2010.11009039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, T. (2011). What's reality television got to do with it? Talking politics in the net-based public sphere. In K. Brants & K. Voltmer (Eds.), Political communication in postmodern democracy: Challenging the primacy of politics (pp. 248–264). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T. (2012). Beyond ‘political’ communicative spaces: Talking politics on the wife swap discussion forum. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9, 31–45. doi:10.1080/19331681.2012.635961
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., & Harju, A. (2011). Reality TV as a trigger of everyday political talk in the net-based public sphere. European Journal of Communication, 26, 18–32. doi:10.1177/0267323110394858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Wright, S. (in press). From everyday conversation to political action: Talking austerity in online ‘third spaces’. European Journal of Communication. doi:10.1177/0267323115595529
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., & Wright, S. (2014). Discursive equality and everyday talk online: The impact of ‘super-participants’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 625–642. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansard Society. (2012). Audit of political engagement 9 (2012 Report: Part One). Retrieved from the Hansard Society website: http://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/blogs/press_releases/archive/2012/04/25/audit-of-political-engagement-9-part-one.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Wyn, J. (2009). Young people's politics and the micro-territories of the local. Australian Journal of Political Science, 44, 327–344. doi:10.1080/10361140902865308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzidimitriadou, E. (2002). Political ideology, helping mechanisms and empowerment of mental health self help/mutual aid groups. Journal of Community and Applied Psychology, 12, 271–285. doi:10.1002/casp.681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D., Scullion, R., & Molesworth, M. (2013). ‘Ooh, politics. You're brave’. Politics in everyday talk: An analysis of three ‘non-political’ online spaces. In R. Scullion, R. Gerodimos, D. Jackson, & D. G. Lilleker (Eds.), The media, political participation and empowerment (pp. 205–220). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kies, R. (2010). Promises and limits of web-deliberation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, H.-D., & Fuchs, D. (1995). Citizens and the state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2002). Einführung in die qualitative sozialforschung – Eine anleitung zu qualitativem denken (5th ed.). Basel: Beltz Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, N. (2000). Habermas, Kristeva, and citizenship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, A. (1995). Empowerment and the psychiatric consumer/ex-patient movement in the United States: Contradictions, crisis and change. Social Science & Medicine, 40(8), 1053–1071. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00179-W
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netmums. (2014). About us. Retrieved from http://www.netmums.com/home/about-us
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4, 9–27. doi:10.1177/14614440222226244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pols, J. (2006). Washing the citizen: Washing, cleanliness and citizenship in mental health care. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 30, 77–104. doi:10.1007/s11013-006-9009-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, I. (2015). Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 121–138. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.940365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scullion, R., Jackson, D., & Molesworth, M. (2013). Performance, politics and media: How the 2010 British General Election leadership debates generated ‘talk’ amongst the electorate. Journal of Political Marketing, 12, 226–243. doi:10.1080/15377857.2013.781476
   Google Scholar
• Semaan, B. C., Robertson, S. P., Douglas, S., & Maruyama, M. (2014). Social media supporting political deliberation across multiple public spheres: Towards depolarization. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14) (pp. 1409–1421). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531–565. doi:10.1177/0093650205279209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolle, D., & Micheletti, M. (2013). Political consumerism: Global responsibility in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vromen, A., Xenos, M., & Loader, B. D. (2015). Young people, social media and connective action: From organizational maintenance to everyday political talk. Journal of Youth Studies, 18, 80–100. doi:10.1080/13676261.2014.933198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., & Mutz, D. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59, 40–56. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2012). From ‘third place’ to ‘third space’: Everyday political talk in non-political online spaces. Javnost – The Public, 19(3), 5–20. doi:10.1080/13183222.2012.11009088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, R. O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication, 50, 71–92. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02834.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 151–167. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zoonen, L. (2007). Audience reactions to Hollywood politics. Media, Culture & Society, 29, 531–547. doi:10.1177/0163443707076188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar