Social networking sites and low-income teenagers: between opportunity and inequality

References

• Ahn, J. (2011). Digital divides and social network sites: Which students participate in social media? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(2), 147–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berriman, L., & Thomson, R. (2015). Spectacles of intimacy? Mapping the moral landscape of teenage social media. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(5), 583–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, G. (2013). Who creates content? Stratification and content creation on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 590–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication, 17(1), 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1965). Un Art moyen. Essais sur les usages sociaux de la photoraphie. Paris: Les Editions De Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In R. Brown (Eds.), Knowledge, education and cultural change (pp. 71–112). London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction. Paris: Les Editions De Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2010). Friendship. In M. Ito, S. Baumer, M. Bittani, d. boyd, R. Cody, B. Herr-Stephenson, … L. Tripp (Eds.), Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out kids living and learning with new media (pp. 79–115). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2012). White flight in networked publics? How race and class shaped American teen engagement with MySpace and Facebook. In L. Nakamura & P. A. Chow-White (Eds.), Race After the Internet (pp. 203–222). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social-network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. S. (2009). Digital media and the generation gap. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 388–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, T. (2010). The participation divide among “online experts”: Experience, skills and psychological factors as predictors of college students’ web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 71–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, T. (2015). Digital skills and social media use: How Internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among “digital natives”. Information, Communication & Society, 1–13. Published online: 14 Sep 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2013). Social media update 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J. (2015). CITASA: Intellectual past and future. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 478–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobo, G. (2001). Descrivere il mondo. Teoria e pratica del metodo etnografico. Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Gui, M., & Argentin, G. (2011). Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13(6), 963–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haight, M., Quan-Haase, A., & Corbett, B. (2014). Revisiting the digital divide in Canada: The impact of demographic factors on access to the Internet, level of online activity, and social-networking site usage. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 503–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2008). Troubles with triangulation. In M. M. Bergman (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research (pp. 22–36). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7(4).
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose Space? Differences among users and non-users of social-network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276–297. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00396.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the ‘net generation’. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society, 11(2), 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, E., & Rose, D. (2006). The European Socio-economic Classification (ESeC) user guide. Colchester: Institute for social and economic research, University of Essex.
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (1995). The active interview. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, S., Clark, L. S., & Alters, D. (2004). Media, home and family. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittani, M., boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., … Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, A. (2015). Intimacy and social capital on Facebook: Beyond the psychological perspective. New Media & Society, 1–17. Published online: June 1, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Litt, E. (2013). Understanding social network site users’ privacy tool use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1649–1656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascheroni, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2014). Net children go mobile: Risks and opportunities (2nd ed.). Milano: Educatt.
   Google Scholar
• Micheli, M. (2015). What is new in the digital divide? Understanding internet use by teenagers from different social backgrounds. In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale, & A. Williams (Eds.), Communication and information technologies annual. Digital distinctions and inequalities (pp. 55–87). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, K. E., & Rice, R. E. (2013). Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and personal computer internet users. Journal of Communication, 63, 721–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2006). Adolescents’ internet use: Testing the ‘disappearing digital divide’ versus the ‘emerging digital differentiation’ approach. Poetics, 34(4–5), 293–305. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, L. (2009). A taste for the necessary: A Bourdieuian approach to digital inequality. Information, Communication & Society, 12(4), 488–507. doi:10.1080/13691180902857678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., … Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society. Published online: March 16, 2015, 1–14. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., … Miles, A. (2013). A new model of social class? Findings from the BBC's great British class survey experiment. Sociology, 47(2), 219–250. doi:10.1177/0038038513481128
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362. doi:10.1177/1461444804042519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2000). Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sims, C. (2013). From differentiated use to differentiating practices: Negotiating legitimate participation and the production of privileged identities. Information, Communication & Society, 17(6), 670–682. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.808363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide. Inequality in the information society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. J. D. (1997). Three pernicious premises in the study of the American Ghetto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 21(2), 341–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, J. C., & Mannon, S. E. (2010). The internet and social inequalities. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Leung, L. (2015). A review of social networking service (SNS) research in communication journals from 2006 to 2011. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1007–1024. doi:10.1177/1461444813520477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillien, N., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: Status-specific types of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274–291. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar