Mapping the two levels of digital divide: Internet access and social network site adoption among older adults in the USA

References

• Ajrouch, K. J., Blandon, A. Y., & Antonucci, T. C. (2005). Social networks among men and women: The effects of age and socioeconomic status. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(6), S311–S317. doi:10.1093/geronb/60.6.S311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchley, R. C. (1989). A continuity theory of normal aging. The Gerontologist, 29(2), 183–190. doi:10.1093/geront/29.2.183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, C., Fausset, C., Farmer, S., Nguyen, J., Harley, L., & Fain, W. B. (2013, May). Examining social media use among older adults. Paper presented at the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843–857. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, G., & Groselj, D. (2014). Dimensions of Internet use: Amount, variety, and types. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 417–435. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.889189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blieszner, R., & Roberto, K. A. (2004). Friendship across the life span: Reciprocity in individual and relationship development. In F. R. Lang & K. L. Fingerman (Eds.), Growing together: Personal relationships across the life span (pp. 159–182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campos-Castillo, C. (2014). Revisiting the first-level digital divide in the United States: Gender and race/ethnicity patterns, 2007–2012. Social Science Computer Review, 33(4), 423–439. doi:10.1177/0894439314547617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, S. T., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Social and emotional aging. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 383–409. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, N., & Boot, W. R. (2009). Aging and information technology use: Potential and barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 253–258. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01647.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornejo, R., Tentori, M., & Favela, J. (2013). Ambient awareness to strengthen the family social network of older adults. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 22, 309–344. doi:10.1007/s10606-012-9166-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell, B. (2011). Independence through social networks: Bridging potential among older women and men. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66B(6), 782–794. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell, B. (2015). Social disadvantage and network turnover. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(1), 132–142. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbu078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell, B., Laumann, E. O., & Schumm, L. P. (2008). The social connectedness of older adults: A national profile. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 185–203. doi:10.1177/000312240807300201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). A nuanced understanding of Internet use and non-use among the elderly. European Journal of Communication, 30(2), 171–187. doi:10.1177/0267323115578059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355–400). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social media update 2014 [PDF]. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/01/PI_SocialMediaUpdate20144.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., Mooney, C. J., Douthit, K. Z., & Lynch, M. F. (2013). Predictors of older adults’ technology use and its relationship to depressive symptoms and well-being. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(5), 667–677. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbt109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘friends': Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892. doi:10.1177/1461444810385389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eynon, R., & Helsper, E. J. (2011). Adults learning online: Digital choice and/or digital exclusion? New Media & Society, 13(4), 534–551. doi:10.1177/1461444810374789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freese, J., Rivas, S., & Hargittai, E. (2006). Cognitive ability and Internet use among older adults. Poetics, 34(4–5), 236–249. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friemel, T. N. (2014). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/1461444814538648
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7(4). doi:10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00396.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeringa, S., & Connor, J. (1995). Technical description of the Health and Retirement Survey sample design [PDF]. Retrieved from http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/userg/HRSSAMP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ihm, J., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2015). The implications of information and communication technology use for the social well-being of older adults. Information, Communication & Society, 18(10), 1123–1138. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1019912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, L., Ervin, K., Gardner, P., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44(5–6), 363–379. doi:10.1023/A:1010937901821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., Fox, S., Horrigan, J., & Spooner, T. (2000). Who's not online: 57% of those without Internet access say they do not plan to log on [PDF]. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2000/Pew_Those_Not_Online_Report.pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Litwin, H., & Shiovitz-Ezra, S. (2011). Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans. The Gerontologist, 51(3), 379–388. doi:10.1093/geront/gnq094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. doi:10.1177/1461444807080335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüders, M., & Brandtzæg, P. B. (2014). ‘My children tell me it's so simple’: a mixed-methods approach to understand older non-users’ perceptions of social networking sites. New Media & Society. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/1461444814554064
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). The matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesch, G. S. (2012). Minority status and the use of computer-mediated communication: A test of the social diversification hypothesis. Communication Research, 39(3), 317–337. doi:10.1177/0093650211398865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2003). Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 111–121. doi:10.1111/1540-6237.t01-1-8401007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., … Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayago, S., Sloan, D., & Blat, J. (2011). Everyday use of computer-mediated communication tools and its evolution over time: An ethnographical study with older people. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 543–554. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2011.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schradie, J. (2012). The trend of class, race, and ethnicity in social media inequality. Information, Communication & Society, 15(4), 555–571. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.665939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., Furlong, J., & Madden, L. (2003). Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing & Society, 23(5), 561–582. doi:10.1017/S0144686X03001302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settersten, R. A. (2003). Propositions and controversies in life-course scholarship. In R. A. Settersten (Ed.), Invitation to the life course: Toward new understandings of later life (pp. 15–45). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2014). Older adults and technology use [PDF]. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2014/04/PIP_Seniors-and-Tech-Use_040314.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Utz, R. L., Carr, D., Nesse, R., & Wortman, C. B. (2002). The effect of widowhood on older adults’ social participation: An evaluation of activity, disengagement, and continuity theories. The Gerontologist, 42(4), 522–533. doi:10.1093/geront/42.4.522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2010). Computer use by older adults: A multi-disciplinary review. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 870–882. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, I. M., & Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005). Gender and the Internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 252–270. doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00301.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar