2,970
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Contextual social capital: linking the contexts of social media use to its outcomes

Pages 582-600 | Received 09 Oct 2015, Accepted 04 Jan 2016, Published online: 07 Feb 2016

References

  • Appel, L., Dadlani, P., Dwyer, M., Hampton, K., Kitzie, V., Matni, Z. A., … Teodoro, R. (2014). Testing the validity of social capital measures in the study of information and communication technologies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 398–416. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.884612
  • Barker, V. (2012). A generational comparison of social networking site use: The influence of age and social identity. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 74(2), 163–187. doi:10.2190/AG.74.2.d
  • Beaudoin, C. E., & Thorson, E. (2004). Social capital in rural and urban communities: Testing differences in media effects and models. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 378–399.
  • Bohn, A., Buchta, C., Hornik, K., & Mair, P. (2014). Making friends and communicating on Facebook: Implications for the access to social capital. Social Networks, 37(1), 29–41. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.11.003
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Eds.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Oxford: Greenwood Press.
  • boyd, d., & Hargittai, E. (2010). Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? First Monday, 15(8), 1–17. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3086
  • Brandtzæg, P. B. (2012). Social networking sites: Their users and social implications. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 467–488. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01580.x
  • Bumgarner, B. A. (2007). You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults. First Monday, 12(11). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2026
  • Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of CHI'11, May 7–12, 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada (pp. 571–580). New York, NY: ACM Press.
  • Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of CHI'10 (pp. 1909–1912). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Canary, D. J., Stafford, L., Hause, K. S., & Wallace, L. A. (1993). An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies. Communication Research Reports, 10(1), 3–14. doi:10.1080/08824099309359913
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), S95–S120. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/pss/2780243
  • Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.
  • Dattalo, P. (2013). Analysis of multiple dependent variables. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Donath, J. S. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 231–251. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00394.x
  • Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2014). Social media update 2014. Washington, DC: Pew Research Centers. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/01/PI_SocialMediaUpdate20144.pdf
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367
  • Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855–870. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12078
  • Engström, K., Mattsson, F., Järleborg, A., & Hallqvist, J. (2008). Contextual social capital as a risk factor for poor self-rated health. Social Science and Medicine, 66, 2268–2280. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.019
  • Fleming, K., Thorson, E., & Peng, Z. (2005). Associational membership as a source of social capital. Mass Communication & Society, 8(3), 219–240. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0803_3
  • Garson, G. D. (2015). GLM multivariate, MANOVA, & canonical correlation. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates.
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
  • Hampton, K. N., Lee, C.-J., & Her, E. J. (2011). How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings. New Media & Society, 13(7), 1031–1049. doi:10.1177/1461444810390342
  • Hargittai, E. (2008). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276–297. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00396.x
  • Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “Net Generation.” Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
  • Hays, R. B. (1984). The development and maintenance of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1(1), 75–98. doi:10.1177/0265407584011005
  • Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125–147. doi:10.1080/13691180500146185
  • Human, R., & Lane, D. (2008, November 21–24). Virtually friends in cyberspace. Paper presented at National Communication Association Annual Meeting. San Diego, CA.
  • Johnston, K., Tanner, M., Lalla, N., & Kawalski, D. (2011). Social capital: The benefit of Facebook “friends.” Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(1), 1–13. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2010.550063
  • Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? In Proceedings of CHI ’08 (pp. 1027–1036). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357213
  • Katz, E. (1959). Mass communications research and the study of popular culture. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1–6. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/165
  • Krämer, N., Rösner, L., Eimler, S., Winter, S., & Neubaum, G. (2014). Let the weakest link go! Empirical explorations on the relative importance of weak and strong ties on social networking sites. Societies, 4(4), 785–809. doi:10.3390/soc4040785
  • Kraut, R. E., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49–74. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00248
  • Kwon, S., & Adler, P. S. (2014). Social capital: Maturation of a field. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 412–422. doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0210
  • Kwon, M.-W., D'Angelo, J., & McLeod, D. M. (2013). Facebook use and social capital: To bond, to bridge, or to escape. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 33(1–2), 35–43. doi:10.1177/0270467613496767
  • Lampe, C., Ellison, N. B., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A Face(book) in the crowd. In Proceedings of CSCW'06 (p. 167). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Lampe, C., Wash, R., Velasquez, A., & Ozkaya, E. (2010).Motivations to participate in online communities. In Proceedings of CHI'10 (p. 1927). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Ledesma, RD, & Valero-Mora, P. (2007). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(2). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=2
  • Lee, E., Kim, Y. J., & Ahn, J. (2014). How do people use Facebook features to manage social capital? Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 440–445. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.007
  • Lee, J.-H., Garrett, T. C., Self, D. R., & Findley Musgrove, C. S. (2012). Expressive versus instrumental functions on technology attractiveness in the UK and Korea. Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1600–1605. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.045
  • Leung, L. (2013). Generational differences in content generation in social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 997–1006. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.028
  • Levin, D. Z., Walter, J., & Murnighan, J. K. (2010). Dormant ties: The value of reconnecting. Organization Science, 22(4), 923–939. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0576
  • Lin, C. A. (1996). Looking back: The contribution of Blumler and Katz's uses of mass communication to communication research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(4), 574–581. doi:10.1080/08838159609364379
  • Lin, N. (2001). Building a network theory of social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 3–29). New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
  • Lin, N., & Erickson, B. (2008). Theory, measurement, and the research enterprise on social capital. In N. Lin, & B. Erickson (Eds.), Social capital: An international research program (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Liu, H. (2007). Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 252–275. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00395.x
  • Mo, R., & Leung, L. (2015). Exploring the roles of narcissism, uses of, and gratifications from microblogs on affinity-seeking and social capital. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 152–162. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12087
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2009a). The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. New Media & Society, 11(1–2), 199–220. doi:10.1177/1461444808099577
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2009b). Uses and gratifications. In D. W. Stacks, & M. B. Salwen (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (2 ed., pp. 137–152). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Papacharissi, Z., & Mendelson, A. (2011). Toward a new(er) sociability: Uses, gratifications, and social capital on Facebook. In S. Papathanassopoulos (Ed.), Media perspectives for the 21st century (pp. 212–230). New York: Routledge.
  • Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175–196. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2
  • Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729–33. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0003
  • Pearson, E. (2009). All the World Wide Web's a stage: The performance of identity in online social networks. First Monday, 14(3). doi:10.5210/fm.v14i3.2162
  • Poortinga, W. (2006). Social relations or social capital? Individual and community health effects of bonding social capital. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 255–270. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.039
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  • Quan-Haase, A., & Wellman, B. (2004). How does the Internet affect social capital? In M. Huysman, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Social capital and information technology (pp. 113–131). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361. doi:10.1177/027046761038000
  • Rubin, AM. (2009). Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effects. In J. Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 3ed (pp. 165–184). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3–37. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
  • Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 259–288. doi:10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02524.x
  • Shah, D. V. (1998). Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use. Political Psychology, 19, 469–496.
  • Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., & Holbert, R. L. (2001). “Connecting” and “disconnecting” with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18(2), 141–162. doi:10.1080/105846001750322952
  • Shin, D. H., & Shin, Y. J. (2011). Why do people play social network games? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 852–861. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.010
  • Shklovski, I., Kraut, R., & Cummings, J. (2008). Keeping in touch by technology: Maintaining friendships after a residential move. In Proceedings of CHI'08 (p. 807). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Sledgianowski, D., & Kulviwat, S. (2009). Using social network sites: The effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(4), 74–83.
  • Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322–2329. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011
  • Spiliotopoulos, T., & Oakley, I. (2013).Understanding motivations for Facebook use. In Proceedings of CHI'13 (p. 3287). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434–445. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002
  • Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Vitak, J. (2012). Online social network sites and the concept of social capital. In F. L. Lee, L. Leung, J. S. Qiu, & D. Chu (Eds.), Frontiers in new media research (pp. 115–131). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. In C. T. Salmon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 36 (pp. 143–189). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Utz, S., & Muscanell, N. (2015). Social media and social capital: Introduction to the Special Issue. Societies, 5(2), 420–424. doi:10.3390/soc5020420
  • Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x
  • Vitak, J. (2014). Variations across relational and communicative properties. Societies, 4(4), 561–586. doi:10.3390/soc4040561
  • Wang, Z., Tchernev, J. M., & Solloway, T. (2012). A dynamic longitudinal examination of social media use, needs, and gratifications among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1829–1839. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.001
  • Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. N. (2001). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436–455. doi:10.1177/00027640121957286
  • Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research, 16, 362–369. doi:10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041
  • Williams, D. (2006). On and off the ’net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 593–628. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029.x
  • Wohn, D., Lee, Y., & Sung, J. (2010). Building common ground and reciprocity through social network games. In Proceedings of CHI'10 (pp. 4423–4428).
  • Xie, W. (2014). Social network site use, mobile personal talk and social capital among teenagers. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 228–235. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.042

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.