7,860
Views
70
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Does Facebook increase political participation? Evidence from a field experiment

&
Pages 1465-1486 | Received 30 Mar 2015, Accepted 09 Nov 2015, Published online: 17 Dec 2015

References

  • Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74, 235–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00655.x
  • Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D., Xenos, M., & Ladwig, P. (2013). The “nasty effect”: Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 373–387. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12009
  • Bachmann, I. & de Zuniga, H. (2013). News platform preference as a predictor of political and civic participation. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies  19(4), 496–512.
  • Bailard, C. S. (2012). A field experiment on the internet's effect in an african election: Savvier citizens, disaffected voters, of both? Journal of Communication, 62(2), 330–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01632.x
  • Bakker, T. P., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Good news for the future? young people, internet use, and political participation. Communication Research, 38(4), 451–470. doi: 10.1177/0093650210381738
  • Barber, B. (1999). Three scenarios for the future of technology and strong democracy. Political Science Quarterly, 113(4), 573–589. doi: 10.2307/2658245
  • Barnes, S., Kaase, M., Allerbeck, K., Heunks, F., Inglehart, R., Jennings, M., … Rosenmayr, L. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  • Baum, M. (2003). Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Baumgartner, J., & Morris, S. (2010). My faceTube politics: Social networking web sites and political engagement of young adults. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 24–44. doi: 10.1177/0894439309334325
  • Bennett, L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39. doi: 10.1177/0002716212451428
  • Bennett, L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Best, S., & Krueger, B. (2005). Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27(2), 183–216. doi: 10.1007/s11109-005-3242-y
  • Bimber, B. (2001). Information and political engagement in america: The search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 53–67. doi: 10.1177/106591290105400103
  • Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15(4), 365–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00340.x
  • Bond, R., Fariss, C., Jones, J., Kramer, A., Marlow, J., & Fowler, J. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489, 295–298. doi: 10.1038/nature11421
  • Boulianne, S. (2009). Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211. doi: 10.1080/10584600902854363
  • Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 524–538. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
  • Cantijoch, M. (2012). Digital media and offline political participation in Spain. In Digital media and political engagement worldwide: A comparative study (pp. 118–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chadwick, A. (2012). Recent shifts in the relationship between the internet and democratic engagement in britain and the United States: Granularity, informational exuberance, and political learning. In E. Anduiza, J. Jensen, & L. Jorba (Eds.), Digital media and political engagement worldwide: A comparative study (pp. 39–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chaffee, E., & Frank, S. (1996). How Americans get political information: Print versus broadcast news. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 48–58. doi: 10.1177/0002716296546001005
  • Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. (2009). The internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dalton, R. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x
  • Dalton, R., Van Sickle, A., & Weldon, S. (2009). The individual–institutional nexus of protest behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 51–73. doi: 10.1017/S000712340999038X
  • Dalton, R., & Wattenberg, M. (2000). Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Delli Carpini, M., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and Why It matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Delli Carpini, M., & Keeter, S. (1997). What Americans know about politics and Why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Stromback, J., & Nord, L. W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41(1), 95–118. doi: 10.1177/0093650211426004
  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
  • Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet Age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Ekstrom, M., & Östman, J. (2013). Information, interaction, and creative production: The effects of three forms of internet Use on youth democratic engagement. Communication Research42(6), 796–818. doi: 10.1177/0093650213476295
  • Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ Use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
  • Enjolras, B., Steen-Johnsen, K., & Wollebaek, D. (2013). Social media and mobilization to offline demonstrations: Transcending participatory divides? New Media & Society, 15(6), 890–908. doi: 10.1177/1461444812462844
  • Etzioni, A. (1993). The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities, and the communitarian agenda. New York: Crown.
  • Gibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. (2013). Conceptualizing and measuring participation in the age of the internet: Is online political engagement really different to offline? The Journal of Politics, 75(3), 701–716. doi: 10.1017/S0022381613000431
  • Gil de Zuniga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2010). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38(3), 397–421. doi: 10.1177/0093650210384984
  • Gladwell, M. (2010). Why the Revolution Will not be Tweeted. The New Yorker.
  • Henley, J. (2012). Greece on the breadline: Pooling resources to provide an education.
  • Hirzalla, F., & Van Zoonen, L. (2010). Beyond the online/offline divide: How youth's online and offline civic activities converge. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 481–498. doi: 10.1177/0894439310385538
  • Holt, K., Shehata, A., Stromback, J., & Ljungberg, E. (2013). Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveller? European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 19–34. doi: 10.1177/0267323112465369
  • Honaker, J., King, G., & Blackwell, M. (2011). Amelia II: A program for missing data. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(7), 1–47. doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i07
  • Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy's fourth wave? digital media and the arab spring. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hwang, H. Borah, P. Namkoong, K., & Veenstra, A. (2008). Does Civility Matter in the Blogosphere? Examining the Interaction Effects of Incivility and Disagreement on citizen Attitudes. Paper presented at the 58th annual conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal.
  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Jung, N., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 407–430. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.496135
  • Kahne, J., Lee, N. J., & Freezel, J. (2013). The civic and political significance of online participatory cultures among youth transitioning to adulthood. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2012.701109
  • Kathimerini. (2011). ‘Indignant’ Greeks to return for second day of protest.
  • Kathimerini. (2015). «Εμφύλιος” στα μέσα κοινωνικής δικτύωσης” [“Civil war” in social networking sites”]. Kathimerini, June 6, Retrieved from http://www.kathimerini.gr/821393/article/epikairothta/politikh/emfylios-sta-mesa-koinwnikhs-diktywshs
  • Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. New York: Free Press.
  • Kern, H., & Haimueller, J. (2009). Opium for the masses: How foreign media can stabilize authoritarian regimes. Political Analysis, 17(4), 377–399. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpp017
  • Kittilson, M., & Dalton, R. (2011). Virtual civil society: The new frontier of social capital? Political Behavior, 33, 625–644. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9143-8
  • Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–31. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
  • Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Duel, Sloan & Pearce.
  • Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. (1948). Mass communication, popular taste, and organized social action. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas, (pp. 95–118). New York: Harper.
  • Little, R., & Rubin, D. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. London: Wiley.
  • Lynch, M. (2011). After Egypt: The limits and promise of online challenges to the authoritarian arab state. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 301–310. doi: 10.1017/S1537592711000910
  • Morozov, E. (2009). Foreign Policy: The brave new world of slacktivism. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104302141
  • Morris, S., & Morris, S. (2013). Digital inequality and participation in the political process: Real or imagined? Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 589–600. doi: 10.1177/0894439313489259
  • Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: The internet, society and participation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Nie, N., & Erbring, A. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report. Stanford: Technical report, Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society.
  • Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information proverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Norris, P., & Jones, D. (1998). Virtual democracy. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 3(1), 1–4.
  • Oser, J., Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). Is online participation distinct from offline participation? A latent class analysis of participation types and their stratification. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 91–101. doi: 10.1177/1065912912436695
  • Pasek, J., More, E., & Romer, D. (2009). Realizing the social internet? online social networking meets offline civic engagement. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3), 197–215. doi: 10.1080/19331680902996403
  • Pharr, S., & Putnam, R. (2000). Disaffected democracies: What's troubling the trilateral countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the Age of show business. New York, NY: Penguin.
  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Quintelier, E., & Vissers, S. (2008). The effect of internet use on political participation: An analysis of survey results for 16-year-olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review, 26(4), 411–427. doi: 10.1177/0894439307312631
  • Rojas, H., & Puig-I-Abril, E. (2009). Mobilizers mobilized: Information, expression, mobilization and participation in the digital Age. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 902–927. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01475.x
  • Scheufele, D. A. (2002). Examining differential gains from mass media and their implications for participatory behavior. Communication Research, 29(1), 46–65. doi: 10.1177/009365020202900103
  • Schlozman, K., Verba, S., & Brady, H. (2012). The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Sekhon, J. (2011). Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(7), 1–52. doi: 10.18637/jss.v042.i07
  • Shah, D., Cho, J., Eveland, W., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital Age: Modeling internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531–565. doi: 10.1177/0093650205279209
  • Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: How change happens when people come together. London: Penguin.
  • Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media. Foreign affairs, 90(1), 28–41.
  • Smith, A. (2013). Civic engagement in the digital age. Technical report, Pew Research Center.
  • Tang, G., & Lee, F. (2013). Facebook Use and political participation The impact of exposure to shared political information, connections With public political actors, and network structural heterogeneity. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 763–773. doi: 10.1177/0894439313490625
  • Tewksbury, D., Weaver, A., & Maddex, B. (2001). Accidentally informed: Incidental news exposure on the world wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 533–544. doi: 10.1177/107769900107800309
  • Theocharis, Y. (2015). The conceptualization of digitally networked participation. Social Media & Society, 1(2), 1–14. Advance online publication, doi:10.1177/2056305115610140
  • Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., van Deth, J. W., & García-Albacete (2015). Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: Online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 202–220. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.948035
  • Theocharis, Y., & Quintelier, E. (2014) Stimulating citizenship or expanding entertainment: The effect of facebook on adolescent participation. New Media & Society, Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1461444814549006
  • Towner, T. (2013). All political participation is socially networked? New media and the 2012 election. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 527–541. doi: 10.1177/0894439313489656
  • Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from tahrir square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
  • Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 920–942. doi: 10.1177/0002764213479375
  • Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x
  • Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1146–1171. doi: 10.1080/13691181003628307
  • Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Vissers, S., Hooghe, M., Stolle, D., & Maheo, V.-A. (2011). The impact of mobilization media on Off-line and online participation: Are mobilization effects medium-specific? Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 152–169. doi: 10.1177/0894439310396485
  • Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital?: Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436–455. doi: 10.1177/00027640121957286
  • Xenos, M., & Moy, P. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 704–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00364.x
  • Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. (2014). The great equalizer? patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151–167. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
  • Zhang, T., Johnson, T., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. L. (2009). The revolution will be networked: The influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 75–92. doi: 10.1177/0894439309335162
  • Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Delli Carpini, M. (2006). A New engagement? political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.